Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Oncol., 26 November 2025

Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Cancers

Volume 15 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1670234

This article is part of the Research TopicIntrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Emerging Insights from Pathobiology to Clinical Translation – Innovative Strategies, Challenges, and OpportunitiesView all 13 articles

Case Report: A case of intrahepatic papillary neoplasm of the bile duct with invasive carcinoma in a young patient and review of the literature

Linhui Hu&#x;Linhui Hu1†Hua Wan&#x;Hua Wan1†Yuan HongYuan Hong1Li LiangLi Liang2Yan Wang*Yan Wang1*
  • 1Department of Infectious Disease, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 2Department of Pathology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China

Introduction: Intrahepatic papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) with invasive carcinoma is a rare cholangiocarcinoma with the most frequent site of origin being intrahepatic bile ducts. Given its rarity and non-specific clinical presentations, accurate diagnosis plagues clinicians to improve patient outcomes.

Case presentation: We present a case of a 31-year-old male who initially exhibited fever. Routine ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) revealed a large mass in the right liver lobe, suggesting a high likelihood of an infectious lesion. However, multidisciplinary discussion offered a variety of possible scenarios. The patient subsequently underwent an extended right hepatectomy (ERH), and histopathological examination suggested a intrahepatic IPNB with invasive adenocarcinoma.

Clinical discussion: The diagnosis and management of IPNB remain challenging, particularly in patients who present with atypical clinical symptoms and lack significant abnormalities in laboratory tests. Early imaging plays a critical role in guiding the diagnostic process. However, comprehensive diagnostic speculations, clinical expertise, and even invasive detections are essential for establishing a definitive diagnosis and determining the appropriate treatment strategy. Given the potential to invasive carcinoma, early detection and resection are vital to improving prognosis.

Introduction

Intraductal papillary neoplasm (IPNB) and its associated invasive carcinoma are biliary epithelial tumors with papillary or villous growths in the bile ducts, characterized by a fibrovascular core in the dilated bile ducts, partially combined with mucus secretion (1). IPNB is mainly found in the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts and can therefore be divided into intrahepatic intraductal papillary neoplasms (I-IPNB) and extrahepatic intraductal papillary neoplasms (E-IPNB) (1). Hepatic bile duct stones and Treponema pallidum infection are currently considered to be associated with the etiology of IPNB (2). The clinical manifestations of IPNB are mostly non-specific (3). Early and radical resection is an optimal option in patients with imaging diagnoses of IPNB to achieve a satisfactory outcome (4). Due to the low incidence, its etiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic methods, and histopathological features have not been fully determined.

This report describes a 31-year-old man with recurrent fever who was ultimately diagnosed with I-IPNB associated with invasive carcinoma.

Presentation of case

A 31-year-old male with a history of hepatic cysts and hepatic cystectomy in 2007 was admitted due to intermittent fever for 2 months, with a maximum temperature of 39.9 °C. No accompanying symptoms, such as cough, sputum, abdominal pain, diarrhea, jaundice, and abdominal discomfort, were presented. The abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) results on October 27, 2023, revealed a huge lesion (11cm×10.6cm×12.1cm) in the right liver lobe with septations, calcifications, and heterogeneous enhancement.

After admission, abdominal ultrasound (Figures 1A, B) results showed a heterogeneous hypoechoic area in the right lobe of the liver (14.9×11.6 cm) with unclear boundaries, and multiple internal anechoic areas. No dilation of the intra- or extrahepatic bile ducts was observed. The epigastric enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, Figures 2A–C) (2023-12-10) result showed a huge multicompartmental cystic solid lesion (11.6×11.3×11.6cm) in the right lobe of the liver with clear borders, and mild enhancement of the margins and internal septum, and a liquid fat suppression T2-weighted imaging (fsT2WI) high signal was seen in its interior. Abdominal and pelvic contrast-enhanced CT (Figures 3A–C) results showed that a large cystic and solid lesion was detected in the lower part of the right lobe, measuring approximately 13.4×12.6×12.1 cm with clear margins. The examinations of the blood routine and biochemistry showed normal findings. The inflammatory markers were elevated (C-reactive protein: 12.51 mg/L, erythrocyte sedimentation rate: 48 mm/1 h, interleukin 6: 7.15 pg/mL, procalcitonin: 0.06 ng/mL). However, liver and kidney functions as well as tumor markers were within the normal range. Antibodies to hepatitis A, B, C, D, and E viruses, cytomegalovirus/Epstein–Barr virus, Leishmania donovani, hepatic echinococcosis, Borrelia burgdorferi, antinuclear antibodies, antibody to autoimmune liver diseases, serum copper blue protein, stool search for amoebic trophozoites, and encapsulated bodies were normal.

