Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Radiation Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1666489

This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Approaches in Precision Radiation OncologyView all 18 articles

Anesthesia is a Potent Determinant of Ultra-High Dose Rate Sparing in the Murine Total Abdominal Irradiation Model

Provisionally accepted
Armin  TavakkoliArmin Tavakkoli1,2*William  W DaleyWilliam W Daley2David  I HunterDavid I Hunter2Beverly  A AllenBeverly A Allen2Gretchen  C CarpenterGretchen C Carpenter2David  J GladstoneDavid J Gladstone2Brian  William PogueBrian William Pogue2P. Jack  HoopesP. Jack Hoopes1,2
  • 1Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, United States
  • 2Dartmouth College Thayer School of Engineering, Hanover, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Radiation therapy is a mainstay of treatment for numerous gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, where our ability to deliver dose to tumors is limited by acute GI toxicity. Ultra-high dose-rate (UHDR) 'FLASH' irradiation can spare normal tissue, yet its dependence on physiological variables remains incompletely defined. We compared FLASH and conventional dose-rate (CDR) 9 MeV electron total abdominal irradiation (TAI) in C57BL/6 mice anesthetized with either intraperitoneal ketamine/xylazine or inhaled isoflurane in room air, deliberately omitting supplemental oxygen. Single doses of 14 or 16 Gy were delivered, and normal-tissue injury was quantified by time-to-25% body-weight loss.At 14 Gy, UHDR under K/X produced a marked survival advantage: by day 14, 80% of animals had not reached the weight-loss endpoint versus 40% after CDR K/X; no FLASH benefit was discernible with ISO anesthesia. Raising the dose to 16 Gy accentuated these trends; 40% of UHDR K/X mice were still below the endpoint at study termination, whereas all CDR K/X mice met it by day 7. Again, ISO abolished sparing at both dose rates. To probe mechanism, intraperitoneal oxygen tension was measured with an optical reporter in six mice. ISO anesthesia yielded significantly higher pO₂ (62 ± 4 mmHg) than K/X (26 ± 10 mmHg), a 2.5-fold difference.These findings identify anesthetic-dependent oxygenation as a reproducible confounder in preclinical FLASH studies: elevated pO₂ under ISO negates abdominal sparing, whereas K/X preserves it across two clinically relevant doses. Rigorous control and reporting of factors that alter tissue oxygenation are therefore essential when designing experiments and, ultimately, translating FLASH radiotherapy.

Keywords: UHDR, flash, Anesthesia, Oxygen, Total abdominal irradiation

Received: 15 Jul 2025; Accepted: 13 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tavakkoli, Daley, Hunter, Allen, Carpenter, Gladstone, Pogue and Hoopes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Armin Tavakkoli, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.