Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive decline. 7-α-O-Methylmorroniside (MorA), an iridoid glycoside extracted from Cornus officinalis Sieb. et Zucc., has been shown to have neuroprotective effects, but the mechanism of its anti-AD effect has not been clarified. In the present study, we investigated the mechanism by which MorA ameliorated brain injury in 5×FAD mice by using gut microbiota (GM) combined with in vitro and in vivo pharmacological experiments. Behavioral tests revealed that MorA could enhance learning and memory ability and improve cognitive impairment. The results of pathology, flow cytometry and biochemical indexes showed that MorA could reduce the levels of neuronal apoptosis, oxidative stress, Aβ1-40, Aβ1-42, p-Tau, and inflammatory factors in the mouse brain tissues, and improve brain damage. 16S rDNA sequencing showed that MorA increased the abundance of the beneficial bacterium Lactobacillus and decreased the abundance of the inflammation-associated Muribaculaceae and Prevotellaceae, and that these differential bacteria were closely associated with brain biochemical indicators. In addition, pathway enrichment analysis, Western blot and molecular docking results showed that the ameliorative effect of MorA on brain injury in 5×FAD mice was closely related to NMDAR2B. Next, an inhibitor of NMDAR2B was added to Aβ25-35-induced N9 and PC12 cells to further investigate whether the effect of MorA on AD was mediated through NMDAR2B. In conclusion, MorA ameliorated brain injury in 5×FAD mice by restoring GM homeostasis and inhibiting NMDAR2B.
1 Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a degenerative disease of the central nervous system, characterized by progressive cognitive deficit and behavioral impairment, which commonly occurs in elderly individuals (Rabbito et al., 2020). Symptoms such as emotional apathy, cognitive impairment and language deficits are common in people with AD. The primary pathological features of AD are plaques formed by the deposition of amyloid-beta (Aβ) protein and neurofibrillary tangles composed of phosphorylated tau proteins (Breijyeh and Karaman, 2020). Aβ deposition also contributes to neuronal death and brain damage by accelerating apoptosis and promoting oxidative stress and inflammation, ultimately exacerbating AD. In addition, cholinergic nerve damage, excitatory neurotoxicity, and mitochondrial dysfunction are also closely related to the development of AD (Richter et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2025; Swerdlow et al., 2014). Therefore, specifying the potential pathogenesis of AD is essential for its treatment.
In recent years, there has been increasing evidence that gut microbiota (GM) disorders are associated with AD (Wang, 2023). The enormous and diverse GM in the human body plays a crucial role in maintaining various molecular and cellular processes (Carloni and Rescigno, 2023) and can interact with the brain through a variety of pathways and processes, such as the vagus nerve and the immune system, to maintain brain homeostasis (Bano et al., 2024). Studies have shown that loss of GM not only increases the permeability of the gut and blood-brain barrier and activates the immune system (Mahadev et al., 2023), but also induces the release of large amounts of amyloids, lipopolysaccharides, and neurotoxins, increases pro-inflammatory mediators, and ultimately leads to neurodegeneration, which contributes to the process of AD (Nafady et al., 2022). Thus, sequencing of GM can be used as a tool for exploring the pathogenesis and therapeutic drugs of AD, which can be helpful for AD drug discovery.
7-α-O-Methylmorroniside (MorA) is an iridoid glycoside obtained from Cornus officinalis Sieb. et Zucc (Yang et al., 2022). It was shown to have significant neuroprotective activity against glutamate-induced toxicity in HT22 hippocampal cells (Jeong et al., 2012). However, there is no evidence demonstrating that MorA is effective in transgenic AD mouse models. Five gene loci with familial mutations in AD are present in transgenic 5×FAD mice (Song et al., 2021), and the results of most experimental and research analyses can now confirm that the mutated genes induce amyloid plaque formation, neurodegeneration, and behavioral dysfunction that are similar to those of AD patients (Ge et al., 2021). As a result, 5×FAD mice are commonly utilized to study AD-related pathologies and therapeutic approaches. Memantine (Mem) is a drug approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of AD (Tang et al., 2023), which can exert anti AD effects by blocking N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR) and reducing calcium influx (Kabir et al., 2019). Therefore, we chose Mem as the positive control. In this study, we investigated the effect and mechanism of MorA on brain damage in 5×FAD mice using 16S rDNA sequencing and pharmacological experiments. This will provide an experimental basis for the medical value of MorA.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Medicine
MorA was isolated from C. officinalis Sieb. et Zucc, purity ≥ 98% (Yang et al., 2022). Aβ25-35 peptides were purchased from Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., dissolved in double-distilled water and aggregated by incubation at 37°C for 7 days. Memantine (CAS:41100-52-1, purity ≥ 98%) was purchased from Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
2.2 Animals
C57BL/6J mice (WT, 4–5 months old, n = 10) and 5×FAD mice (4–5 months, n = 40) were purchased from Shanghai Southern Model Biotechnology Co., Ltd. and kept in a clean-grade animal room at 18°C–24°C with a standard light/dark cycle. The mice had free access to water and food. Animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Ethics No. DWLL2018080003). After 1 week of acclimatization feeding, C57BL/6J mice were used as the control group (WT), while forty 5×FAD mice were randomly divided into four groups: model (M), memantine-treated (5 mg/kg, Mem), low-dose MorA-treated (15 mg/kg, MorA-L), and high-dose MorA-treated (30 mg/kg, MorA-H). Mem and MorA were then administered by gavage once a day for four consecutive weeks. The WT group and the M group were given the same amount of normal saline. Behavioral testing was performed 1 week before the animals were euthanized. The experimental procedure is shown in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1
2.3 Behavioral tests
2.3.1 Y-maze test
The Y-maze alternation test is frequently used to investigate short-term memory (Kraeuter et al., 2019). As we previously reported, the total number of times the mice entered each arm (N) was recorded, with the successive entry into the three different arms being recorded as an alternation (N1) (Cao et al., 2021). The percentage of alternation (%) = [N1/(N-2)] × 100%.