Figure 1
Ultrasound images labeled A and B. Image A displays a grayscale ultrasound scan with various anatomical structures visible. Image B is similar but includes a color Doppler overlay showing blood flow in blue and red, indicating different flow directions or velocities. Both images have measurement data and settings displayed on the screen.

Figure 1. Ultrasound images. In (A, B) a heterogeneous hypoechoic area measuring 14.9×11.6 cm is visible in the right lobe of the liver, with unclear boundaries. Multiple anechoic areas are present within it, and no dilation of the intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts is observed.

Figure 2
Three MRI scans labeled A, B, and C show cross-sections of the abdomen. Each image highlights different tissue contrasts and patterns, possibly indicating varied medical conditions or stages.

Figure 2. Contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI. (A–C) show T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), fsT2WI, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), respectively. A large multiloculated cystic-solid mass is noted in the right hepatic lobe, appearing hypointense on T1WI and heterogeneously hyperintense on fat-saturated T2WI, with mildly hyperintense signal on DWI. The lesion measures approximately 11.6 cm × 11.3 cm × 11.6 cm. Contrast-enhanced imaging shows mild enhancement of the peripheral rim and internal septa. Fluid components exhibit hyperintensity on fs T2WI, and nodular or flake-like projections are visible along the inner wall of some cystic portions.

Figure 3
CT scan images of the abdomen in three panels. Panel A shows a liver and stomach cross-section with a tumor on the liver. Panel B displays a slightly different angle of the same cross-section. Panel C shows further progression of the tumor.

Figure 3. Abdominal and pelvic contrast-enhanced CT. In (A–C) the liver is normal in size and morphology. A large cystic-solid mass in the inferior right hepatic lobe contains multiple calcifications and measures approximately 13.4 cm × 12.6 cm × 12.1 cm. The lesion is well circumscribed and supplied by a branch of the hepatic artery. On multiphase contrast-enhanced imaging, the periphery and septa of the mass show enhancement, while internal low-density areas remain non-enhancing. No intra- or extrahepatic biliary dilatation is observed.

Our multidisciplinary consultation suggested suspected diagnoses including biliary cystadenocarcinoma, chronic liver abscess, or atypical hepatic echinococcosis. A liver biopsy was required to collect liver tissue for pathological examination, bacterial culture, fungal culture, and biochemistry tests. Thereafter, a pathological report of liver biopsy (Figures 4A, B) indicated degenerated necrotic tissue with a large number of neutrophils and eosinophilic infiltration, and a minority of free cuboidal epithelium.

Figure 4
Panel A shows a histological slide with a large aggregation of densely packed cells stained in purple, distributed across the slide. Panel B presents a closer view of a similar cell aggregation with individual cells more discernibly outlined, focusing on a structure resembling a gland or duct at the bottom. Both panels depict tissue samples under a microscope for detailed cellular study.

Figure 4. Pathology of liver puncture biopsy. (A) shows degenerative necrosis, infiltration of neutrophils and eosinophils, and a small amount of cuboidal epithelium in the biopsy tissue. (B) reveals a small amount of cuboidal epithelium with enlarged nuclei and slightly darker chromatin staining, with no granulomatous lesions observed.

