CORRECTION article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Gastric and Esophageal Cancers
Correction: Co-occurrence patterns of esophageal and stomach cancer across 204 countries and territories: a spatial correspondence and systematic analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Department of Oncology, Zhengzhou, China
- 2The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Department of Nephropathy, Zhengzhou University, China
- 3University of Marburg Department of Experimental Orofacial Medicine,, Marburg, Germany
- 4Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Esophageal cancer (EC) and Stomach cancer (SC) are common malignant tumors of the digestive tract worldwide, posing a serious threat to human health (1)(2)(3). According to the latest global cancer statistics GLOBOCAN 2022, EC is the 11th most common cancer and the 7th leading cause of cancer death in the world, while SC is the 5th most common cancer and the 5th leading cause of cancer death in the world (4,5). Histologically, EC can be classified into two major subtypes: the disease burden of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) significantly exceeds that of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in most parts of the world (6). The vast majority of gastric cancers are histologically adenocarcinomas. The development of gastric cancer is closely associated with Helicobacter pylori infection (7). A meta-analysis and guidelines have indicated that H. pylori infection shows no association with ESCC, and may even be inversely associated with EAC (8,9). However, the esophagus and stomach are directly connected anatomically, particularly at the esophagogastric junction, where esophageal adenocarcinoma and gastric cardia cancer exhibit significant overlap in terms of pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and even molecular characteristics. Studies have shown that multiple environmental and behavioral risk factors contribute to the development of both cancers, including smoking, alcohol consumption, high salt intake, consumption of preserved foods, and low fruit and vegetable intake (10). It is worth noting that the burden of esophageal and gastric cancers varies considerably across regions. EC is highly prevalent in economically underdeveloped areas of Asia, Africa, and South America, where dietary habits are often poor. Meanwhile, SC incidence is particularly high in East Asia, Eastern Europe, and South America, regions characterized by lower economic development, unbalanced diets, and high rates of Helicobacter pylori infection (11). Therefore, a combined analysis facilitates a more comprehensive evaluation of their overall burden and its relationship with socioeconomic development.The GBD study is a comprehensive and systematic analysis of global health trends, offering critical insights into the incidence, prevalence, and mortality rates of various diseases (12,13).Previous studies have analyzed the disease burden and future trends of SC and EC in China based on GBD 2019 (14), but there are limitations such as insufficient data timeliness, limited to specific regions, lack of discussion on the impact of socio-economic development level, and no analysis of age-period-cohort factors and the impact of aging, epidemiological changes and population growth. Although numerous GBD-based studies on individual cancers exist (15)(16)(17)(18)(19), this is the first systematic comparative analysis of EC and SC, which are highly related in public health strategies, using GBD 2021 data. The study not only delineates the burden of each cancer but also emphasizes the similarities and differences in their spatial distribution of co-occurrence patterns, gender disparities, age distribution, and temporal trends. Furthermore, this research projects the disease burden of cancers over the next decade, which is critical for evaluating the impact of public health interventions and guiding strategic directions for future cancer control (20,21). The GBD 2021 is the most extensive and comprehensive epidemiological assessment of global disease burdens and trends to date. Disease and study population data were retrieved from the Global Burden of Disease 2021 database (https://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-2021). Esophageal cancer and Stomach cancer are defined using 150 and 151 in the International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition (ICD-9) code, and C15 and C16 in the tenth edition (ICD-10) revision code (2). To facilitate meaningful comparisons across different populations, age standardization was performed using the world standard population developed by Segi and modified by Doll et al (22,23). All estimates are presented as age-standardized rates (ASR). The SDI, which ranges from 0 to 1, was incorporated to examine the relationship between trends in esophageal and gastric cancers and socioeconomic development. Countries were also grouped into five SDI-based quintiles (following the classification scheme established by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation). The SDI serves as a composite measure of national development, integrating total fertility rate, per capita income, and average educational attainment.In this study, we obtained and analyzed GBD 2021 data on gastric and esophageal cancers incidence, mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) by sex (male and female), age (20 age groups from <5 years to >95 years, at 5-year intervals), SDI quintiles, 204 