Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1689820

This article is part of the Research TopicNew Strategies and Clinical Translation Progress in Immunotherapy for Liver CancerView all articles

Navigating the Risks: A systematic review of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy before liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma and its impact on allograft rejection and survival outcomes

Provisionally accepted
Donghua  LiuDonghua LiuXinyi  WangXinyi WangXuelian  LiuXuelian LiuJing  LiJing Li*
  • The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: The administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) prior to liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been reported. Several studies suggest that ICIs may elevate the risk of allograft rejection (AR) and influence other clinical outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pre-LT ICI treatment in HCC patients. 2 Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science for retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining pre-LT ICI therapies in HCC patients. Random-effects models were employed to evaluate treatment effects on allograft rejection (AR), complete recovery rate among patients with AR, graft loss, HCC recurrence, and progression-free survival (PFS). Common-effects models were used to assess overall mortality and AR-related mortality. Study quality was evaluated using the JBI critical appraisal tools. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024616267). Results: Studies involving HCC patients receiving pre-LT ICIs for downstaging or bridging were included. After screening databases from inception to December 31, 2024, eight studies (n = 229 patients) were included. The studies had diverse designs and were primarily from China and the US. The pooled post-LT AR rate across all eight studies was 19% (95% CI: 12%–30%). The incidence of AR was 24% in the PD-L1 inhibitor group, 18% in the PD-1 inhibitor group, and 20% in the bispecific/combination therapies group. The complete recovery rate among patients with AR was 78% (95% CI: 59%–97%), and graft loss occurred in 4% (95% CI: 1%–7%). The HCC recurrence rate across six studies was 24% (95% CI: 12%–36%). The pooled median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 17.63 months (95% CI: 11.57–23.69 months). Overall mortality was 8% (95% CI: 4%–12%), and AR-related mortality was 2% (95% CI: 0%–5%). Sensitivity analysis supported the robustness of the results, while funnel plots indicated potential publication bias for several outcomes. This meta-analysis offers a comprehensive synthesis of the impact of pre-LT ICIs on post-transplantation outcomes. Conclusion: The use of ICIs as bridging or downstaging therapy prior to liver transplantation in HCC patients appears feasible.

Keywords: Hepatocellular Carcinoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors, liver transplant, allograft rejection, Meta-analysis

Received: 20 Aug 2025; Accepted: 10 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Wang, Liu and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jing Li, lijing197212@126.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.