Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Breast Cancer

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1663293

Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer

Provisionally accepted
Xuejuan  DuanXuejuan Duan1Yadong  LiuYadong Liu2Yuguang  ShangYuguang Shang1Xiaomeng  LuXiaomeng Lu1Yanhong  ZhouYanhong Zhou1Liguo  LiuLiguo Liu3Zhikun  LiuZhikun Liu1*
  • 1The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
  • 2Department of Oncology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
  • 3China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background and Purpose: Radiation dermatitis (RD), a common adverse reaction in breast cancer radiotherapy, impairs quality of life and increases healthcare burdens. Developing an effective risk prediction model is crucial for early high-risk patient identification and preventive interventions. Materials and Methods: This study enrolled 691 breast cancer patients undergoing postoperative radiotherapy at our center from February 1 to December 19, 2024. RD severity and correlates were monitored during and 2 weeks after radiotherapy. The dataset was divided into training (n=552) and test (n=139) cohorts. Fourteen machine learning algorithms were evaluated via 10-fold cross-validation, with model selection based on Area Under the Curve (AUC) and other metrics. Model reliability was verified using an internal hold-out test set, and SHAP analysis ensured interpretability. Results: Among 691 patients,52.68% (n=364) developed grade ≥2 acute RD. The random forest model performed best, achieving an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.807–0.873) in training and 0.748 (0.665–0.831) in testing, with training/testing sensitivity/specificity of 0.811/0.747 and 0.877/0.576, respectively. Calibration curves confirmed prediction-observation consistency. Decision curve analysis indicated 0.2–0.4 higher net benefits than "treat-all" or "treat-none" strategies at 25%–75% treatment thresholds. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified Clinical Target Volume-Supraclavicular (CTVsc), Clinical Target Volume-Internal Mammary (CTVim), TNM stage II, and diabetic status as key predictors. Conclusion: This explainable machine learning model demonstrates robust discriminative power and clinical utility. Interpretability analysis revealed feature nonlinearities, providing a theoretical basis for personalized radiotherapy planning to reduce severe RD risk.

Keywords: Radiation dermatitis, predictive model, breast cancer, Shap, Radiotherapy

Received: 10 Jul 2025; Accepted: 07 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Duan, Liu, Shang, Lu, Zhou, Liu and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Zhikun Liu, victory.liu@aliyun.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.