2.3.2 Novel object recognition test (NOR)
The NOR test assesses cognitive and memory abilities based on the innate preference of rodents for novelty (Da Cruz et al., 2020). The detection method was as previously described (Cao et al., 2021), we positioned two identical objects (A0 and A1) at the left and right ends of a square arena, respectively. The mouse was placed equidistant from both objects, and the time spent exploring the novel object was recorded during a 5-min session. After 24 h, A0 was replaced with a novel object B, and the exploration time toward object A1 (TA1) and novel object B (TB) was measured over another 5-min period. Then the preferential index = TB/(TA1+TB) and discrimination index = (TB-TA1)/(TA1+TB) were calculated (Zeng et al., 2022a).
2.3.3 Morris water maze (MWM)
The MWM test is the most commonly used experimental method to evaluate spatial learning and memory. It can effectively assess hippocampus-dependent learning and memory (Othman et al., 2022). A 120-cm-diameter pool filled with milky white water and a video tracking system were used to perform the MWM test. The platform was placed in one quadrant of the pool, approximately 1 cm from the water surface. The experiment lasted 7 days. On the first day of the experiment, the mice were allowed to explore freely for 5 min, after which they were placed on the platform for 1 min. From the 2nd day to the 6 day of the experiment, the mice were placed into the water facing the wall of the pool and allowed to explore for 60 s. If the mice found the platform within 60 s, they could rest for 1 min; if they failed to find the platform, they were guided to it and stayed there for 1 min. On the 7 day of the experiment, the platform was removed, and the mice were placed in the water at one of the same entry points. The time spent in the original platform quadrant and the number of times the mice crossed the platform within 60 s were recorded. Trajectory acquisition was performed using the Animal Behavior Trajectory Video Analysis System V3.0 (Labmaze, Beijing Zhongshi Dichuang Technology Development Co., Ltd., China).
2.4 Haematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining
After the behavioral experiments were finished, mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation following isoflurane anesthesia. The brains of mice were rapidly dissected on ice and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 24 h. Afterwards, they were embedded in paraffin and processed into 5 μm paraffin-embedded sections. Then, the sections were stained with HE. Images were captured using an OLYMPUS BX53F2 microscope.
2.5 Thioflavin S staining
Brain tissue sections were deparaffinized and washed with PBS, after which the processed sections were incubated with 0.5% thapsigargin S dissolved in 50% ethanol for 30 min. At the end of the incubation, the sections were differentiated twice with 80% ethanol and washed with distilled water. Finally, the stained sections were incubated in 5×PBS solution at 4°C for 1 h and blocked. Fluorescence images were scanned and obtained by Wuhan Servicebio Biotechnology Co., Ltd., screenshots were taken using CaseViewer software, and fluorescence intensity was quantified by ImageJ software.
2.6 Flow cytometry analysis of apoptosis, ROS and Ca2+ levels
After the mice were executed, the hippocampus was carefully isolated from the mouse brain and then gently crushed in 12 mL of sterile PBS. Then the samples were filtered through a 70 μm filter membrane and centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded to obtain the primary hippocampal cells of mice. Primary hippocampal cells were resuspended in 300 µL PBS, and the suspension was divided equally into three portions. Apoptosis, ROS and Ca2+ levels were detected using Annexin V/PI (BD Biosciences 556547, United States), DCFH-DA (CA1410; Solarbio, Beijing, China), and Fluo-4 AM (F8500, Solarbio, Beijing, China) kits, respectively, following the kit instructions. The level of apoptosis was measured and analyzed by flow cytometry (BD FACSAria III, United States), while ROS and Ca2+ were measured using Flowsight FlowSight® (Luminex, Austin, Texas, United States).
N9 and PC12 cells were treated with drugs for 24 h and then centrifuged to obtain single cells. The cells were stained using the Annexin V/PI kit, DCFH-DA, and Fluo-4 AM, respectively. Cells were then collected using FACS Aria III and apoptosis, ROS and Ca2+ levels were determined.
