Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Genitourinary Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1708823

Analysis of Treatment Options and Survival Outcomes for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer: A Focus on Androgen Deprivation Therapy

Provisionally accepted
Zhiqiang  LiZhiqiang Li1Shiwei  SunShiwei Sun1,2Chenghao  TanChenghao Tan3Huwei  YanHuwei Yan1Yali  ZhangYali Zhang1Yingzhong  YangYingzhong Yang1*Gengyan  XiongGengyan Xiong1,3*
  • 1Peking University First Hospital Taiyuan Hospital, Taiyuan, China
  • 2Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 3Peking University First Hospital Department of Urology, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Management of localized prostate cancer (PCa) remains challenging in resource-limited settings where access to surgery and radiotherapy is restricted. This study assessed the survival outcomes of patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone compared with other modalities. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with localized PCa treated with ADT at Taiyuan Central Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from 2002 to 2023. Cox regression identified prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Outcomes were compared with SEER database cohorts receiving radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy (RT), or no treatment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Results: Among 86 patients in the ADT cohort, the median follow-up was 2,152.5 days. Median OS was 2,378 days, with 5-year OS, DSS, and PFS rates of 58.4%, 85.2%, and 72.5%, respectively. Cox analysis identified prostate-specific antigen, ISUP grade, and body mass index as independent predictors of PFS. After PSM for age and ISUP grade, the ADT group showed significantly better OS and DSS than RP, RT, or no treatment cohorts in the SEER database. Conclusions: ADT demonstrated favorable survival outcomes compared with RP and RT in elderly patients with high-grade localized PCa. These results highlight ADT as a potential alternative where invasive options are less feasible, providing insights into optimizing treatment strategies for resource-limited settings.

Keywords: androgen deprivation therapy, prostate cancer, Survival, Cox proportional hazards regression, Propensity score matching

Received: 19 Sep 2025; Accepted: 17 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Sun, Tan, Yan, Zhang, Yang and Xiong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yingzhong Yang, yangying_zhong@163.com
Gengyan Xiong, xgy6205@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.