ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1551390
This article is part of the Research TopicIncreasing Importance of Patients-generated Real World Data for Healthcare Policy Decisions about Medicinal Products: Volume IIIView all 3 articles
Serum Uric Acid Reduction through SGLT2 Inhibitors: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
- 2Department of Pharmacy, Jiangxi Mental Health Center, Nanchang, China, Nanchang, China
- 3State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao Special Administrative Region of China, Macao Special Administrative Region of China, China
- 4West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
- 5West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Elevated serum uric acid (SUA) is strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Sodium-glucose-cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors not only lower blood glucose levels but also reduce UA. However, comparative data on the SUAlowering effects among different SGLT2 inhibitors remain sparse, hindering evidencebased drug selection. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of various SGLT2 inhibitors on SUA.We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Ovid SP), Embase (Ovid SP), PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to March 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The primary outcome was the change in SUA levels compared with placebo. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4. Pooled mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes (SUA change) and relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes (gout incidence) were calculated. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2), and the overall evidence quality was evaluated using the GRADE approach.Results: A total of 51 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The SUA levels were significantly lower in all SGLT2 inhibitors groups than in the placebo groups. SGLT2 inhibitors have superior efficacy in lowering SUA levels compared with placebo [MD = -32.14 μmol/L, 95% CI (-35.96 to -28.31); P < 0.001]. Subgroup analysis showed empagliflozin achieved the greatest reduction in SUA [MD = -45.61 μmol/L, 95% CI (-52.26 to -38.97); P < 0.00001], while sotagliflozin had the least effect [MD = -13.72 μmol/L, 95% CI (-19.16 to -8.29); P < 0.00001]. The GRADE profiles indicated lowquality evidence for reduction in SUA levels. However, there was no difference in the incidence of gout between the two groups [RR = 0.96, 95% CI (0.77 to 1.21), P = 0.75].SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated greater SUA reduction than placebo, highlighting their potential as multifactorial therapies in high-risk populations.
Keywords: sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, With and without T2DM, Serum uric acid, Gout, Meta-analysis
Received: 25 Dec 2024; Accepted: 05 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Hu, Liu, Xiao, Zhang and Su. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Na Su, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.