Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Surgical Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1664914

Case Report: Treatment and Literature Review of Gallbladder Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma in the Context of Multiple Myeloma

Provisionally accepted
Yuhan  YinYuhan Yin1,2*Xinjie  DaiXinjie Dai2Dan  LiDan Li2Xinyu  YangXinyu Yang2Nan  MingNan Ming2Kang  XiangKang Xiang2Dengding  WuDengding Wu2Kong  AiKong Ai2Jun  ZhengJun Zheng1*Jun  HuJun Hu2,3*
  • 1Yichang Central people‘s Hospital, Yichang, China
  • 2China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China
  • 3Yichang Second People's Hospital, Yichang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Gallbladder Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (GB-LCNEC), an extremely rare pathological subtype of gallbladder malignancies, is characterized by high aggressiveness and insidious onset, often leading to poor prognosis and presenting significant clinical management challenges. This report presents the complete treatment course of a patient diagnosed with GB-LCNEC complicated by active Multiple Myeloma (MM), accompanied by a systematic review of relevant literature published over the past decade. Preoperative imaging revealed a gallbladder mass, which was pathologically confirmed postoperatively as GB-LCNEC through histological and immunohistochemical analysis. The tumor demonstrated large cell morphology, high mitotic activity (Ki-67 index of 50%), and strong expression of neuroendocrine markers, including Insulinoma-Associated Protein 1 (INSM1). Despite the concurrent diagnosis of active MM, a Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) successfully performed radical resection for gallbladder carcinoma, which included cholecystectomy, wedge resection of adjacent hepatic tissue, and regional lymphadenectomy at the hepatic hilum. An R0 resection was achieved, laying a solid foundation for postoperative management. Given the patient's limited tolerance to the standard Etoposide–Cisplatin (EP) chemotherapy regimen, a milder, individualized approach using the Capecitabine–Temozolomide (CAPTEM) regimen was selected. Simultaneously, the patient's MM was treated with the Daratumumab–Lenalidomide–Dexamethasone (DRD) regimen. At six-month follow-up, there was no evidence of recurrence or metastasis, and the patient maintained a favorable general condition. This case underscores that in highly aggressive malignancies such as GB-LCNEC, surgical resection remains a cornerstone of effective disease control and survival extension, even in the presence of severe comorbidities. MDT-based decision-making and personalized treatment strategies are essential for optimizing therapeutic outcomes and minimizing treatment-related risks. Future research should prioritize the development of multicenter clinical registries and large-scale molecular profiling, while also evaluating emerging modalities such as targeted therapies and immunotherapy to ultimately improve the prognosis of this rare tumor entity.

Keywords: Gallbladder Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma, Multiple Myeloma, GB-LCNEC, Multiple myeloma (MM), neuroendocrine tumors (NENs), well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (NET), poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine tumors (MiNEN)

Received: 13 Jul 2025; Accepted: 30 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yin, Dai, Li, Yang, Ming, Xiang, Wu, Ai, Zheng and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yuhan Yin, 421602896@qq.com
Jun Zheng, 12599309@qq.com
Jun Hu, hujun@ctgu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.