ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Thoracic Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1667205
This article is part of the Research TopicNovel Theragnostic Approaches in Thoracic MalignanciesView all articles
Analysis of short-term clinical efficacy and immune function changes of advanced non-small cell lung cancer after radiotherapy or chemotherapy under CT-guided 125Ⅰseed implantation
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Intervention, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China
- 2Department of Radiology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, 6 Jiefang Street, Dalian, 116001, People's Republic of China., Dalian, China
- 3Department of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and changes in immune status of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with disease progression after chemoradiotherapy treated with CT-guided 125I radioactive seed implantation. Materials and Methods: From January 2016 to June 2022, 34 NSCLC patients who progressed after radiotherapy and chemotherapy were studied retrospectively. There were 34 evaluable lesions, and 125 I seeds were implanted into the lesions under CT guidance. The study's endpoints were as follows: Short-term clinical efficacy, quality of life score, and adverse reaction status assessment, with patients being collected for immune status assessment. Results: The average postoperative follow-up period was 16.58 ± 7.41 months. The one-year postoperative survival rate was 76.47% (26/34), the two-year postoperative survival rate was 58.82% (20/34), and the median overall survival was 16 (6–24) months(95% CI:13.7-18.3 ); one-year PFS after operation The rate was 61.76% (21/34), the two-year PFS rate was 41.18% (14/34), and the median PFS was 12.5 (1–24) months(95% CI:10.8-16.2). Postoperative pneumothorax occurred in 11.76% of patients, minor bleeding in 5.88%, and pneumonia in 2.94%, all of which improved after symptomatic treatment. Compared with the preoperative results, the percentage of CD3+ and CD4+T lymphocytes in the treatment group increased 1、2、3 and 6 months after surgery, and the percentage of NK cells increased 3 and 6 months after surgery. Positive immune factor levels of IL-2 and TNF-α were increased at 2、3 and 6 months after surgery, γ-IFN levels were increased at 1、2、3 and 6 months after surgery, IL-4 levels were decreased at 3 and 6 months after surgery, and IL-10 levels were decreased at 6 months after surgery. TH17 (IL-17) levels decreased at 1、2、3and 6 months after surgery. Conclusion: CT-guided 125Ⅰparticle therapy may be an effective treatment for NSCLC that has progressed following radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Local treatments improve patients' quality of life and reduce tumor burden. Ct-guided 125I radioactive seed implantation may improve the immune status of patients with recurrent or progressive NSCLC after radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and enhance the anti-tumor immune response.
Keywords: Non-small cell lung cancer, 125I seed, clinical efficacy, Peripheral T ymphocyte cells, Cytokines
Received: 16 Jul 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kou, Chen, Yuan, Zhao, Zhou, Wang, Wang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Chuang Li, lichuang1001@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.