2.7 Biochemical indexes
Take about 80 mg of mouse brain tissue and prepare a brain tissue homogenate with a concentration of 100 mg/mL using physiological saline, and the supernatant was centrifuged to measure the levels of mouse beta amyloid beta 1–42 (Aβ1-42, E-EL-M3010), mouse beta amyloid beta 1–40 (Aβ1-40, E-EL-M3009), phosphorylated Tau protein (p-Tau, E-EL-M1289c), mousetumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α, E-EL-M0049c), mouse interleukin-6 (IL-6, MM-0163M1), mouse interleukin-1β (IL-1β, MM-0040M1), mouse glutathione (Glu, MM-44113M1), superoxide dismutase (SOD, A001-3-2, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px, A005-1-2, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China), and malondialdehyde (MDA, A003-1-2, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).
2.8 Gut microbiota (GM) analysis
Faecal samples were collected from the mice before dissection. The total DNA of the microbiome samples from the feces of 5×FAD mice was extracted by CTAB. Full-length 16S rDNA PCR was performed using primers: 27F: 5′-AGRGTTYGATYMTGGGCTCAG-3′ and 1492R: 5′-RGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′. Next, Hangzhou Lianchuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. carried out 16S rDNA sequencing using a PacBio Sequel II sequencer. Graphical visualization was performed using the Lianchuan Biotechnology Cloud Platform (Lyu et al., 2023).
2.9 Western blotting
Approximately 50 mg of mouse brain tissue was homogenized in lysis buffer, resulting in a final amount of 100 mg/mL. The supernatant was collected, the protein concentration was determined using a BCA Protein Extraction Kit (Solarbio, Life Science, Beijing, China), and the proteins were loaded into a gel using loading buffer. The sample size for each well is fixed at 30 μg and then the samples were separated by SDS‒PAGE, after which they were transferred to PVDF membranes. Next, 5% BSA was used for blocking. After blocking, primary antibodies N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor 2B (NMDAR2B, GW008516, 1:1,000) and β-Tubulin (I0094-I-AP, 1:1,000) were added and incubated overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies in the dark for 1 h. Imaging was performed using an Odyssey CLx infrared fluorescence scanning imaging system (Clx, Li-COR, United States) and analyzed using Image studio software.
2.10 Molecular docking
The PDB files of glutamate receptor protein NMDAR2B (PDB:7UJT) was downloaded from the Protein Data Bank database (https://www.rcsb.org/). The 2D structure of MorA was downloaded from the PubChem database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Molecular docking was performed using the SailVina platform, after which the molecular docking results were exported using OpenBabel software and PyMOL software, and then the binding sites were identified using the protein–ligand interaction profiler (PLIP) website (https://projects.biotec.tu-dresden.de/plip-web/plip/index).
2.11 Cell culture
N9 microglial cells (purchased from Beina Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, 31800-022, United States) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hangzhou Four Seasons, 11011-8611) in a 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator, while highly differentiated PC12 cells (PC12) (purchased from Procell Life Science and Technology Co. Ltd.) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified of Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, 12100-061, United States) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hangzhou Four Seasons, 11011-8611) in a 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator.
2.12 Cell viability assay
PC12 and N9 cells were inoculated into 96-well cell culture plates (CCP-96H, Wuhan Servicebio Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China) at 5 × 104 and 3 × 104 cells/well, respectively. Next, they were divided into the following groups: control group (CON); model group (M, Aβ25-35, 1 μM for PC12 cells, 0.1 μM for N9 cells); and MorA group (0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 μM). MTT solution (20 μL, 5 mg/mL) was added to each well after 24 h and then incubated at 37°C for 4 h. After discarding the medium, 150 µL DMSO was added, and the plate was shaken for 10 min. The OD value was then measured at a wavelength of 490 nm on an EPOCH microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, United States).
2.13 Effect of MorA on Aβ25-35-induced cell damage
N9 and PC12 cells were seeded in six-well plates at densities of 6 × 104 and 1 × 105 cells per well, respectively. They were divided into six groups: the normal group (CON), model group (M, Aβ25-35, 1 μM for PC12 cells, 0.1 μM for N9 cells), MorA group (0.2 μM for PC12 cells, 0.5 μM for N9 cells, Aβ25-35, 0.1 μM or 1 μM), and groups with NMDAR2B inhibitor (MK-801, 10 μM) added separately. MK-801 was administered 1 h before the start of drug treatment, and the cells were collected 24 h later. Apoptosis, ROS and Ca2+ levels were then determined using FACS Aria III (BD Biosciences, United States).
2.14 Statistical analysis
Experimental data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 26.0 software and Tukey test was used to compare the differences between groups. P values less than 0.05 was considered significant.