In anticipation of definitive surgical treatment, the patient ultimately underwent an extended right hepatectomy (ERH) at our center (Figure 5). The pathological examination revealed a large cystic and solid nodule (14×12×8 cm)with intrahepatic bile duct dilation, papillary hyperplasia of the biliary epithelium, and moderate to severe cellular atypia. Surrounding tumor cells exhibited glandular, band-like and nest-like infiltration, mucin production, and extensive necrosis (Figures 6A–I). Immunohistochemistry: CK7 (+++), CK20 (+), CK19 (+++), CDX-2 (weak +), GPC3 (−), hepatocyte (−), p53 (+), Ki67 (25%). Mismatch repair proteins: MLH1 (nuclear +), MSH2 (nuclear +), MSH6 (nuclear +), PMS2 (nuclear +) (Figures 6J, K). Based on these findings, the diagnosis was intrahepatic papillary neoplasm with infiltrative adenocarcinoma (pancreaticobiliary differentiation), with invasion of the gallbladder, vascular tumor thrombus, and lymph node metastasis.

Figure 5
A close-up of a large, excised tumor with a red and dark appearance, showing various textures and colors. It rests on a surgical tray, with medical cloth visible in the background.

Figure 5. Surgical excision of postoperative tissue.

Figure 6
Histological slides labeled A to K show various tissue samples stained to highlight cellular structures. Arrows in panels D, E, F, G, and H indicate specific regions of interest, such as cell clusters or structural abnormalities. Panels J and K display tissue sections with darker staining, indicating the presence of specific proteins or cell types. Each slide exhibits different patterns and densities relevant for microscopic analysis.

Figure 6. (A, B) show cystic solid area: papillary/villous, complex structure, invasive carcinoma, and predominantly bile duct type. (C) shows solid area structurally complex, invasive carcinoma with adenocarcinoma with mucus production. (D) shows peripheral hepatic tissue infiltration. (E) shows peripheral hepatic tissue choroidal carcinoma embolus. (F) shows nerve invasion of peripheral hepatic tissue. (G, H) show invasion of the outer membrane layer of the gallbladder wall, muscularis propria, and chorioallantoic embolus. (I) shows 1 hilar lymph node with cancer metastasis. (J, K) show the immunohistochemistry results, with positive staining for CK19 and CK7.

Postoperative PET/CT showed that multiple lymph nodes in the right cardiophrenic angle and right parasternal region had increased glucose metabolism, likely representing metastasis. Within 1 year following discharge, the patient’s condition progressively worsened. Despite undergoing a series of chemotherapy treatments, the patient ultimately succumbed to the illness.

Discussion

IPNB is more common in East Asian countries (including Japan, Korea, China, and Taiwan) than in Western countries. Its multistage carcinogenesis is regarded to be a mechanism by which chronic inflammation leads to biliary tract cancer (1). Risk factors for IPNB include hepatic bile duct stones, Chinese testicular schistosomiasis infection, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and biliary tract malformations (choledochal cysts and familial adenomatous polyposis or Gardner’s syndrome) (2). The demographic data indicate that patients are 35 to 91 years old with a slight male predominance (5). IPNB includes I-IPNB and E-IPNB, and of these, E-IPNB has a high incidence of malignancy (6). I-IPNB most often occurs in the left half of the liver as a multifocal papillary or cystic or cystic-solid lesion growing into the lumen. Our patient was a 31-year-old young male with a history of hepatic cysts and hepatic cystectomy. I-IPNB with invasive carcinoma was removed after right hemihepatectomy, but his prognosis was poor due to metastasis.

Based on the Japanese–Korean consensus, IPNB has been subdivided into two types: type 1 is the prototype of “classic IPNB”, and type 2 is the prototype of “so-called papillary or cholangiocarcinoma” (7). There are four pathological subtypes of IPNB: intestinal, gastric, pancreaticobiliary, and eosinophilic, with the intestinal type being more common in Asia and the pancreaticobiliary type being more common in the United States and Europe (8, 9). In the present case, the pathology suggested a pancreatobiliary type.

