ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Breast Cancer
Toxicity profiles of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors: safety analysis from clinical trials and the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
Provisionally accepted- 1Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- 2Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- 3Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- 4Department of Pharmacy, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Aims This study aimed to evaluate the comprehensive safety profile of CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer treatment by analyzing real-world adverse event (AE) data and systematically reviewing clinical trial findings to provide evidence-based safety guidance. Methods A disproportionality analysis based on real-world data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) was combined with a systematic review to evaluate adverse events (AEs) associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Sixteen studies involving 6,722 patients with advanced breast cancer were included to analyze the toxicity risks of CDK4/6 inhibitor combination therapies. Temporal patterns of AEs were assessed using FAERS data, and signal strengths were determined using the reporting odds ratio (ROR). Results Combination therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors significantly increased the risk of grade 3-5 AEs. FAERS analysis revealed that most AEs occurred within the first month of treatment, with the lowest incidence between the second and sixth months, followed by a significant rise thereafter. All CDK4/6 inhibitors were associated with myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, interstitial lung disease (ILD), and QT prolongation. Disproportionality analysis for "Torsade de pointes/QT prolongation" identified Ribociclib as the only agent with a strong positive signal (ROR 6.16, 95% CI 5.54–6.84). Additionally, unexpected AEs such as peripheral neuropathy, taste disorders, and epistaxis were detected. Conclusion Clinicians should prioritize monitoring for myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, and QT prolongation (particularly with Ribociclib) during the first month of CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. Long-term surveillance beyond six months is crucial to detect delayed-onset AEs.
Keywords: CDK4/6, inhibitors, Toxicity, profiles, Pharmacovigilance, network, Meta, Pharmacoepidemiology
Received: 05 Aug 2025; Accepted: 14 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhou, Lin, Wang, Xie, Hu and Cai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jiaqin Cai, jiaqincai@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