3 Results
3.1 MorA enhances learning memory and ameliorated cognitive deficits in 5×FAD mice
To assess the effect of MorA on the amelioration of learning memory and cognitive ability in 5×FAD mice, we performed behavioral tests. The Y-maze results showed that the spontaneous alternation rate was significantly lower in 5×FAD mice (P < 0.01), while the spontaneous alternation rate in the Mem, MorA-L, MorA-H groups were increased (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05, Figures 2A, B). The results of the NOR test showed that the Mem and MorA-L groups significantly increased the preference index and discrimination index of new object in 5×FAD mice compared with the M group (P < 0.05, Figures 2C–E). The MWM was used to further investigate the effect of MorA on learning memory, and the results showed that the escape latency of mice in all groups were greatly shortened from 2 to 6 days (Figures 2F, H), and mice in the Mem, MorA-L, and MorA-H groups stayed in the platform area for a longer period of time after the platform was removed (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05, Figures 2G, I). From these results, it can be observed that Mem, MorA-L and MorA-H improved learning memory ability and cognitive deficits in 5×FAD mice, in which the treatment effect of MorA-L is better than that of MorA-H. Therefore, only the results of MorA-L were shown in the subsequent experiments.
FIGURE 2
3.2 MorA attenuated pathological brain damage in 5×FAD mice
The H&E staining results showed that neurons in the cortical and hippocampal regions of mice in the M group exhibited deepened staining, cell atrophy, and a decrease in the number of normal cells, whereas neuronal cells in mice treated with Mem and MorA demonstrated normal morphology, neat arrangement, and typical neural texture (Figure 3A). Then, Aβ plaques in the brain tissue of mice were observed by thioflavine staining and it was found that the area of Aβ plaques in the brain tissue of mice in the M group was significantly increased, and there were different degrees of improvement after the administration of Mem and MorA interventions (P < 0.01, Figures 3B-D). In addition, detection of characteristic pathological indicators revealed that Mem and MorA significantly reduced the levels of Aβ1-40, Aβ1-42, and p-Tau in the brain tissues of 5×FAD mice (P < 0.01, Figures 3E–G), as well as the levels of inflammatory factors IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05, Figures 3H–J). These results suggested that MorA attenuated pathological damage in brain tissue of 5×FAD mice and that its effect is comparable to that of Mem.
FIGURE 3
3.3 MorA reduced apoptosis, oxidative stress and Ca2+ levels in the brain tissue of 5×FAD mice
We used flow cytometry to detect indicators of apoptosis and oxidative stress in mouse brain tissue to further explore the effects of MorA on brain injury in 5×FAD mice. The results indicated that the apoptosis rate and ROS generation rate were significantly increased in the brain tissue of mice in group M. These indicators decreased significantly after treatment with Mem and MorA (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05, Figures 4A–C). Although the level of Ca2+ in mouse brain tissue was improved, it did not show significant difference. Moreover, Mem and MorA significantly reduced MDA levels and increased the expression of T-SOD in brain tissues of 5×FAD mice (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05, Figures 4E, F), but had no significant effect on GSH-Px (Figure 4D). The results in this section suggested that MorA ameliorated brain injury by reducing apoptosis, oxidative stress and Ca2+ levels in the brain tissue of 5×FAD mice.
FIGURE 4
3.4 MorA restored gut microbial imbalance in 5×FAD mice
Alterations in the GM are closely related to the development of disease. Through 16S rDNA sequencing, it was possible to assess the composition of GM and explore changes in the GM of 5×FAD mice during MorA treatment. The top 20 most enriched genus-level groups in the GM are shown in Figure 5A. Lactobacillus abundance was increased, while Muribaculaceae, Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136, Ruminococcaceae, Prevotellaceae, and Streptococcus abundance were decreased after MorA treatment (Figure 5B). Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on UniFrac distances showed significant characteristic clustering of the microbiota in the WT, M, and MorA groups (Figure 5C). LEfSe analysis revealed significant differences in microbial taxa between the model and MorA groups when the LDA score exceeded 3. (Figure 5D).
FIGURE 5
3.5 Interaction of GM with brain biochemical indices
The correlation analysis of the top 20 genus-level microbe abundance in the GM with the brain biochemical indices (Figure 5E) showed that Lactobacillus was significantly negatively correlated with MDA, IL-6, IL-1β, p-Tau, and Aβ1-40 levels and Prevotellaceae was significantly negatively correlated with Aβ1-40, Aβ1-42, Glu, MDA, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β levels. Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 showed a positive correlation with MDA and IL-1β levels and Oscillospiraceae showed a positive correlation with IL-1β and p-Tau levels. Finally, Odoribacter was positively correlated with MDA, IL-6, TNF-α, and p-Tau levels, and Rikenella was positively correlated with TNF-α and p-Tau levels.
3.6 MorA regulated NMDAR2B in the brain of 5×FAD mice
PICRUSt functional predictions showed that the therapeutic effects of MorA on AD involve glutamatergic synapse, transcription machinery, glutathione metabolism, and so on (Figure 6A). Glutamate is a class of excitatory neurotransmitters in vivo, and its abnormalities can lead to neurotoxicity. Our examination of glutamate levels in mouse brain tissue revealed an abnormal increase in glutamate levels in brain tissue of 5×FAD mice (P < 0.05, Figure 6B), suggesting possible excitotoxicity. Glutamate-induced excitotoxicity is closely related to the glutamate receptor NMDAR2B. To further investigate whether MorA exerts therapeutic effects by affecting NMDAR2B, we modeled the binding mode of MorA and NMDAR2B by molecular docking and found that there are three hydrophobic interactions, three hydrogen bonds and two π-stacking interactions between MorA and NMDAR2B (Figure 6C). Furthermore, we found that NMDAR2B protein levels were also significantly increased in 5×FAD mice, and MorA inhibited NMDAR2B expression (P < 0.05, Figures 6D-E). The above results indicated that MorA regulated NMDAR2B in the brain of 5×FAD mice.