The clinical manifestations of patients with IPNB with invasive carcinoma are non-specific and depend mainly on the location of the tumor (3). The typical clinical manifestations are right upper abdominal pain, jaundice, fever, and acute cholangitis, but there are a certain number of asymptomatic cases (10). In terms of laboratory tests, patients with type 2 IPNBs have significantly higher levels of liver enzymes, bile enzymes, and tumor markers than patients with type 1 IPNBs. Preoperative diagnosis of IPNBs relies on imaging, which typically shows biliary dilatation, intraluminal mucus, and protruding into the lumen of the canaliculi. CT and MRI are the most commonly used imaging modalities, and the latter has the advantage of distinguishing benign from malignant lesions (11, 12). CT showed bile duct dilatation in 98.2% and an intraductal mass in 92.9% of cases, with IPNB enhancing to iso or hyper attenuation in the late arterial phase and becoming isoattenuating in the portal venous and delayed phases (10). On MRI scans, these structures are usually low signal on T1W1 and relatively high signal on T2W1 and DW1 (10). MRI combined with MR cholangiography reliably distinguishes invasive IPNB from intraepithelial neoplasia. Intraductal mass visualization, tumor diameter ≥2.5 cm, multifocality, bile duct wall thickening, and adjacent-organ invasion are independent imaging predictors of shorter recurrence-free survival (11). However, the lack of typical clinical manifestations, laboratory data, and imaging manifestations in this case poses a challenge to its diagnosis. In the setting of fever and compatible imaging features, a limited differential diagnosis for the hepatic lesions should be systematically considered.

1. IPNB

IPNB typically manifests as intermittent right-upper-quadrant pain, fever, cholangitis, or jaundice, but 12% of patients are asymptomatic (10). Serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) correlates with tumor burden yet lacks diagnostic specificity (10). Histological appearance varies with subtype, mucin production, atypia grade, extent of invasion, and biliary location (10). Definitive diagnosis of IPNB requires postoperative histopathology, so multimodal imaging should be used preoperatively to maximize diagnostic accuracy.

2. Mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) of the liver

MCN arises almost exclusively in the pancreatic body and tail of middle-aged women and invariably harbors ovarian type stroma (13). MCNs are mucin-containing mediastinal cystic tumors or columnar epithelium with ovarian-like mesenchyme between the endo-epithelial lining and the outer connective tissue peritoneum; MCNs usually have no upstream biliary dilatation (14, 15). The lesions are not connected to the bile ducts, and calcification of the cystic wall is usually seen (15). Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, the malignant form of MCN, shows a higher rate of invasive carcinoma in men than in women, and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS FNA) is recommended when imaging findings are equivocal (13).

3. Liver worm disease

Imaging mainly shows hepatic cystic space-occupying lesions, with solid or cystic solid masses of mixed density in the liver, and no abnormal enhancement, and some of them can be seen with characteristic small vesicles and calcification (16).

4. Bacterial liver abscess

Liver abscess is characterized by severe systemic toxicity and pronounced leukocytosis (17). Typical CT findings of liver abscesses include central liquefactive necrosis, the presence of an air-fluid level within the abscess cavity, and a surrounding “ring-target” sign (18).

5. Simple hepatic cysts

Simple hepatic cysts have thin and smooth cystic walls, no nodules within the lesion, no calcifications, homogeneous cystic fluid, and no communication with the intrahepatic bile ducts (11).

In patients with suspected IPNB on imaging, early surgery is desirable to achieve radical resection.

IPNB has different characteristics for different lesion sites (intrahepatic and extrahepatic) and tumor properties (dysplastic and invasive carcinoma). Surgical resection should be performed in patients without any evidence of distant metastases (19). If the intrahepatic lesion is too large to be completely resected, preoperative portal vein embolization may be performed to induce hypertrophy of the residual liver (20). Liver transplantation has been shown to result in good survival in cases of bilateral involvement or end-stage liver disease that cannot be partially resected (21). When major surgery is not required, adjuvant therapy includes chemotherapy, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, percutaneous cholangioscopic laser ablation, and iridium-192 endoluminal therapy (22). In our patient, the gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen started immediately after major hepatectomy, but the prognosis was poor due to metastasis.