countries and territories To investigate the co-occurrence patterns of EC and SC, as well as their spatial variations across different regions, incidence, mortality, and DALYs for both cancers in 2021 were classified into four tiers according to quartile ranges: low (<25 percentile), lower-middle (25-50 percentiles), upper-middle (50-75 percentiles), and high (>75 percentile). Countries or territories where both cancers exhibited the same incidence level were categorized as consistent units; collectively, these constituted the consistent region. Those with a higher incidence level of EC relative to SC were identified as esophageal cancer-dominant units, forming the esophageal cancer-dominant region.Correspondingly, areas where stomach cancer incidence surpassed that of esophageal cancer were classified as stomach cancer-dominant units, aggregating into the stomach cancer-dominant region.Thus, the global study area was segmented into three distinct regions, each reflecting a distinct pattern of co-occurrence between EC and SC. Furthermore, Spearman rank correlation analysis was employed to quantify the bivariate association patterns. ASR were integrated and processed by "time-region type-metric type" with handling of missing values. The ranks of the two cancer burden metrics were then transformed, and stratum-specific ρ values were calculated for each region type between 1990 and 2021. A significance level of α = 0.05 was set, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. This analysis helped characterize the temporal evolution of co-occurrence patterns and supported regional clustering analysis. All analyses were conducted using R version 4.3.3. To account for potential age structure differences, ASR with corresponding 95% uncertainty intervals (UI) and the average annual percent change (AAPC) were employed to assess the burden of cancer by quantifying incidence, mortality and DALYs trends. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for AAPC were computed on the basis of the standard errors of the regression slopes under the assumption of normally distributed residuals. These intervals reflect the degree of statistical uncertainty around the estimated rate of change in disease burden. If the CI of an AAPC estimate excludes zero, the trend is considered statistically significant. Conversely, intervals overlapping zero indicate a stable trend with no significant change. A α i w i i=1 A w i ×100.00(αi: age-specific ratio for age group i; w: population count for corresponding age group i in the standard population; A: total number of age groups).The UI refers to the range of uncertainty in prediction results caused by various uncertain factors during the forecasting process. This uncertainty interval helps us better understand the possible range of predicted outcomes and supports more informed decision-making. In GBD 2021, the UI is calculated through 1,000 iterations of Monte Carlo simulations, reflecting the combined effects of data input, model parameters, and sampling variation. Given the inherent statistical modeling and computational uncertainties in GBD studies, all estimates reported in this study are presented as the median value along with the 95% UI. This study employed Joinpoint regression analysis (24). This approach calculates two key metrics: (1) the average annual percentage change (AAPC), which reflects the overall mean trend across the entire study period, (2) the annual percentage change (APC), describing trends within individual segments. In this study, we initially employed a logarithmic linear model for segmented regression, applied the grid search method to identify all potential joinpoints, calculated the mean squared error (MSE) for each scenario, and selected the grid point with the smallest MSE as the joinpoint. Subsequently, the Monte Carlo permutation test was used to identify turning points in trends, with the maximum number of potential joinpoints set to five. Ultimately, we identified the key years marking turning points in the temporal trends of incidence and mortality rates for EC and SC globally from 1990 to 2021. An age-period-cohort (APC) model was used to systematically analyze the various factors contributing to changes in disease burden, including age effects, period effects, and birth cohort effects. Age effects reflect the natural variation in disease risk over the life course; period effects capture the short-term impact of external factors (such as medical advancements or policy interventions) on disease burden; and birth cohort effects reveal long-term disease burden differences due to exposure to specific risk factors within different cohorts. The model was implemented in R (version 4.3.3), using orthogonal decomposition to separate linear and non-linear components, with parameter estimation performed using weighted least squares (WLS).The model fit was assessed using the Wald χ² test (25). To quantify the contributions of population aging, population growth, and epidemiological changes to esophageal and gastric cancers burden, a demographic decomposition method was employed. Specifically, the changes in disease burden were decomposed into three main factors: changes in age structure, population size, and epidemiological changes. The relative contributions of these factors to the overall disease burden change were then analyzed to identify the primary drivers of the disease burden shift (26, 27). To predict the trend of esophageal and gastric cancers burden from 2022 to 2031, this study employed the Bayesian age-period-cohort (BAPC) model. This model uses a second-order random walk prior to smooth age, period, and cohort effects, effectively avoiding overfitting. Using the Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation (INLA) method, the model efficiently computed the marginal posterior distribution, circumventing the computational bottleneck associated with traditional Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. To ensure the reliability of the predictions, cross-validation and other methods were used to assess the robustness of the model (7). Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between SDI and ASR. To control for potential false-positive results due to multiple comparisons, the Benjamini-Hochberg method was applied to adjust the false discovery rate (FDR < 0.05). Additionally, locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) was used to fit non-linear trends and further reveal the complex relationships between SDI and disease burden. All data analyses were performed in Software R (version 4.3.3) and R studio, and the BAPC predictive model used the "nordpred (version 1.1)", "BAPC (version 0.0.36)" and "INLA (version 22.05.07)" packages. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. This study encompassed data on the incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of EC and SC across 204 countries and territories worldwide. As of 2021, the global age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR), age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR), and age-standardized DALYs rate (ASDR) of SC remained significantly higher than those of EC (Table 1). At the quartile level, the spatial distributions of two cancers showed substantial overlap (Figure 1B). Countries with three ASR classified as "consistent" accounted for 28.92%, 30.39%, and 27.45% of the global total respectively (Figure 1A, Supplementary Table 456). The Eastern and Northern Hemispheres emerged as the regions with the highest concentration of this "consistent" pattern, particularly in Asian nations such as Afghanistan, China, North Korea, and Mongolia, which represent core areas of the highest disease burden globally (Supplementary Figure 1-2, Supplementary Table 23). Notably, South Korea was identified as a region with the higher morbidity and mortality under the co-occurrence pattern (Supplementary Figure 12), yet it demonstrated a remarkably significant decline in disease burden (DALYs: AAPC for EC: -3.502; SC: -5.059). In contrast, the Western and Southern Hemispheres were predominantly characterized by low-burden profiles or patterns dominated by one cancer type. However, several countries, primarily located in North Africa (such as Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia) and the Middle East (including Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, and Saudi Arabia), also exhibited the "consistent" pattern. Benefiting from relatively higher income levels, often associated with oil resources, along with continuously developing healthcare systems, these nations maintained their ASR at comparatively low levels (Figure 1B, Supplementary Table 456).Spanning both hemispheres, Brazil stood out as the most prominent representative of the "consistent" pattern, accompanied by a considerable disease burden (Supplementary Figure 12).Regions with a high incidence of Based on the bivariate temporal and regional correlation patterns of disease burden (Figure 1C), the blue regions indicate a strong positive correlation between the two diseases, which facilitates the visualization and analysis of comorbidity-related burden. Among these areas, countries with the strongest correlated trends in incidence, including Japan, China, Mongolia, and Kazakhstan, showed a gradual decline in incidence over time. Similarly, the nations with the highest correlation in mortality and DALYs, namely China, Mongolia, and Kazakhstan, also exhibited a decreasing trend in these measures throughout the study period. Compared to 1990 (Table for esophageal and gastric cancer, respectively. Although ASR for both cancers showed a declining trend, with a more pronounced decrease observed for SC, the disease burden of SC remained higher than that of EC across all five SDI regions (Table 1). As Sex and age-stratified data revealed that the ASR and case numbers of both cancers increased with age before subsequently declining, with males consistently exhibiting higher rates than females (Figure 2). After adjusting for period and birth cohort effects, age-effect analysis reaffirmed this declining trend (Supplementary Fig. 34: a, d, g). Birth cohort analysis indicated that later birth cohorts were associated with lower ASR levels, suggesting a reduction in cumulative risk among more recently born populations (Supplementary Fig. 3-4: c, f, i).Period-effect analysis demonstrated a consistent downward trend in ASR across all time points (Supplementary Fig. 34: b, e, h), a finding further confirmed by Joinpoint regression.Between 1990 and 2021, significant declines in ASR were observed globally and across all five SDI regions. Notably, APC in global ASR for both cancers reached its lowest values during the period 2004-2007, indicating the most pronounced rate of decline (Figure 3). A general downward trend in ASR was observed with increasing SDI, although considerable regional disparities remain. For example, the burden of both cancers was significantly more severe in low SDI regions, particularly in Africa. As SDI levels rose, ASR