FIGURE 6
3.7 Inhibition of NMDAR2B reversed the ameliorative effect of MorA on Aβ25-35-induced N9 and PC12 cells damage
To further investigate whether MorA exerts its therapeutic effect through NMDAR2B, Aβ25-35 was used to induce cell injury in N9 and PC12 cells, and apoptosis, ROS and Ca2+ were measured. The MTT results showed that the cell viability of N9 and PC12 cells were significantly reduced after incubation with Aβ25-35 for 24 h. MorA maximized N9 cells viability at a concentration of 0.5 μM (P < 0.01, Figure 7A) and significantly increased PC12 cells viability at a concentration of 0.2 μM (P < 0.01, Figure 8A). Therefore, we used these as therapeutic doses in subsequent studies. Flow cytometry demonstrated that Aβ25-35 significantly increased apoptosis, ROS, and Ca2+ levels in N9 and PC-12 cells. In N9 (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05, Figures 7B-G) and PC12 (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05, Figures 8B-G) cells, MorA decreased Aβ25-35-induced apoptosis, ROS, and Ca2+ levels to varying degrees. However, the presence of MK-801 inhibited these effects of MorA.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 8
4 Discussion
AD is the most common type of dementia and a 2023 report showed that 6.7 million Americans aged 65 and older currently have AD, which is expected to reach 13.8 million by 2060 (Rostagno, 2022; Alzheimers Dement, 2023). Continuously increasing morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs are placing an enormous burden on families and society. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop an effective treatment modality for AD.
The most prominent feature in the development of AD is an irreversible decline in memory and cognitive functioning (Portelius et al., 2015), which ultimately leads to emotional apathy and behavioral changes. Behavioral experiments provide an important basis for studying emotions and cognitive functions of the brain, and are often used to assess learning memory and cognitive abilities in mice (Araujo et al., 2021; Stover et al., 2015). The Y-maze, NOR, and MWM experiments illustrated that MorA improved learning memory in 5×FAD mice. In addition to memory impairment, imbalance of Aβ production and clearance in the brain leading to Aβ deposition to form senile plaques (SP) is one of the major pathologies of AD (Nilsson and Saido, 2014). Amyloid precursor protein (APP) is broken down by α- and γ-secretase into nontoxic fragments under physiological conditions and by β-secretase and γ-secretase under pathological conditions into fragments such as the toxic Aβ1-42 and Aβ1-40 (Chuang et al., 2021), which accumulate to eventually form age spots. Some studies have shown that a large amount of Aβ aggregates promote Tau protein phosphorylation, accelerating the formation of neurofibrillary tangles and triggering neuronal toxicity (Lee et al., 2022). In addition, Aβ deposition leads to the excessive production of oxygen free radicals and oxidative stress, which ultimately leads to neuronal apoptosis and neuronal necrosis (Eratne et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2018). Our study showed that MorA attenuated neuronal cell atrophy and apoptotic cell number, reduced Aβ plaque formation, and decreased the level of oxidative stress. Thus, MorA ameliorates neurotoxicity and oxidative stress induced by Aβ deposition in the brain tissue of 5×FAD mice.
In addition to Aβ deposition and oxidative stress, the role of the GM in AD has attracted widespread attention (Goyal et al., 2021). There are as many as 100 trillion microorganisms in the human body, and most of them reside in the gastrointestinal tract (Honda and Littman, 2012). It was noted that altered flora composition and dysbiosis were observed in both AD patients and animal models, and that they were strongly associated with Aβ plaque deposition and neuroinflammation (Pasupalak et al., 2024). The use of 16S rDNA sequencing can show changes in flora abundance and to some extent reflect the disease process. 16S rDNA detected differential species in the GM of mice in the model and MorA groups, and MorA increased the abundance of the beneficial bacterium Lactobacillus in 5×FAD mice, while the abundance of Muribaculaceae, Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136, Ruminococcaceae, Prevotellaceae, and Streptococcus decreased. In addition, GM imbalance leads to an imbalance in host immune regulation inducing an inflammatory response, disrupting gut barrier and blood-brain barrier function, and exacerbating the AD process (Cattaneo et al., 2017). The results of the correlation analysis between GM and biochemical indicators demonstrated a significant correlation between GM abundance and the levels of inflammatory factors and oxidative stress-related indicators. Thus, MorA improved AD by modulating the GM.
