ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oral Health
Sec. Oral Epidemiology
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1612982
Correlations between psychological anxiety symptoms and physical anxiety symptoms in dental anxiety -a cross-sectional study with 1327 patients
Provisionally accepted- 1Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences Section, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
- 2Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Dental anxiety is a prevalent phenomenon with the potential to impact both psychological well-being and oral health outcomes. It may lead to individuals avoiding treatment. This study aims to explore the relationship between psychological anxiety symptoms and physical anxiety symptoms in dental anxiety.Methods: Between 2019 and 2022, a cross-sectional study was conducted including 1327 patients from a variety of dental practices in Germany and students (age range: 18-85 years; mean: 39.65 years, 60.7% female). Participants completed validated questionnaires, including the Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS), the Scale Somato-visceral arousal of the Dental Fear Survey (DFS-SVA), the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18 GSI), and the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-5). Data was analysed using Mann-Whitney-U-tests, Spearman correlations, Kruskal-Wallis-tests and linear regression models. The significance level was set at p = 0.05.The mean value for dental anxiety (DAS) was 9.81 (SD = 4.07) and for physical anxiety symptoms (DFS-SVA) 10.51 (SD = 4.70). Of the participants, 808 (60.9 %) reported no dental anxiety, 368 (27.7 %) were somewhat anxious and 151 (11.4 %) reported severe dental anxiety. A strong correlation was observed between DAS and DFS (r = 0.544), while moderate correlations were found between DAS and BSI-18 (r = 0.300) and between DAS and OHIP-5 (r = 0.371). The application of regression analysis indicated that DFS-SVA was the strongest predictor of DAS scores (β = 0.434, p < 0.001), followed by BSI-18 GSI (β = 0.285, p < 0.001) and age (β = 0.174, p < 0.001). Gender was not found to have a significant influence on results. A significant disparity was observed in the results between male and female scores and on the DAS, DFS-SVA, and BSI-18 GSI compared to men.The study corroborates substantial correlation between psychological dental anxiety and physical anxiety symptoms. These findings underscore the necessity for early detection and targeted interventions within dental practices with the aim of enhancing both oral health and overall quality of life. It is recommended that future research endeavours focus on the investigation of causal relationships and the identification of effective treatment strategies to further enhance patient care.
Keywords: Dental Anxiety, Dental anxiety scale, dental fear survey, Oral Health, Anxiety symptoms, Cross-sectional study, Germany
Received: 16 Apr 2025; Accepted: 25 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Magerfleisch, Cunoti, Qorri, Weil, Tröger, Häring, Irmscher, Petrowski and Berth. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Hendrik Berth, Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences Section, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.