ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions
This article is part of the Research TopicPrecision Medical Imaging for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Volume IIIView all 5 articles
An interpretable 18F-FDG PET/CT-based radiomics model for predicting sub-3cm solitary adrenal metastases in cancer patients
Provisionally accepted- 1The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- 2Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Purpose: To evaluate the potential of an interpretable radiomics model based on 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting adrenal metastases (AMs) in cancer patients with indeterminate adrenal nodules. Materials and Methods: A total of 177 patients with extra-adrenal malignancies and indeterminate adrenal nodules (74 metastases; 103 benign lesions) were included and randomly assigned to training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. Radiomics features were extracted separately from the CT and PET components of PET/CT examinations. LASSO and multivariate LR were used to identify independent predictive radiomics factors. Based on these features, single-modality CT, PET, and combined PET/CT radiomics models were constructed using four machine learning algorithms: RF, SVM, LR, and DT. The best-performing algorithm for each modality determined through cross-validation was selected to establish the final models. Model performance was assessed using AUC and DCA. DeLong test was used to compare the AUCs between models. Internal validation of the best-performing radiomics model was conducted by bootstrapping to assess potential optimism. SHAP was utilized to interpret the best-performing radiomics model. Results: The optimal algorithms identified were LR for the CT model and SVM for both the PET and integrated PET/CT models. In the testing set, the AUC values were 0.811 (95% CI: 0.694–0.928) for the CT model and 0.879 (95%CI: 0.789– 0.970) for the PET model. The combined PET/CT model integrating both CT and PET radiomics features achieved an AUC of 0.915 (95%CI: 0.834– 0.997), which was significantly higher than that of the CT model alone (p < 0.05). DCA confirmed superior clinical utility of the combined PET/CT model across most threshold probabilities compared to the single-modality models. Bootstrap-corrected internal validation showed an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.919 (95% CI: 0.884-0.964), with minimal observed optimism (0.003, 95% CI: -0.002-0.007). SHAP analysis showed that a texture feature derived from the gray level size zone matrix of PET images was the most significant predictor of AMs. Conclusions: The interpretable radiomics model based on combined PET/CT data provides a non-invasive tool for predicting AMs in cancer patients with indeterminate adrenal nodules. By integrating features from both modalities, this approach significantly improves diagnostic performance.
Keywords: Adrenal metastases1, Indeterminate adrenal nodules2, PET/CT3, radiomics4, machine learning5
Received: 24 Aug 2025; Accepted: 14 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Feng, Wang, Cai, Liu, Liu, Wang, Li, Liu and Cao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jingwqu Li, tslijingwu@163.com
Yongliang Liu, liuyongliang1974@126.com
Lixiu Cao, caolixiu19860301@126.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