It has also been demonstrated that Gut microbes can affect the synthesis and release of neurotransmitters such as glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid (Clarke et al., 2014) and participate in the pathogenesis of AD by influencing brain activity and development through the gut–brain axis (Wang and Kasper, 2014). We examined glutamate levels in the brain and found that they were significantly elevated in 5×FAD mice. And pathway prediction showed that MorA treatment of AD involves glutamatergic synapses. Glutamate is an important excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain (Wang et al., 2020) and acts mainly on NMDAR. NMDAR is predominantly found in the postsynaptic membrane of glutamatergic neurons. Its interaction with postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD95) mediates downstream excitotoxicity (Chiu et al., 2019). NMDAR2B, a NMDAR subtype, is primarily involved in synaptic plasticity and learning memory (Maher et al., 2014). When glutamate levels are elevated in the brain, they overstimulate NMDAR2B, leading to increased Ca2+ influx, which induces neuroexcitotoxicity (Findley et al., 2019). We found that NMDAR2B was overactivated by abnormal glutamate levels in 5×FAD mice and that MorA, which binds tightly to NMDAR2B, inhibits NMDAR2B activation. To further investigate whether MorA exerts anti-AD effects via the NMDAR2B, we used N9 and PC12-H cells for in vitro validation with the addition of MK-801, which blocks the action of NMDAR2B (Zeng et al., 2022b). Among the Aβ fragments, Aβ25-35 is the shortest fragment that retains the toxicity of the full-length Aβ (1-40/42) peptide and induces AD (Guo et al., 2022). Therefore, we chose Aβ25-35 to construct the in vitro AD model. The results showed that the ameliorative effect of MorA on Aβ25-35-induced cell damage was reversed by MK-801. The above results suggest that MorA can attenuate brain damage by inhibiting NMDAR2B and attenuating glutamate-induced excitatory neurotoxicity.
5 Conclusion
MorA reduces neurotoxicity and ameliorates learning memory deficits and brain damage in 5×FAD mice by modulating GM and inhibiting NMDAR2B. This research indicates that MorA may be a potential drug for the treatment of AD, and the findings of this study have important implications for the development of Cornus officinalis Sieb. et Zucc. However, there are some limitations in this study. From the results, it can be seen that the effect of MorA at 15 mg/kg is better than that of 30 mg/kg (Figure 2), which suggests that we need to further study the efficacy and toxicological mechanism of MorA.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by the ethics committee of Henan University of Chinese Medicine. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
FH: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. MZ: Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing. BC: Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. XL: Methodology, Writing – original draft. ZH: Methodology, Writing – original draft. KY: Methodology, Writing – original draft. XJ: Methodology, Writing – original draft. WF: Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing. XZ: Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project (2019YFC1708802, 2017YFC1702800), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32200322), key Projects for Science and Technology Development of Henan Province (242102310533).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Abbreviations
AD, Alzheimer’s disease; GM, gut microbiome; MorA, 7-α-O-Methylmonoside; HE, hematoxylin-eosin; NOR, novel object recognition test; MWM, morris water naze; Aβ1−42, beta amyloid beta 1–42; Aβ1−40, beta amyloid beta 1–40; p-Tau, phosphorylated Tau protein; Glu, glutathione; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL-6, Interleukin 6; IL-1β, Interleukin 1 beta; APP, β-amyloid precursor protein; NMDAR2B, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 2B; PSD95, postsynaptic density protein 95; PVDF, polyvinylidene fluoride; DMEM, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; MTT, methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium; SP, senile plaques.
References
1
Alzheimers Dement (2023). 2023 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement.19 (4), 1598–1695. 10.1002/alz.13016
2
AraujoA. P. C.de LucenaJ. D.DrieskensD. C.NevesL. R.PuglianeK. C.BelchiorH. A.et al (2021). Rats recognize spatial and temporal attributes in a new object recognition memory task with multiple trials. J. Neurosci. Methods348, 108936. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108936
3
BanoN.KhanS.AhamadS.KanshanaJ. S.DarN. J.KhanS.et al (2024). Microglia and gut microbiota: a double-edged sword in Alzheimer's disease. Ageing Res. Rev.101, 102515. 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102515
4
BreijyehZ.KaramanR. (2020). Comprehensive review on Alzheimer's disease: causes and treatment. Molecules25 (24), 5789. 10.3390/molecules25245789
