Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Radiation Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1677439

This article is part of the Research TopicTechnology Developments in Proton TherapyView all 9 articles

A Novel Approach for Proton Therapy Pencil Beam Scanning Patient Specific Quality Assurance Using an Integrated Detector System and 3D Dose Reconstruction

Provisionally accepted
Joseph  J. BatemanJoseph J. Bateman1*Sonia  Escribano-RodriguezSonia Escribano-Rodriguez1Samuel  FlynnSamuel Flynn2,3Tony  PriceTony Price3Raffaella  RadognaRaffaella Radogna4Saad  ShaikhSaad Shaikh1Harry  BarnettHarry Barnett1Connor  GoddenConnor Godden1Febian  FebianFebian Febian1Matthew  WarrenMatthew Warren1Catherine  BurneCatherine Burne3Alison  WarryAlison Warry5Lee  Harrison-CareyLee Harrison-Carey5Colin  BakerColin Baker5Simon  JollySimon Jolly1
  • 1University College London, London, United Kingdom
  • 2National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom
  • 3School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • 4University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
  • 5University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Current proton beam therapy patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) methods rely on time-intensive phantom measurements or machine-reported parameters without independent verification. This work presents an integrated detector system for phantom-less Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) PSQA, providing independent spot-by-spot measurements of all critical beam parameters and 3D dose reconstruction. The integrated detector combines three separate systems: a scintillator range telescope for range and energy measurement; a CMOS pixel sensor for spot position and size verification; and a Transmission Calorimeter (TC) for beam intensity measurements. Measured parameters feed Monte Carlo simulations to reconstruct 3D dose distributions for comparison with treatment planning predictions. Validation was performed at UCLH using single spot position spread out Bragg Peak (SOBP) and 5×5×10 spot box field configurations. Energy values obtained from range measurements showed strong correlation with DICOM values (R^2 > 0.998) with an accuracy of between 2.17 mm and 1.23 mm for different beam deliveries. CMOS pixel sensor measurements succeeded for single spot fields but experienced saturation at higher intensities and incomplete coverage for the larger box field. The TC demonstrated excellent dose linearity (R2 = 1.000). Monte Carlo reconstructions agreed well with reference simulations for longitudinal profiles, though lateral reconstructions proved challenging with 77% gamma pass rates (2%/2mm) for the box field. This proof-of-concept demonstrates feasibility of independent beam parameter verification for PBS PSQA while maintaining patient geometry. The approach offers advantages over current methods but requires resolution of energy calibration offsets and detector limitations before clinical implementation. Future work will address these challenges and expand validation to clinical treatment plans.

Keywords: Proton therapy, Pencil beam scanning, Patient specific quality assurance, Integrated Detector System, 3D Dose Reconstruction, Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) PSQA, scintillator range telescope, CMOS pixel sensor

Received: 31 Jul 2025; Accepted: 15 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bateman, Escribano-Rodriguez, Flynn, Price, Radogna, Shaikh, Barnett, Godden, Febian, Warren, Burne, Warry, Harrison-Carey, Baker and Jolly. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Joseph J. Bateman, joe.bateman@ucl.ac.uk

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.