Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention

This article is part of the Research TopicCancer Burden and Cancer Screening Strategies in AsiaView all 6 articles

Effect of colonoscopy screening on the risk of colorectal cancer in China: a follow-up study

Provisionally accepted
Yunxin  KongYunxin Kong1De  LiuDe Liu2Yue  MaYue Ma1Zongmei  DongZongmei Dong2Yiran  WangYiran Wang1Xiaohu  LuoXiaohu Luo1Hongying  ZhaoHongying Zhao1Rui  JinRui Jin3Siyuan  GaoSiyuan Gao3Guihua  ZhangGuihua Zhang1Dong  DongDong Dong1*Pan  ZhangPan Zhang2*Lang  ZhuoLang Zhuo3*
  • 1Xuzhou Cancer Hospital, Xuzhou, China
  • 2Xuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xuzhou, China
  • 3Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

ABSTRACT Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for CRC screening, but its effectiveness in population-based programs requires further evaluation. Methods: We conducted a follow-up study in Xuzhou, China. Participants were recruited from 2014 to 2021, with follow-up continuing until December 2023. The study comprised two components: 1) an active follow-up to assess treatment outcomes for patients with colorectal advanced neoplasia (CAN) detected during screening; 2) a passive follow-up to compare CRC incidence and mortality between participants who underwent colonoscopy and those who refused it. Results: The the active follow-up included 196 participants, while 15,440 were included the passive follow-up (4,029 in the colonoscopy group and 11,411 in the non-colonoscopy group). 96.43% (189/196) CAN patients were actively followed. However, only 25.93% (49/189) received treatment. The CRC incidence density was 35.77 per 100,000 person-years in the colonoscopy group, which was significantly lower than the 95.50 per 100,000 in the non-colonoscopy group (IRR=0.37, P=0.011). 83.33% (5/6) of the CRC cases in the colonoscopy group were from the subgroup of CAN patients who did not receive treatment. There was no significant difference in CRC mortality between the two groups. Conclusions: Colonoscopy screening is effective in reducing the risk of CRC. However, its real-world effectiveness has been compromised by the low participation rate and the poor treatment adherence among screen-positive patients. The impact of

Keywords: Colorectal neoplasm, Mass Screening, Colonoscopy, Incidence, Mortality

Received: 20 Aug 2025; Accepted: 30 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Kong, Liu, Ma, Dong, Wang, Luo, Zhao, Jin, Gao, Zhang, Dong, Zhang and Zhuo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Dong Dong, ddong2002@163.com
Pan Zhang, 297166200@qq.com
Lang Zhuo, zhuolang@xzhmu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.