5
CaoB.ZengM.ZhangQ.ZhangB.CaoY.WuY.et al (2021). Amentoflavone ameliorates memory deficits and abnormal autophagy in Aβ25-35-induced mice by mTOR signaling. Neurochem. Res.46 (4), 921–934. 10.1007/s11064-020-03223-8
6
CarloniS.RescignoM. (2023). The gut-brain vascular axis in neuroinflammation. Semin. Immunol.69, 101802. 10.1016/j.smim.2023.101802
7
CattaneoA.CattaneN.GalluzziS.ProvasiS.LopizzoN.FestariC.et al (2017). Association of brain amyloidosis with pro-inflammatory gut bacterial taxa and peripheral inflammation markers in cognitively impaired elderly. Neurobiol. Aging49, 60–68. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.08.019
8
ChiuA. M.WangJ.FiskeM. P.HubalkovaP.BarseL.GrayJ. A.et al (2019). NMDAR-activated PP1 dephosphorylates GluN2B to modulate NMDAR synaptic content. Cell Rep.28 (2), 332–341. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.030
9
ChuangY.VanI.ZhaoY.XuY. (2021). Icariin ameliorate Alzheimer's disease by influencing SIRT1 and inhibiting Aβ cascade pathogenesis. J. Chem. Neuroanat.117, 102014. 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2021.102014
10
ClarkeG.StillingR. M.KennedyP. J.StantonC.CryanJ. F.DinanT. G. (2014). Minireview: gut microbiota: the neglected endocrine organ. Mol. Endocrinol.28 (8), 1221–1238. 10.1210/me.2014-1108
11
Da CruzJ. F. O.Gomis-GonzalezM.MaldonadoR.MarsicanoG.OzaitaA.Busquets-GarciaA. (2020). An alternative maze to assess novel object recognition in mice. Bio Protoc.10 (12), e3651. 10.21769/BioProtoc.3651
12
EratneD.LoiS. M.FarrandS.KelsoW.VelakoulisD.LooiJ. C. (2018). Alzheimer's disease: clinical update on epidemiology, pathophysiology and diagnosis. Australas. Psychiatry26 (4), 347–357. 10.1177/1039856218762308
13
FindleyC. A.BartkeA.HascupK. N.HascupE. R. (2019). Amyloid beta-related alterations to glutamate signaling dynamics during Alzheimer's disease progression. ASN Neuro11, 1759091419855541. 10.1177/1759091419855541
14
GeW.RenC.XingL.GuanL.ZhangC.SunX.et al (2021). Ginkgo biloba extract improves cognitive function and increases neurogenesis by reducing Aβ pathology in 5×FAD mice. Am. J. Transl. Res.13 (3), 1471–1482.
15
GoyalD.AliS. A.SinghR. K. (2021). Emerging role of gut microbiota in modulation of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration with emphasis on Alzheimer's disease. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry106, 110112. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110112
16
GuoP.ZengM.WangS.CaoB.LiuM.ZhangY.et al (2022). Eriodictyol and homoeriodictyol improve memory impairment in Aβ25-35-induced mice by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome. Molecules27 (8), 2488. 10.3390/molecules27082488
17
HondaK.LittmanD. R. (2012). The microbiome in infectious disease and inflammation. Annu. Rev. Immunol.30, 759–795. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074937
18
JeongE. J.KimT. B.YangH.KangS. Y.KimS. Y.SungS. H.et al (2012). Neuroprotective iridoid glycosides from Cornus officinalis fruits against glutamate-induced toxicity in HT22 hippocampal cells. Phytomedicine19 (3-4), 317–321. 10.1016/j.phymed.2011.08.068
19
KabirM. T.SufianM. A.UddinM. S.BegumM. M.AkhterS.IslamA.et al (2019). NMDA receptor antagonists: repositioning of memantine as a multitargeting agent for Alzheimer's therapy. Curr. Pharm. Des.25 (33), 3506–3518. 10.2174/1381612825666191011102444
20
KraeuterA. K.GuestP. C.SarnyaiZ. (2019). The Y-maze for assessment of spatial working and reference memory in mice. Methods Mol. Biol.1916, 105–111. 10.1007/978-1-4939-8994-2_10
21
LeeW. J.BrownJ. A.KimH. R.La JoieR.ChoH.LyooC. H.et al (2022). Regional Aβ-tau interactions promote onset and acceleration of Alzheimer's disease tau spreading. Neuron110 (12), 1932–1943.e5. 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.03.034
22
LyuF.HanF.GeC.MaoW.ChenLHuH.et al (2023). OmicStudio: a composable bioinformatics cloud platform with real-time feedback that can generate high-quality graphs for publication. iMeta2, e85. 10.1002/imt2.85
23
MahadevD.KhadgaR.SinghS. (2023). Relevance of gut microbiota to Alzheimer's Disease (AD): potential effects of probiotic in management of AD. Aging Health Res.3 (1), 100128. 10.1016/j.ahr.2023.100128
24
MaherA.El-SayedN. S.BreitingerH. G.GadM. Z. (2014). Overexpression of NMDAR2B in an inflammatory model of Alzheimer's disease: modulation by NOS inhibitors. Brain Res. Bull.109, 109–116. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2014.10.007
25
NafadyM. H.SayedZ. S.AbdelkawyD. A.SheblM. E.ElsayedR. A.AshrafG. M.et al (2022). The effect of gut microbe dysbiosis on the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related conditions. Curr. Alzheimer Res.19 (4), 274–284. 10.2174/1567205019666220419101205
26
NilssonP.SaidoT. C. (2014). Dual roles for autophagy: degradation and secretion of Alzheimer's disease Aβ peptide. Bioessays36 (6), 570–578. 10.1002/bies.201400002
