ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Pharmacology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1545533
This article is part of the Research TopicInfections in the Intensive Care Unit - Volume IIIView all 14 articles
Prophylactic Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and All-Cause Mortality in Adult Sepsis Patients: A Retrospective Analysis Based on the MIMIC-IV Database
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Intensive Care Unit, Inner Mongolia Medical University Affiliated Hospital, Hohhot 010050, China, Hohhot, China
- 2Department of Emergency, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Sepsis poses a significant threat to human health, and extensive research has examined the relationship between proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and adverse outcomes in patients with sepsis. However, a consensus on this issue remains elusive. Therefore, this study aims to develop a prognostic model to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic PPI administration in patients with sepsis.: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the open-access Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database. Patients diagnosed with sepsis according to the Sepsis-3.0 criteria were selected for inclusion. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality occurring between 28 and 90 days following prophylactic PPI use. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, duration of hospital and ICU stays, and the incidence of adverse events. Stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed, and multivariate Cox regression models were developed and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier curves were utilized to compare patient survival at 28 and 90 days. Results: This study included 18,198 sepsis patients. The results demonstrated that prophylactic PPI use was significantly associated with increased 90-day all-cause mortality following ICU admission (P < 0.001). Prediction models incorporating 28-day (Training AUC 0.74;95%CI 0.73-0.75) and 90-day (Training AUC 0.73; 95%CI 0.72-0.74) outcomes exhibited superior accuracy compared to conventional CCI and SOFA scores. Notably, prophylactic PPI use reduces ICU stay by approximately 1 day in sepsis patients but does not reduce overall hospitalization.Additionally, PPI administration was linked to adverse events including hypoalbuminemia and opportunistic infections.Conclusions: Prophylactic PPI use failed to improve 28-day or 90-day survival rates in adult sepsis patients. Although PPI use was associated with reduced ICU length of stay, it did not shorten total hospital stay duration. Additionally, PPI administration was linked to clinically significant adverse reactions.
Keywords: Sepsis, Proton Pump Inhibitors, MIMIC-IV database, Risk factors, predictive model, prognosis
Received: 15 Dec 2024; Accepted: 05 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ma, Zhang, Wang, Zhang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Lipeng Zhang, Department of Intensive Care Unit, Inner Mongolia Medical University Affiliated Hospital, Hohhot 010050, China, Hohhot, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.