Abstract
Eslicarbazepine acetate, a third-generation antiepileptic drug (AED), has shown improved clinical response and safety in comparison to older generation AEDs for patients with partial-onset seizures. It is currently not known whether eslicarbazepine acetate is safe to use in patients with the acute hepatic porphyrias (AHPs) since a few first-generation AEDs, such as phenobarbital and carbamazepine, are known porphyrogenic agents. In this study, we used a recently published in vitro fluorescence-based screening assay to screen for porphyrogenicity in various agents. The assay confirmed that among the tested compounds used, allyl isopropyl acetamide, carbamazepine, eslicarbazepine acetate, and phenobarbital were porphyrogenic. Thus, eslicarbazepine acetate should be avoided if possible in patients with the AHPs, but if initiated, patients should be closely monitored and the drug should be discontinued if a porphyric exacerbation occurs.
Introduction
Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological conditions in the world, and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have improved the quality of life of millions of epileptic patients (). As for many drug classes, newer AEDs have been developed to improve clinical response and safety while decreasing adverse effects and drug-drug interactions. Eslicarbazepine acetate, a third-generation AED with a similar structure to the first-generation AED, carbamazepine, has shown promising results with a safer side-effect profile in treating partial-onset seizures (). Carbamazepine, for example, is a potent inducer of multiple cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, such as CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5, which can subsequently increase the demand for heme biosynthesis (; ). This can be dangerous for patients with the acute hepatic porphyrias (AHPs), which are diseases where one of the enzymes in the heme biosynthesis pathway is deficient, and in which increased heme demand in hepatocytes leads to upregulation of hepatic delta-aminolevulinic (ALA) synthase-1, the first and normally rate-controlling step of this pathway. This can lead to the biochemical hallmark and sine qua non of acute porphyric attacks, namely, markedly elevated levels of ALA and porphobilinogen (PBG). Eslicarbazepine acetate, although it belongs to the same dibenzazepine carboxamide family as carbamazepine, has been reported to be a weaker inducer of CYP3A4, to have a lesser inhibitory effect on CYP2C19, and overall, fewer enzymatic interactions than carbamazepine (). Thus, it is thought that eslicarbazepine acetate may prove safer to use in patients with the AHPs; () however, it is currently not known whether it is porphyrogenic or not. In this study, we assessed the porphyrogenicity of eslicarbazepine acetate and a few other drugs with a recently published in vitro fluorescence-based screening assay in Leghorn Male Hepatoma (LMH) cells, which is a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line derived from male leghorn chickens treated with diethylnitrosamine (; ).
Methods
The methods for the fluorescence-based screening assay and the cytotoxicity assay are described in . The LMH cells were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, United States) and maintained in Waymouth medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) supplemented with penicillin-streptomycin and fetal bovine serum. LMH cells were seeded (1 × 104 cells per well) in a black, clear bottom 96-well plate coated with 0.1% gelatin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) and cultured overnight at 37°C. Compounds were added to the cells ranging from 0 to 1 mM in half-log increments in the presence and absence of 250 μM deferoxamine (DFO), an iron chelator that prevents ferrochelatase from converting protoporphyrin to heme. The addition of DFO allows greater accumulation of the fluorescent intermediate, protoporphyrin, which improves the sensitivity of the assay and helps mimic the effects of the AHPs. Each trial also had three replicates of 0.314 mM allyl isopropyl acetamide (AIA) and 0.314 mM aspirin as the positive and negative controls, respectively. After an 18–24 h incubation, plates were read at an excitation wavelength of 410 nm and an emission wavelength of 625 nm (Figure 1). In a parallel white, solid-bottom 96-well plate, the same conditions were applied to process cytotoxicity via the ATPLite cytotoxicity assay (Figure 2). Background signals were corrected by deducting all fluorescence measurements by the fluorescence produced by DMSO in the absence of DFO. Data and statistical analyses were completed with the software, GraphPad Prism 8.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
Results
In the presence of DFO, the AIA positive control produced fluorescence measurements between 1.6 and 2.1 times greater than the fluorescence measurements from the aspirin negative control in each experiment (Figure 1). The highest readings produced by aspirin, a known non-porphyrogenic drug (), were 0.62 times less than the readings produced by AIA. The highest fluorescence measurements produced by carbamazepine, eslicarbazepine acetate, and phenobarbital were 2.46, 2.08, and 2.35, respectively, times greater than the aspirin control. The fluorescence readings for AIA, aspirin, carbamazepine, and eslicarbazepine acetate begin to decrease at 0.314 and 1 mM likely due to cytotoxicity (Figure 2).
Discussion
AIA is a known potent porphyrogenic compound that can elicit porphyria even in animals without defects in the heme synthetic pathway, as well as exacerbate the AHPs, so over-production of protoporphyrin to a degree equal to or greater than that produced by 0.314 mM AIA indicates potent porphyrogenicity (; ; ; ). Aspirin was selected as the negative control because this drug has been used safely for decades in patients with the AHPs. Thus, protoporphyrin accumulation equal to or below that produced by 0.314 mM aspirin indicates non-porphyrogenicity and suggests drug safety in AHP. Carbamazepine and phenobarbital are already well-known to be porphyrogenic and risky for use in patients with the AHPs (; ). The results for these two drugs are as expected since they both produced readings greater than the fluorescence reading produced by the AIA control (Figure 1). Eslicarbazepine acetate behaved similarly to carbamazepine in this fluorescence-based screening assay with statistically significant results, which suggests that it too is porphyrogenic.
