Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Genitourinary Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1662567

This article is part of the Research TopicNext-Generation Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Precision, Personalization, and Technological AdvancesView all 5 articles

Definitive Radiotherapy for Local and Metastatic Lesions in Prostate Cancer Patients with Oligometastases

Provisionally accepted
Bichun  XuBichun Xu1,2Xianzhi  ZhaoXianzhi Zhao1,3Yiyin  LiangYiyin Liang1Weiwei  ZhangWeiwei Zhang1Liang  ChenLiang Chen1Yusheng  YeYusheng Ye1Jie  HeJie He1Jiaojiao  TongJiaojiao Tong1Yangyang  GongYangyang Gong1Judong  LuoJudong Luo2*Huojun  ZhangHuojun Zhang1*
  • 1Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
  • 2Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China
  • 3Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Few studies explore the role of definitive radiotherapy for prostate and all metastases in the treatment of low-burden oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPCa). This study aimed to investigate the potential survival benefit of this approach. Moreover, it is the first study to report the outcomes of definitive radiotherapy for local and distant metastatic lesions in patients with omPCa from China. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with omPCa who received definitive radiotherapy for the primary site and metastatic lesions between July 2012 and June 2022. The inclusion criteria mandated fewer than 5 oligometastases, excluding regional lymph nodes by imaging examinations with no prior radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy for omPCa. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, and biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) were the secondary endpoint. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: A total of 33 patients, including 31 de novo oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (omHSPC) patients and 2 oligometastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (omCRPC) patients, were enrolled in the study. The median follow-up was 38.8 months (range: 4.2–70.6 months). The OS rates of 2-, 3-, and 5-year after treatment were 100.0%, 95.7%,and 81.2%, respectively. Factors correlating with poorer survival were pre-radiotherapy CRPC status, symptomatic lesions, and prior transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Multivariate analysis revealed potential associations: concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or chemotherapy, non-CRPC status pre-radiotherapy. Lymph node and bone metastases together increased the risk of biochemical recurrence. Acute adverse reactions of Grade 3+ were absent; chronic Grade 3 reactions were 3.0%. Conclusion: Definitive radiotherapy for local/metastatic lesions demonstrates promising survival with manageable toxicity in omPCa.

Keywords: Radiotherapy, prostate cancer, Oligometastases, definitive, overall survival

Received: 09 Jul 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Xu, Zhao, Liang, Zhang, Chen, Ye, He, Tong, Gong, Luo and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Judong Luo, judongluo@tongji.edu.cn
Huojun Zhang, huojunzh@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.