Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oral Health

Sec. Preventive Dentistry

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1669481

Caries status among Norway's children born with cleft lip and palate at age 6: A nationwide study

Provisionally accepted
Osman  Elrayah Mustafa OsmanOsman Elrayah Mustafa Osman1*Mohammed  A. YassinMohammed A. Yassin1Ragnar  BjeringRagnar Bjering2Paul  Kaare SaelePaul Kaare Saele1,3Ingrid  Miranda Thalén KorsnesIngrid Miranda Thalén Korsnes1Mari  Othilie Bakkemyr HagbøMari Othilie Bakkemyr Hagbø1Åse  SivetsenÅse Sivetsen4Stein  Atle LieStein Atle Lie1,5*
  • 1Center for Translational Oral Research, Department of Clinical Dentistry, Medical Faculty, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • 2Department of plastic surgery, Section for cleft lip and palate, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • 3Oral Health Centre of Expertise/Western Norway, Bergen, Norway
  • 4Department of Plastic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
  • 5The Norwegian National Network for Arthroplasty and Hip Fractures, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Orofacial cleft (OFC) is the most common congenital malformation affecting the craniofacial area. A major challenge in managing children with OFC is their increased susceptibility to dental caries. This study aims to explore the association between dental caries and various potential variables, including orofacial cleft (OFC) types, sex and the presence of additional congenital deformities. Methods: This study includes six-year-old children with orofacial cleft registered in the Norwegian registry of cleft lip and palate. Children were classified into two main groups: cleft lip and/or palate (CL±P) - including cleft lip only (CLO) and cleft lip and palate (CLP); and cleft palate only (CPO). Association between dental caries and OFC types, sex as well as additional congenital deformities was done using chi-square tests and logistic regression, reporting p-value and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article Results: Among 551 children with OFC (343 boys and 208 girls), 37% had CLP, 36% had CPO and 27% had CLO. Dental caries experience was found among 99 (18%) children (66 males and 33 females): 39 had CPO, 37 had CLP and 23 had CLO. No association between dental caries and OFC type was found (p=0.627). However, a significant association was found between dental caries and presence of additional congenital deformities (OR=2.10, 95% CI: 1.30–3.39, p=0.002). Conclusion: Boys are more common than girls among children with OFC. Children with OFC and additional congenital deformities are more susceptible to caries, indicating the need for more targeted and individualized preventive oral health strategies.

Keywords: Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, Dental Caries, congenital deformities, Norway

Received: 19 Jul 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Osman, Yassin, Bjering, Saele, Korsnes, Hagbø, Sivetsen and Lie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Osman Elrayah Mustafa Osman, Center for Translational Oral Research, Department of Clinical Dentistry, Medical Faculty, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Stein Atle Lie, Center for Translational Oral Research, Department of Clinical Dentistry, Medical Faculty, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.