One recent case report described a patient with focal epilepsy and acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) whose seizures were improved with eslicarbazepine acetate without inducing clinical symptoms of an acute porphyric attack for up to a year. Her urinary PBG levels, however, remained more than 5-fold above the upper limit of the reference range, indicating continuing upregulation of hepatic ALA synthase-1 and risks of further attacks (). It is difficult to make any conclusions without a larger sample size, but our results along with this patient’s elevated urinary PBG levels suggest that eslicarbazepine acetate may be porphyrogenic with potency similar that those of phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine, at least in the LMH cell culture system recently described (). Although a causative clinical relationship cannot be established from the in vitro findings from this cell culture model to human pathophysiology, the results shown here and previously () indicate the need for caution and close observation if eslicarbazepine acetate is used in patients with the AHPs. As was done by Dr. Herrera-Fortin and his colleagues, epileptic patients with the AHPs should first be given AEDs that are known to be safer for use in AHPs, such as levetiracetam, topiramate, and benzodiazepines. If these fail to control the seizures, and eslicarbazepine acetate is initiated, patients should be observed closely during the first several months of such therapy, and, if tolerated without exacerbation of the acute porphyria, continue to be regularly monitored for potential porphyric exacerbations ().
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
HLB and CDM conceptualized and designed the study. CDM performed, analyzed and contributed to all the experiments. CDM and HLB wrote the manuscript.
Funding
Supported by a cooperative agreement with NIH/NIDDK U54 DK 083909 and by unrestricted grant funding from the American Porphyria Foundation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
BalwaniM.WangB.AndersonK. E.BloomerJ. R.BissellD. M.BonkovskyH. L.et al (2017). Acute hepatic porphyrias: Recommendations for evaluation and long-term management. Hepatology66 (4), 1314–1322. 10.1002/hep.29313
2
BonkovskyH. L. (1990). “Porphyrin and heme metabolism and the porphyrias,” in Hepatology: A textbook of liver disease. Editors ZakimD.BoyerT.. 2nd ed. (Philadelphia: Saunders), 378–424.
3
BonkowskyH. L.CollinsA.DohertyJ. M.TschudyD. P. (1973). The glucose effect in rat liver: studies of delta-aminolevulinate synthase and tyrosine aminotransferase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta320 (3), 561–575. 10.1016/0304-4165(73)90136-0
4
CorreiaM. A.SinclairP. R.De MatteisF. (2011). Cytochrome P450 regulation: the interplay between its heme and apoprotein moieties in synthesis, assembly, repair, and disposal. Drug Metab. Rev.43 (1), 1–26. 10.3109/03602532.2010.515222
5
GalianaG. L.GauthierA. C.MattsonR. H. (2017). Eslicarbazepine acetate: A new improvement on a classic drug family for the treatment of partial-onset seizures. Drugs R. D.17 (3), 329–339. 10.1007/s40268-017-0197-5
6
HahnM.GildemeisterO. S.KraussG. L.PepeJ. A.LambrechtR. W.DonohueS.et al (1997). Effects of new anticonvulsant medications on porphyrin synthesis in cultured liver cells: Potential implications for patients with acute porphyria. Neurology49 (1), 97–106. 10.1212/wnl.49.1.97
7
HanayaR.AritaK. (2016). The new antiepileptic drugs: Their Neuropharmacology and clinical indications. Neurol. Med. Chir.56 (5), 205–220. 10.2176/nmc.ra.2015-0344
8
Herrera-FortinT.PanaR.WesolowskaE.Bourré-TessierJ.NguyenD. K. (2020). Eslicarbazepine for focal epilepsy and acute intermittent porphyria. Epileptic Disord.22 (3), 349–352. 10.1684/epd.2020.1171
9
KawaguchiT.NomuraK.HirayamaY.KitagawaT. (1987). Establishment and characterization of a chicken hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, LMH. Cancer Res.47 (16), 4460–4464.
10
KolluriS.ElbirtK. K.BonkovskyH. L. (1999). Heme biosynthesis in a chicken hepatoma cell line (LMH): comparison with primary chick embryo liver cells (CELC). Biochim. Biophys. Acta1472 (3), 658–667. 10.1016/s0304-4165(99)00159-2
11
LynchT.PriceA. (2007). The effect of cytochrome P450 metabolism on drug response, interactions, and adverse effects. Am. Fam. Physician76 (3), 391–396.
12
MaC. D.Van HornC. G.WanM.BishopC.BonkovskyH. L. (2022). Assessment of porphyrogenicity of drugs and chemicals in selected hepatic cell culture models through a fluorescence-based screening assay. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect.10 (3), e00951. 10.1002/prp2.951
13
NAPOS (2007). The drug database for acute porphyria. Available at: http://www.drugs-porphyria.org/index.php. Accessed May 5, 2022.
14
ThunellS.PompE.BrunA. (2007). Guide to drug porphyrogenicity prediction and drug prescription in the acute porphyrias. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.64 (5), 668–679. 10.1111/j.0306-5251.2007.02955.x
15
TschudyD. P.BonkovskyH. L. (1972). Experimental porphyria. Fed. Proc.31, 147–159.
Summary
Keywords
porphyrogenicity, acute hepatic porphyria, porphyric attack, eslicarbazepine acetate, AEDs
Citation
Ma CD and Bonkovsky HL (2022) Eslicarbazepine acetate is porphyrogenic and should be used with caution in patients with the acute hepatic porphyrias. Front. Pharmacol. 13:953961. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.953961
Received
28 May 2022
Accepted
02 August 2022
Published
06 September 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Rita Citraro, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Italy
Reviewed by
Bruce Mao Zheng Wang, University of California, San Francisco, United States
Josef Finsterer, K. A. Rasmussen, Norway
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Ma and Bonkovsky.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Herbert L. Bonkovsky, hbonkovs@wakehealth.edu
This article was submitted to Neuropharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.