Conclusion

In the present case, the patient was febrile yet liver function tests and serum tumor markers alpha fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and CA19-9 were all within normal limits. Concurrently, no typical imaging findings, i.e., neither a solid mass component nor a hepatic bile duct stone, was observed, and no dilation of the intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts was observed. After pathological diagnosis, it was confirmed as an invasive cancer associated with biliary papillomatosis. 17 years ago, the patient underwent resection of a right hepatic cyst, during which multiple septated lesions within the liver with thick walls and abundant blood flow signals were discovered. These septated lesions could progress with bile stasis and recurrent infections, probably leading to malignant transformation. The patient remained asymptomatic for 17 years after the hepatic cyst surgery and consequently did not adhere to regular follow-up. IPNB with characteristics of large cystic masses or liver abscesses are rare (23). This reminds us to remain vigilant with complex hepatic cysts with thick walls. This case highlights the importance of thorough preliminary imaging analysis, pathological diagnosis, and leveraging extensive clinical experience to guide assumptions and examinations, especially for patients with atypical presentations.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

This present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant/patient(s) for thepublication of this case report.

Author contributions

LH: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HW: Visualization, Writing – review & editing. YH: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. LL: Visualization, Writing – review & editing. YW: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the patients for the support given in providing the data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The handling editor ZL declared a shared parent affiliation with the author(s) at the time of review.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CT, computed tomography; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; E-IPNB, extrahepatic intraductal papillary neoplasms; EUS FNA, EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration; ERH, extend right hepatectomy; fsT2WI, fat suppression T2-weighted imaging; IPNB, intrahepatic papillary neoplasm of the bile duct; I-IPNB, intrahepatic intraductal papillary neoplasms; MCN, mucinous cystic neoplasm; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; T1WI, T1-weighted imaging.

References

1. Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, Paradis V, Rugge M, Schirmacher P, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology. (2020) 76:182–8. doi: 10.1111/his.13975

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Lee SS, Kim MH, Lee SK, Jang SJ, Song MH, Kim KP, et al. Clinicopathologic review of 58 patients with biliary papillomatosis. Cancer. (2004) 100:783–93. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20031

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Wang M, Deng BY, Wen TF, Peng W, Li C, Trishul NM, et al. An observational and comparative study on intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the biliary tract and the pancreas from a Chinese cohort. Clinics Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. (2016) 40:161–8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2015.12.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Lim JH, Yi CA, Lim HK, Lee WJ, Lee SJ, Kim SH, et al. Radiological spectrum of intraductal papillary tumors of the bile ducts. Korean J Radiol. (2002) 3:57–63. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2002.3.1.57

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Kim JR, Jang KT, and Jang JY. Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: review of updated clinicopathological and imaging characteristics. Br J Surg. (2023) 110:1229–40. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad202

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Han SY, Kim DU, Nam HS, Kang DH, Jang SI, Lee DK, et al. Comparison of the Malignant predictors in intrahepatic and extrahepatic intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct. J Clin Med. (2022) 11:1985. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071985

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Nakanuma Y, Jang KT, Fukushima N, Furukawa T, Hong SM, Kim H, et al. A statement by the Japan-Korea expert pathologists for future clinicopathological and molecular analyses toward consensus building of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct through several opinions at the present stage. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. (2018) 25:181–7. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.532

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Gordon-Weeks AN, Jones K, Harriss E, Smith A, and Silva M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of current experience in treating IPNB: clinical and pathological correlates. Ann Surg. (2016) 263:656–63. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001426

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Rocha FG, Lee H, Katabi N, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, D'Angelica MI, et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: a biliary equivalent to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas? Hepatol (Baltimore Md). (2012) 56:1352–60. doi: 10.1002/hep.25786

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Nakanuma Y, Uesaka K, Kakuda Y, Sugino T, Kubota K, Furukawa T, et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasm of bile duct: updated clinicopathological characteristics and molecular and genetic alterations. J Clin Med. (2020) 9:3991. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123991

