ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Hematologic Malignancies
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1663814
This article is part of the Research TopicChimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapies and Bispecific Antibodies in Hematologic MalignanciesView all 3 articles
Post-Progression Outcomes Following BCMA-Directed CAR T-Cell Therapy in Myeloma: Impact of Extramedullary and Paramedullary Disease
Provisionally accepted- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapies have improved outcomes in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM); however, the majority of patients relapse within 1 to 3 years following treatment. Managing disease progression after CAR T-cell therapy remains a major challenge, particularly in aggressive subtypes including extramedullary disease (EMD) and paramedullary disease (PMD). Real-world data on progression patterns post-CAR T cell therapy and the impact of EMD or PMD on outcomes of patients who relapsed post-CAR T-cell therapy remain scarce. In this single-center, retrospective study, we evaluated progression patterns and survival outcomes in 106 MM patients who progressed after commercial CAR T-cell therapy (ide-cel or cilta-cel) between May 2021 and December 2023. Overall survival (OS) was defined from the time of post-CAR T-cell therapy progression to death or last follow-up, and progression-free survival (PFS) from post-CAR T-cell therapy progression to progression on the next line of therapy. Biochemical relapse occurred in 82% of patients, with EMD or PMD present in 51% at progression. Baseline EMD at the time of CAR T-cell infusion was detected in 33% of patients and was associated with significantly inferior PFS (3.6 vs. 7.0 months, p=0.0076) and OS (4.8 vs. 21.0 months, p=0.00086) compared to those without EMD. Similarly, the presence of EMD at progression was associated with shorter PFS (4.7 vs. 8.5 months, p=0.022) and OS (7.4 vs. 21.1 months, p=0.035). Patients who were EMD positive at both baseline and progression had the poorest outcomes. PMD at baseline or progression was not significantly associated with worse survival. Our findings highlight that post-CAR T-cell progression in MM is heterogeneous and that EMD confers an adverse prognosis, emphasizing the critical need for imaging surveillance. Strategies such as bridging therapies aimed at reducing tumor burden prior to CAR T-cell infusion or maintenance therapies post-CAR T-cell therapy warrant further investigation to optimize responses and improve long-term survival in this high-risk population.
Keywords: Multiple Myeloma, CAR T-cell therapy, progression, Extramedullary disease, Survival outcomes
Received: 11 Jul 2025; Accepted: 08 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Abuhelwa, Amisha, Fan, De Avila, Hansen, Grajales-Cruz, Blue, Castaneda, Liu, Freeman, Nishihori, Locke, Shain, Baz and Alsina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Melissa Alsina, melissa.alsina@moffitt.org
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.