ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention
This article is part of the Research TopicCancer Burden and Cancer Screening Strategies in AsiaView all 7 articles
Stage-Specific and Regional Trends in Prostate Cancer Incidence in Kazakhstan, 2005–2024
Provisionally accepted- 1Sh Ualikhanov Kokshetau State University, Kokshetau, Kazakhstan
- 2Central Asian Institute for Medical Research, Astana, Kazakhstan
- 3Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention, Bangkok, Thailand
- 4I K Akhunbaev Kyrgyz State Medical Academy, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
- 5Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan
- 6Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
- 7Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan
- 8RSE Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Astana, Kazakhstan
- 9Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Prostate cancer is a leading malignancy among men globally and continues to be a growing concern in Kazakhstan, where evidence regarding its long-term epidemiological trends is limited. Objectives: This study seeks to assess national and regional trends in prostate cancer incidence, stage distribution, and morphological verification in Kazakhstan from 2005 to 2024. Methods: A nationwide observational study utilizing registry data from the Unified Nationwide Electronic Health System was performed. Incident cases (ICD-10 code C61) were examined according to age, geographical region, and stage at diagnosis. The incidence rates were adjusted to the WHO World Standard Population (2000–2025) by age. Joinpoint regression was used to look at temporal trends, and it showed the annual percent change (APC) and the average annual percent change (AAPC) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: From 2005–2024, 21,756 prostate cancer cases were recorded, with a mean age at diagnosis of 69.8 years. The age-standardized incidence rate (ASR) increased from 11.9 to 20.7 per 100,000 men (APC = +2.6%, p = 0.002). Four distinct periods were identified: an early decline (2005–2008), a sharp rise (2008–2016), a downturn (2016–2020), and a renewed increase (2020–2024). Age-specific incidence was negligible below 50 years, peaking at 75–79 years (228.6 per 100,000). Regional analyses revealed heterogeneous trends: monotonic increases in Atyrau, Aktobe, and Almaty (region), contrasted by boom–dip–rebound profiles in Karaganda, Pavlodar, and Almaty City. The proportion of early-stage (I–II) cases rose from 32.8% to 56.9%, while stage III declined from 49.7% to 22.9%; stage IV increased slightly (17.3% → 20.2%). Morphological verification improved nationally (mean ≈ 92%) and plateaued after 2015. Conclusions: Kazakhstan shows an increase in prostate cancer cases, with more cases being diagnosed at an earlier stage but still a lot of cases being diagnosed at a later stage. This is probably due to the PSA screening program from 2013 to 2017, changes in policy since then, and problems with diagnosis during the pandemic. To get better results, we need to improve early detection, timely biopsy pathways, and connections to mortality and survival data.
Keywords: prostate cancer, Kazakhstan, Epidemiology, incidence trends, PSA screening, Joinpoint regression, Stage distribution, Morphological verification
Received: 06 Oct 2025; Accepted: 10 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Igissin, Kudaibergenova, Yermeke, Telmanova, Igissinova, Turebayev, Jexenova, Moldagali, Khairli, Kazhitaev, Dyakov, Baibosynov, Shishkin, Nogoibaeva, Baytelieva, Mamatov, Halimi and Bilyalova. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Zarina Bilyalova, bilyalova.phd@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