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Lee S, Kim MJ, Kim S, Choi D, Jang KT, Park YN, et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: Assessment of invasive carcinoma and long-term outcomes using MRI. J Hepatol. (2019) 70:692–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.12.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Aslam A, Wasnik AP, Shi J, Sahai V, and Mendiratta-Lala M. Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB): CT and MRI appearance with radiology-pathology correlation. Clin Imaging. (2020) 66:10–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.036

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Tomishima K, Fujisawa T, Fukumura Y, Ushio M, Sato S, Amano N, et al. Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas with cyst infection in a male patient. Internal Med (Tokyo Japan). (2020) 59:2383–9. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4937-20

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Chen TC, Nakanuma Y, Zen Y, Chen MF, Jan YY, Yeh TS, et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasia of the liver associated with hepatolithiasis. Hepatol (Baltimore Md). (2001) 34:651–8. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.28199

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Zen Y, Pedica F, Patcha VR, Capelli P, Zamboni G, Casaril A, et al. Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the liver: a clinicopathological study and comparison with intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct. Modern pathology: an Off J United States Can Acad Pathology Inc. (2011) 24:1079–89. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.71

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Govindasamy A, Bhattarai PR, and John J. Liver cystic echinococcosis: a parasitic review. Ther Adv Infect Dis. (2023) 10:20499361231171478. doi: 10.1177/20499361231171478

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Dudina M, Olesen SS, Søgaard KK, and Nielsen HL. Pyogenic liver abscess in the North Denmark Region - a population-based cohort study (2010-2022). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect diseases: Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol. (2025). doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05307-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Yuan T, Zhong T, and Song J. Vascular penetration sign: dual-phase enhanced CT manifestations of atypical liver abscess caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Eur Radiol. (2025) 35:4685–91. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11460-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Chatterjee A, Lopes Vendrami C, Nikolaidis P, Mittal PK, Bandy AJ, Menias CO, et al. Uncommon intraluminal tumors of the gallbladder and biliary tract: spectrum of imaging appearances. Radiographics: Rev Publ Radiological Soc North America Inc. (2019) 39:388–412. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180164

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Watanabe A, Suzuki H, Kubo N, Araki K, Kobayashi T, Sasaki S, et al. An oncocytic variant of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct that formed a giant hepatic cyst. Rare tumors. (2013) 5:e30. doi: 10.4081/rt.2013.e30

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Pérez Saborido B, Bailón Cuadrado M, Rodríguez López M, Asensio Díaz E, Madrigal Rubiales B, Barrera Rebollo A, et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasia of the bile duct with Malignancy: a differentiated entity of cholangiocarcinoma with a better prognosis. A Rev three New cases Rev Esp Enferm Dig. (2017) 109:592–5. doi: 10.17235/reed.2017.4835/2016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Tan Y, Milikowski C, Toribio Y, Singer A, Rojas CP, Garcia-Buitrago MT, et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts: A case report and literature review. World J Gastroenterol. (2015) 21:12498–504. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12498

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Fu C, Jin H, Wang Y, and Xu H. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatments of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: a case report and literature review. Front Med (Lausanne). (2024) 11:1443599. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1443599

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: intrahepatic papillary neoplasm of the bile duct, diagnosis, prognosis, fever, carcinoma

Citation: Hu L, Wan H, Hong Y, Liang L and Wang Y (2025) Case Report: A case of intrahepatic papillary neoplasm of the bile duct with invasive carcinoma in a young patient and review of the literature. Front. Oncol. 15:1670234. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1670234

Received: 21 July 2025; Accepted: 10 November 2025; Revised: 27 October 2025;
Published: 26 November 2025.

Edited by:

Zhao Li, Peking University People’s Hospital, China

Reviewed by:

Tadashi Tsukamoto, Osaka City General Hospital, Japan
Darren Carpizo, University of Rochester Medical Center, United States

Copyright © 2025 Hu, Wan, Hong, Liang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yan Wang, d2FuZ3lhbndhbmdAMTI2LmNvbQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.