gradually decreased across the other four continents; however, occasional increases were still observed in certain countries within these regions (Figure 4). As mentioned previously, each of these continents contains recognized high-risk countries for the respective cancers, such as China, Greenland, Brazil, Nauru, and Bolivia, which provides a plausible explanation for this phenomenon. It is evident that in most regions, population growth and aging have contributed to an increased disease burden of both cancers, while epidemiological changes have reduced the burden.Notably, aging and population growth were the most significant drivers of increased burden (Figure 5). It is important to emphasize that, at the global level, although the data point for SC shows a leftward shift in DALYs counts, this only indicates a reduction in DALYs counts between 1990 and 2021. Thus, the trend reflected by this shift remains consistent with our earlier data (Table 1), and the overall burden of SC continues to exceed that of EC. By 2031, the ASR for both EC and SC are projected to decline significantly (Figure 6). Globally, there will be an estimated 78). These findings indicate that the burden of SC will continue to substantially exceed that of EC in the foreseeable future. Previous studies have indicated that these two cancers share similar epidemiological features (28,29). Our results demonstrate that the Eastern and Northern Hemispheres represent the regions with the highest concentration of co-occurrence patterns, while the Western and Southern Hemispheres are predominantly characterized by low-burden profiles or patterns dominated by one cancer type. These findings are largely consistent with earlier epidemiological studies focusing on either esophageal or gastric cancer individually, though some discrepancies remain.Most countries are influenced by a combination of multiple factors, and the specific composition and temporal variation of these factors significantly contribute to the global disparities and heterogeneity in the distribution and burden of both cancers. The intertwined effects of these risk factors underscore the importance of multifaceted intervention strategies.First, cultural habits and medical level. Mongolia's high co-occurrence burden is driven by a diet heavy in salty foods, frequent consumption of scalding-hot milk tea, limited intake of fresh fruits and vegetables, high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection, and widespread tobacco and alcohol use (30). In contrast, Kuwait, an affluent Gulf nation, exhibits the lowest co-occurrence burden, which can be attributed to its diverse and healthy diet, advanced healthcare system, and cultural norms influenced by Islam that prohibit alcohol consumption. Moreover, substantial disparities in the burden of the two cancers can exist within the same country. Malawi, one of Africa's major tobacco-producing countries, has widespread availability of unfiltered, self-rolled tobacco products. Dietary factors including consumption of high-temperature foods, mycotoxin-contaminated staples, smoked products, and selenium-deficient diets, along with frequent exposure to smoke from wood-burning stoves, contribute to its high incidence of EC (1).Although H. pylori infection rates are high across Africa (31), the associated cancer risk remains relatively low. This phenomenon, often termed the "African enigma," has been partly attributed to the predominant circulation of the hpAfrica2 strain, which confers lower carcinogenic potential (32,33). Thus, Malawi is characterized by a high burden of EC but a low burden of SC, a pattern which has been corroborated by data from the Malawi National Cancer Registry (34). Conversely, Guatemala exhibits a high burden of SC alongside a low burden of EC. Latin America as a whole is not a high-risk region for EC, which may be partly explained by shared dietary and environmental conditions that reduce esophageal cancer risk. However, factors such as H. pylori infection, environmental exposures, and genetic susceptibility contribute to elevated SC risk (35), a pattern supported by findings from an ecological study (36). Therefore, adopting healthy lifestyle practices, such as maintaining a balanced diet, ceasing tobacco use, limiting alcohol consumption, and engaging in regular physical activity, can effectively reduce the risk of both cancers.Second, disease screening and level of public participation. The rapid development of early diagnosis and treatment programs, particularly in the field of upper gastrointestinal cancers, has significantly improved the detection and management of early-stage gastric and esophageal cancers. For instance, national cancer screening programs in Japan and South Korea have achieved early gastric cancer detection rates of 70% and 50%, respectively (37,38). Although South Korea is affected by common risk factors and represents the higher level in terms of both incidence and mortality under the co-occurrence pattern, it has experienced a remarkable decline in disease burden. This can be largely attributed to the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) implemented since 1999, which has facilitated the identification of a substantial number of early-stage cases. Coupled with advanced medical technology and treatment expertise, this initiative has significantly reduced mortality rates (39). Similarly, Japan initiated nationwide screening two decades earlier than South Korea. However, the coverage of endoscopic screening