ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Experimental Pharmacology and Drug Discovery
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1532665
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancements in Pharmacological Treatments for Bone Metabolic DiseasesView all articles
Integrating Network Pharmacology, IPA, and Molecular Docking to Reveal the Anti-Osteoporosis Effects of EA and EB via the FAK Pathway Abstract:
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- 2Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
- 3Shanghai University, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
- 4Departments of Genetics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
- 5Shanghai baoshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Osteoporosis, a prevalent condition in the elderly and postmenopausal women, elevates fracture risk and diminishes quality of life. Epimedium, a traditional Chinese herb, is widely used for osteoporosis treatment but contains complex compounds requiring isolation of active monomers to enhance efficacy and safety. Using network pharmacology and literature review, we identified five novel anti-osteoporotic monomers: Epimedin A (EA), Epimedin B (EB), Epimedoside A (EPA), 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde (PHBA), and Baohuoside VI. In vitro assays revealed that EA, EB, and EPA dose-dependently inhibited osteoclast differentiation in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) via reduced TRAP-positive cells and osteoclast-related gene expression. Conversely, EA and EB promoted osteoblast differentiation in cranial preosteoblasts, evidenced by elevated ALP activity, mineralization, and osteogenic gene markers.In ovariectomized (OVX) mice, EA and EB (5–20 mg/kg) significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone number versus OVX controls (P < 0.05), with no pharmacological toxicity observed in organ histopathology. Mechanistically, NF-κB and MAPK (ERK/JNK) pathways were unaffected, as shown by luciferase reporter assays and Western blotting. Target prediction via PharmMapper, SwissTargetPrediction, and SuperPred identified focal adhesion kinase (FAK) as a key mediator. Molecular docking confirmed strong binding of EA and EB to FAK1 (ΔG: -13.012 and -14.0164 kJ/mol) and FAK2 (ΔG: -5.815 and -6.4852 kJ/mol).qPCR validated that EA and EB suppressed FAK1 and FAK2 expression in osteoclasts but upregulated them in osteoblasts at high doses. These findings suggest that EA and EB mitigate osteoporosis by modulating FAK signaling to inhibit bone resorption and enhance formation. This study highlights FAK as a therapeutic target and provides novel insights into Epimedium-derived monomers for precision osteoporosis treatment. Further research is warranted to delineate FAK-dependent mechanisms in vivo.
Keywords: Osteoporosis, Anti-osteoporosis drugs, Epimedium, Network Pharmacology, molecular docking, IPA
Received: 14 Dec 2024; Accepted: 16 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wei, You, Li, Wu, Tang, Wan, Dong, Huang, Gao, Cai, Chen and Dong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xiongsheng Chen, Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, 201620, China
Xin Dong, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, Shanghai Municipality, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.