Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1694565

This article is part of the Research TopicData and Precision: AI Leading the Revolution in Immunoradiotherapy for Advanced Malignant TumorsView all articles

Artificial Intelligence Based Evaluation of Prognostic Benefits from Immunotherapy Plus Targeted Therapy With or Without Radiotherapy or TACE in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Provisionally accepted
Yuehong  DengYuehong Deng1*Shiqin  SongShiqin Song1Huarong  ZhaoHuarong Zhao1Yuqian  YangYuqian Yang2*Simin  LuSimin Lu3*Dieting  LiDieting Li4*
  • 1Hejiang County People's Hospital, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
  • 2Chongqing Hygeia Hospital, Chongqing, China
  • 3Luzhou People's Hospital, Luzhou, China
  • 4No 363 Hospital, Chengdu, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and the prognosis of advanced disease is still poor. Immunotherapy plus targeted therapy has reshaped systemic treatment, yet overall efficacy is limited. Increasing evidence suggests that combining systemic therapy with locoregional modalities such as TACE or radiotherapy (RT) may improve survival. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers the potential to refine prognostic prediction and optimize patient selection. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 351 patients with unresectable HCC, divided into three groups: immunotherapy plus targeted therapy (P+T, n=89), P+T combined with TACE (n=154), and P+T combined with RT (n=108). Univariable Cox regression identified prognostic factors, which were incorporated into five AI models. Model performance was evaluated by C-index, Brier score, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration. Results Median overall survival (mOS) was 12.8 months in the P+T group, 19.7 months in the TACE group (P=0.011), and 22.3 months in the RT group (P=0.030). Among the five AI models, RSF showed the best performance (C-index=0.731) with favorable calibration. In time-dependent ROC analysis, the random survival forest (RSF) model achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.844, 0.824, and 0.806 for predicting 6-, 12-, and 24-month survival, respectively. DCA indicated higher net clinical benefit with the RSF model, and calibration plots showed good agreement between predicted and observed survival. Conclusion Immunotherapy plus targeted therapy combined with TACE or RT significantly improved survival in advanced HCC compared with systemic therapy alone. RSF provided superior predictive performance and identified critical prognostic variables, supporting AI-assisted approaches as valuable tools for individualized risk stratification and treatment optimization in advanced HCC.

Keywords: artificial intelligence, Immunotherapy, targeted therapy, Radiotherapy, TACE, Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Received: 28 Aug 2025; Accepted: 17 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Deng, Song, Zhao, Yang, Lu and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yuehong Deng, 1107188806@qq.com
Yuqian Yang, qian460176726@163.com
Simin Lu, meetxiaolz@outlook.com
Dieting Li, lixueting0819@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.