Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Pharmacoepidemiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1548126

A systematic review and meta-analysis on how different dexamethasone administration regimes impact total joint arthroplasty outcomes

Provisionally accepted
Can  WangCan Wang1Chenjing  LuoChenjing Luo1Xiaoxue  TangXiaoxue Tang1Li  LuoLi Luo1Yuerong  ZengYuerong Zeng2Yumei  ZhangYumei Zhang3*Xuan  WangXuan Wang1*
  • 1Department of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 2Department of Pharmacy, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, Chongqing, China
  • 3Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Postoperative pain following total joint arthroplasty is a critical factor influencing patient recovery. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of single-dose, repeated-dose, and split-dose perioperative dexamethasone regimens for managing postoperative pain in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty.Methods: Randomized controlled studies (RCTs) comparing repeated or splitdexamethasone to single intravenous dexamethasone in patients having total knee/hip arthroplasty were retrieved from Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Embase databases from inception to October 2024. Using RevMan 5.2, a metaanalysis was performed to evaluate primary outcomes including pain scores, length of stay, and incidence of postoperative rescue analgesia, as well as secondary outcomes such as the incidence of adverse events. Heterogeneity was assessed via I² statistics, and study bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.Results: Twelve trials were included. The results showed that repeated-dose dexamethasone did not differ from single-dose dexamethasone in rest or movement pain scores at 24 hours, but significantly reduced both rest (mean difference [MD]= -0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.62 to -0.29, P < 0.00001, I 2 = 41%) and movement (MD= -0.69, CI: -0.83 to -0.55, P < 0.00001, I 2 = 36%) pain scores at 48 hours. They also had shorter stays (MD = -0.28, 95% CI: -0.47 to -0.09, P =0.004, I 2 = 71%), lower rates of needing postoperative rescue analgesia (relative risk[RR]=0.26, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.63, P =0.003, I 2 = 72%) and postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV] (RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.95, P = 0.04, I 2 = 60%). Moreover, patients receiving a single dose of dexamethasone had lower movement scores 24 hours postoperatively (MD = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.48, P = 0.02, I 2 = 61%) compared to patients with a split-dose of dexamethasone. No significant differences in adverse event rates were observed between single-dose and split-dose dexamethasone.Compared to patients receiving a single-dose or split-dose of dexamethasone, the administration of repeated doses of dexamethasone can mitigate postoperative pain, reduce the requirement for supplementary opioids, shorten the duration of hospitalization, and decrease the incidence of PONV following arthroplasty.

Keywords: Total knee arthroplasty, Total hip arthroplasty, Dexamethasone, Repeated-dose treatment, Split-dose treatment, Single-dose treatment

Received: 19 Dec 2024; Accepted: 26 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Luo, Tang, Luo, Zeng, Zhang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yumei Zhang, Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
Xuan Wang, Department of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.