in Japan has been considerably lower. This is partly because Japanese screening guidelines did not recommend endoscopic screening until 2014. By 2015, only 19% of municipalities in Japan employed endoscopic screening, whereas as early as 2011, already 72.55% of participants in South Korea had opted for this method (40,41). In addition, public participation in screening has been lower in Japan compared to South Korea (42), contributing to a higher burden of EC in Japan.Nevertheless, Japan has been proactive in combating Helicobacter pylori infection. In 2013, Japan became the first country to provide national health insurance coverage for the eradication therapy of H. pylori-associated gastritis (43). This policy is one of the key factors explaining why Japan maintains a lower burden of gastric cancer than South Korea, despite its delayed policy adoption and lower screening participation.Third, economic development level. Globally, our findings indicate that among double high and upper-middle countries, a considerable number of high-burden regions are located in low or lower-middle-income African nations (25 [46.30%] of 54). In contrast, among double low and lower-middle countries, a significant proportion of low-burden regions are situated in high-incomeEuropean and Middle Eastern countries (20 [36.36%] of 55). Furthermore, countries most affected by EC and SC exhibit distinct economic characteristics. Nations within EC-dominated or SC-dominated regions are predominantly low or lower-middle-income countries. This pattern of comorbidity across different economic strata underscores that socioeconomic development is a fundamental and primary factor in disease prevention and control. In high-income countries such as the United States, Canada, Singapore, and several developed nations in Europe, enhanced screening efforts have contributed to an approximate 5% improvement in the five-year survival rate for SC (44). Compared to high-incidence regions such as East Asia and high-income Asia-Pacific, regions like Australia and high-income North America demonstrate notable advantages in public health awareness and education. Increased public knowledge regarding the association between Hp infection and SC has facilitated the adoption of preventive measures, effectively reducing SC incidence. Studies indicate that the Hp infection rate in the United States is approximately 36%, significantly lower than the global average of 50% (45,46). Therefore, strengthening risk factor control and expanding screening coverage are essential strategies for cancer prevention. Although our results suggest a relatively weak correlation between the burden of EC and SC and the SDI, a declining trend in ASIR, ASMR, and ASDR was observed with increasing SDI. Given the economic constraints in low-income regions that hinder large-scale screening, we recommend adopting a high-risk population screening model coupled with low-cost screening technologies. This approach would improve early diagnosis rates while reducing overall screening costs. Coupled with advancements in endoscopic technology (37,38), these developments improved both the detection and treatment outcomes of these cancers. Therefore, the observed decline during this period represents a landmark achievement resulting from the synergistic effects of prevention, diagnostic advances, and progress in therapeutic interventions.However, despite these encouraging trends, the absolute number of new cases and deaths continues to increase. This apparent contradiction is largely attributable to demographic changes, especially population growth and aging, which have contributed to a rise in the absolute disease burden (47). An exception was identified in the decomposition analysis: in Low SDI regions, population aging was associated with a reduction in disease burden. This may be explained by public health advances in certain countries within these regions (48), such as increased emphasis on infectious disease control and significant improvements in child survival rates. These developments have enabled more people to survive into older age while avoiding substantial years of life lost (YLL) due to premature death, ultimately leading to a reduction in overall disease burden. Nevertheless, public health progress presents a double-edged sword. Although advances in screening and treatment technologies have reduced the relative risk of cancer in many high-income countries, the growing elderly population and widespread adoption of diagnostic techniques have also led to the identification of more cases (49). Based on national-level data, this study proposes the global co-occurrence pattern of EC and SC for the first time. It classifies 204 countries and territories into three distinct types of co-occurrence regions, delineates the spatial distribution of both cancers within these categories, and interprets their epidemiological characteristics from global, regional, and national perspectives.The results demonstrate a significant declining trend in the burden of both cancers across these
Keywords: esophageal cancer, stomach cancer, Co-occurrence patterns, age-period-cohort model, BAPC model, prediction
Received: 20 Oct 2025; Accepted: 31 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xu, Gong, Han, Wang, Wang, Wang, Sui, Chen, Jia and Qin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: 
Guanyu  Chen, guanyu.chen@uni-marburg.de
Yongxu  Jia, jiayongxu111@126.com
Yanru  Qin, yanruqin@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
