Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Thoracic Oncology

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing Diagnostic Excellence in Early Lung Cancer DetectionView all 11 articles

Clinical application of confocal laser endomicroscopy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

Provisionally accepted
Shenglan  YeShenglan Ye1Mingli  YuanMingli Yuan2Haoliang  WUHaoliang WU1Zhen  YangZhen Yang1Yi  HuYi Hu1*jixiang  Nijixiang Ni1*
  • 1The central hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, China
  • 2The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is an innovative in vivo microscopic imaging technique that enables real-time visualization of tissue cytology during endoscopic examinations. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of pCLE in diagnosing MPE. Methods: A total of 41 patients with pleural effusion (PE) who underwent pCLE examination were enrolled in this prospective study. The diagnostic performance of pCLE was assessed by calculating sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy (ACC), using histopathological results as the reference standard. Additionally, the safety profile of the pCLE procedure was evaluated. Results: Among the 41 patients, histopathological analysis confirmed MPE in 31 patients and benign pleural effusion (BPE)in 10 patients. Of the 31 MPE cases, 26 were lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), 2 were lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), 1 was large cell lung cancer (LCLC, a subtype of non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC]), 1 was pleural malignant mesothelioma (PMM), and 1 was pleural metastasis from other tumors. Compared with histopathology, pCLE demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.77%, specificity of 2 80%, accuracy of 92.68%, PPV of 93.75%, and NPV of 88.89%. There was substantial agreement between pCLE and histopathological findings (kappa = 0.79, p < 0.001). Furthermore, compared to conventional thoracoscopy, pCLE facilitated targeted biopsy sampling and improved detection of malignant lesions. No adverse events related to pCLE were observed, indicating its favorable safety profile. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that pCLE is a valuable tool for enhancing the diagnosis of MPE, with high concordance with histopathological findings (kappa = 0.79, p < 0.001) and significant guidance for thoracoscopic pleural biopsies. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of pCLE were 96.77%, 80%, 92.68%, 93.75%, and 88.89%, respectively, when compared with histopathology. These results indicate that pCLE can effectively differentiate between benign and malignant pleural effusion in patients with undetermined etiology and serves as a robust complementary method to existing diagnostic approaches. However, the small sample size of this study limits the generalizability of the findings, and further large-scale, multicenter clinical trials are needed to validate these results.

Keywords: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE), medical thoracoscopy(MT), Malignant pleural effusion (MPE), diagnostic value, Pleural Effusion

Received: 15 Jul 2025; Accepted: 28 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ye, Yuan, WU, Yang, Hu and Ni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yi Hu
jixiang Ni

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.