Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Surgical Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1711540

This article is part of the Research TopicRecent Advancements and New Developments in Reconstructive SurgeryView all 12 articles

Experience Sharing of Endoscopy-Assisted Total Mastectomy with and without Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Provisionally accepted
Yidan  LinYidan Lin1Minxue  ZhuangMinxue Zhuang2Hongbin  QiuHongbin Qiu3Wei  ChenWei Chen2Yihui  HeYihui He2Huanhong  ZengHuanhong Zeng2Mengbo  LinMengbo Lin2*Hui  ZhangHui Zhang2*
  • 1Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
  • 2Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
  • 3Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To evaluate safety, efficacy, and aesthetics of endoscopy-assisted total mastectomy endoscope(EATM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients undergoing total mastectomy (2020.12–2023.2), stratified into four groups: conventional total mastectomy (CTM, n=128), EATM (n=46), CTM+IBR (n=17), and EATM+IBR (n=16). Operative metrics and patient-reported outcomes (Breast-Q/Scar-Q) were compared (SPSS 26.0, P<0.05). Results: EATM groups exhibited prolonged operative time compared to CTM (P < 0.05) but demonstrated significant advantages in reduced intraoperative bleeding (median: 50 mL vs. 80 mL), shorter incision length (3.2 cm vs. 8.5 cm), earlier drain removal (5 vs. 8 days), and shorter hospitalization (4 vs. 7 days) (P < 0.05). EATM with IBR (Group D) achieved superior breast tissue preservation and higher patient satisfaction in psychosocial health (Breast-Q score: 78 vs. 65) and scar appearance (Scar-Q score: 8.5 vs. 6.2) compared to conventional approaches (P < 0.05). Complication rates were comparable across groups (9.3% vs. 8.7%, P > 0.05), with only one case of local nipple recurrence and three cases of distant metastasis observed during 27-month follow-up. Conclusion: EATM combined with IBR represents a safe and effective strategy for breast cancer management, balancing oncological safety with enhanced aesthetic outcomes. The technique reduces surgical trauma, accelerates recovery, and improves patient satisfaction, particularly in scar concealment. Despite higher costs and procedural complexity, it is recommended for patients prioritizing both curative and cosmetic goals. Further multicenter studies are warranted to validate long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

Keywords: breast cancer, Endoscopy-assisted, Axillary approach, Total mastectomy, Breast reconstruction

Received: 23 Sep 2025; Accepted: 22 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lin, Zhuang, Qiu, Chen, He, Zeng, Lin and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Mengbo Lin, linmengbo@fjmu.edu.cn
Hui Zhang, drzhanghui@fjmu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.