ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Experimental Pharmacology and Drug Discovery
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1537053
Antimalarial Compounds Exhibit Variant-and Cell-Type-Specific Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 Isolated in Panama
Provisionally accepted- 1Gorgas Memorial Institute of Health Studies, Panama City, Panama
- 2Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología, Panama City, Panama
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
1) Background: This study evaluates the antiviral activity of antimalarial compounds against SARS-CoV-2 variants isolated in Panama (2020Panama ( -2022)). ( 2) Methods: For this purpose, we conducted a series of in vitro assays in two host mammalian cell systems, Vero-E6 and Calu-3 cells, to assess the antiviral activity of twenty-six antimalarials and antiviral compounds against the Delta and A2.5 variants; (3) Results: In the initial screening using Vero-E6 cells, with an antiviral inhibition threshold of ≥20% and cell viability of ≥80%, chloroquine (CQ) significantly inhibited the Delta variant. Meanwhile, amodiaquine (AQ), artemisone (ASO), and ivermectin (IVM) showed activity against the A2.5 variant. In Calu-3 cells, a wider variety of compounds, including chloroquine (CQ), amodiaquine (AQ), artesunate (AS), lumefantrine (LUM), and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), were found to be effective against the Delta variant. However, only amodiaquine (AQ) and arteether (AE) showed activity against the A2.5 variant, indicating that the response varies depending on the variant and the type of cells involved. Secondary screenings further demonstrated CQ's high inhibitory activity, with an IC50 of 6.3 μM and a selectivity index of 8, followed by HCQ, which was 1.8 times more potent against A2.5 than Delta. Time-of-addition experiments suggested that CQ and primaquine (PQ) were ineffective during the viral adsorption phase but showed a dose-dependent antiviral effect against the A2.5 variant in the early replication phase, whereas the Delta variant showed resistance; (4) Conclusion: This study underscores the critical role of selecting appropriate cell models for SARS-CoV-2 research, as drug efficacy varies between viral variants and host cell types.
Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, variants, in vitro, Antimalarials, antiviral, Vero-E6, Calu-3, Panama
Received: 29 Nov 2024; Accepted: 29 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Quijada, Castillo, Diaz, Pittí, Franco, De La Guardia, Campos, Cornejo, Núñez, Mendoza, Lopez-Verges, Magallon-Tejada and Obaldia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Nicanor Obaldia, Gorgas Memorial Institute of Health Studies, Panama City, Panama
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.