27
OthmanM. Z.HassanZ.Che HasA. T. (2022). Morris water maze: a versatile and pertinent tool for assessing spatial learning and memory. Exp. Anim.71 (3), 264–280. 10.1538/expanim.21-0120
28
PasupalakJ. K.RajputP.GuptaG. L. (2024). Gut microbiota and Alzheimer's disease: exploring natural product intervention and the gut-brain Axis for therapeutic strategies. Eur. J. Pharmacol.984, 177022. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.177022
29
PorteliusE.ZetterbergH.SkillbäckT.TörnqvistU.AndreassonU.TrojanowskiJ. Q.et al (2015). Cerebrospinal fluid neurogranin: relation to cognition and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Brain138 (Pt 11), 3373–3385. 10.1093/brain/awv267
30
RabbitoA.DulewiczM.Kulczyńska-PrzybikA.MroczkoB. (2020). Biochemical markers in Alzheimer's disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21 (6), 1989. 10.3390/ijms21061989
31
RichterN.NellessenN.DronseJ.DillenK.JacobsH. I. L.LangenK. J.et al (2019). Spatial distributions of cholinergic impairment and neuronal hypometabolism differ in MCI due to AD. NeuroImage. Clin.24, 101978. 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101978
32
RostagnoA. A. (2022). Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24 (1), 107. 10.3390/ijms24010107
33
SongZ.QuY.XuY.ZhangL.ZhouL.HanY.et al (2021). Microarray microRNA profiling of urinary exosomes in a 5XFAD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Anim. Model Exp. Med.4 (3), 233–242. 10.1002/ame2.12175
34
StoverK. R.CampbellM. A.Van WinssenC. M.BrownR. E. (2015). Early detection of cognitive deficits in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Behav. Brain Res.289, 29–38. 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.04.012
35
SwerdlowR. H.BurnsJ. M.KhanS. M. (2014). The Alzheimer's disease mitochondrial cascade hypothesis: progress and perspectives. Biochimica Biophysica acta1842 (8), 1219–1231. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.09.010
36
TangB. C.WangY. T.RenJ. (2023). Basic information about memantine and its treatment of Alzheimer's disease and other clinical applications. Ibrain9 (3), 340–348. 10.1002/ibra.12098
37
WangJ.WangF.MaiD.QuS. (2020). Molecular mechanisms of glutamate toxicity in Parkinson's disease. Front. Neurosci.14, 585584. 10.3389/fnins.2020.585584
38
WangY. (2023). The role of the gut microbiota and microbial metabolites in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets22, 577–598. 10.2174/1871527321666220417005115
39
WangY.KasperL. H. (2014). The role of microbiome in central nervous system disorders. Brain Behav. Immun.38, 1–12. 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.12.015
40
WuH. Y.KuoP. C.WangY. T.LinH. T.RoeA. D.WangB. Y.et al (2018). β-Amyloid induces pathology-related patterns of tau hyperphosphorylation at synaptic terminals. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.77 (9), 814–826. 10.1093/jnen/nly059
41
YangM.HaoZ.WangX.ZhouS.ZhuD.YangY.et al (2022). Neocornuside A-D, four novel iridoid glycosides from fruits of Cornus officinalis and their antidiabetic activity. Molecules27 (15), 4732. 10.3390/molecules27154732
42
YuS. P.ChoiE.JiangM. Q.WeiL. (2025). Acute and chronic excitotoxicity in ischemic stroke and late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Neural Regen. Res.20 (7), 1981–1988. 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00398
43
ZengM.FengA.LiM.LiuM.GuoP.ZhangY.et al (2022b). Corallodiscus flabellata B. L. Burtt extract and isonuomioside A ameliorate Aβ25-35-induced brain injury by inhibiting apoptosis, oxidative stress, and autophagy via the NMDAR2B/CamK Ⅱ/PKG pathway. Phytomedicine101, 154114. 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154114
44
ZengM.FengA.ZhaoC.ZhangB.GuoP.LiuM.et al (2022a). Adenosine ameliorated Aβ25-35-induced brain injury through the inhibition of apoptosis and oxidative stress via an ERα pathway. Brain Res.1788, 147944. 10.1016/j.brainres.2022.147944
Summary
Keywords
Alzheimer’s disease, 5×FAD mice, 7-α-O-Methylmorroniside, gut microbiome, NMDAR2B
Citation
Hao F, Zeng M, Cao B, Liang X, Hao Z, Ye K, Jiao X, Feng W and Zheng X (2025) 7-α-O-Methylmorroniside ameliorated brain injury in 5×FAD mice by regulating the gut microbiome and NMDAR2B. Front. Pharmacol. 16:1545566. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1545566
Received
15 December 2024
Accepted
07 April 2025
Published
30 May 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Hua Li, Air Force Medical University, China
Reviewed by
Humberto Salgado, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mexico
Nagendranatha Reddy C., Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology, India
Piyush Padhi, University of Georgia, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Hao, Zeng, Cao, Liang, Hao, Ye, Jiao, Feng and Zheng.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiaoke Zheng, zhengxk.2006@163.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.