Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol., 30 October 2025

Sec. Ethnopharmacology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1551652

Assessment of the efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine combined with western medicine for treating severe acute pancreatitis-related acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

Xin Han&#x;Xin Han1Ming Zhang&#x;Ming Zhang2Congcong Dou&#x;Congcong Dou1Lianfeng ShanLianfeng Shan3Qingqiang Ni,
Qingqiang Ni1,2*
  • 1Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
  • 2Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
  • 3Shandong Xinzhonglu Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China

Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) combined with Western medicine (WM) for treating severe acute pancreatitis-related acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (SAP-ALI/ARDS).

Methods: A comprehensive search of 12 English and Chinese databases yielded 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 917 patients. The experimental group received CHM compounds combined with standard WM, while the control group received only WM. Outcomes included clinical efficacy, inflammatory markers (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6), disease progression indicators (e.g., time to abdominal pain relief, ICU stay), and mortality rates. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess study quality, and meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.

Results: The meta-analysis demonstrated that CHM combined with WM significantly improved clinical efficacy (RR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.17–1.37, P < 0.00001), reduced inflammatory markers (e.g., TNF-α: MD = −18.18 pg/mL, P < 0.00001; IL-6: MD = −24.70 pg/mL, P < 0.00001), and shortened disease progression indicators (e.g., time to abdominal pain relief: MD = −1.56 days, P < 0.00001; ICU stay: MD = −3.27 days, P < 0.00001). However, no significant difference in mortality rates was observed (RR = 0.47, P = 0.96).

Conclusion: This study provides robust evidence that the combination of Chinese herbal medicine with Western medicine significantly enhances clinical outcomes for patients with SAP-ALI/ARDS. The findings highlight improvements in inflammatory markers, disease progression indicators, and oxygenation indices. However, the lack of significant differences in mortality rates and the limited methodological rigor of included studies (e.g., blinding and allocation concealment) are notable limitations. Future research should focus on optimizing RCT designs, exploring molecular mechanisms, and investigating long-term outcomes to strengthen the evidence base for integrated therapies.

Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifer CRD42024579735.

Introduction

Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is a life-threatening disease marked by rapid progression, high mortality, and frequent systemic complications (Zerem, 2014). Its development is primarily driven by a massive release of pancreatic inflammatory mediators (Guo et al., 2016), which triggers systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and subsequent multi-organ dysfunction (Garg and Singh, 2019; Hu et al., 2023). Among extrapancreatic organs, the lungs are the most frequently affected, with 15%–60% of SAP patients developing acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The mortality rate for these patients exceeds 60% within the first week (Feng, 2017). The pathogenesis of SAP-ALI/SAP-ARDS involves multiple pathways, including pancreatic elastase-mediated pulmonary damage (Chen et al., 2024), the specific effects of pancreatic enzymes and serum phospholipase A2 (Elder et al., 2012), and the overproduction of oxidative stress factors, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, and cytokines such as Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) (Akbarshahi et al., 2012). Additionally, gastrointestinal dysfunction plays a pivotal role in the pathological process of SAP-induced ALI/ARDS (Lijian et al., 2023). Inflammatory mediators from the pancreas can disrupt the intestinal mucosal barrier, leading to the systemic dissemination of gut-derived endotoxins and bacteria, which exacerbate pulmonary damage and contribute to multi-organ failure (Liang et al., 2021).

Clinically, SAP-ALI/ARDS patients often present with acute respiratory failure, characterized by dyspnea, cyanosis, and hypoxemia. Pathologically, these conditions are marked by reduced lung compliance, increased pulmonary vascular permeability, interstitial fibrosis, and edema. Current therapeutic strategies include oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, thoracocentesis, and continuous blood purification (Guangxu et al., 2022). Continuous blood purification has been shown to effectively remove inflammatory mediators and mitigate organ damage (Chen Feiyang and Xiang, 2024). However, refractory hypoxemia often requires mechanical ventilation, which may lead to complications such as ventilator-associated pneumonia, accounting for 36%–90% of ALI/ARDS-related deaths (Zhang et al., 2023).

Based on the traditional Chinese medical theory of “the lungs and large intestine being anatomically and functionally connected,” integrated Chinese and Western medicine (WM) approaches have garnered significant attention (Yunfeng et al., 2024). A prior systematic review of 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found that adjunctive Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), while not reducing mortality, improved oxygenation indices and shortened mechanical ventilation duration (Ji-Ping et al., 2013). This study aims to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of combining CHM with conventional WM for the treatment of SAP-ALI/ARDS through quality assessment and meta-analysis, providing evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.

Methods

This study adheres strictly to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and is registered on the PROSPERO platform under the registration number CRD42024579735.

Search strategy

A systematic search was conducted across 12 databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest, Scopus, OVID, Chinese Biological Medical Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Duxiu, WanFang, and VIP, to identify clinical studies on the treatment of SAP-ALI/ARDS with CHM, published up to 31 July 2024. Additional studies were identified through reference lists of included articles. The search strategy combined MeSH and free text terms. English search terms included “Pancreatitis,” “Severe Acute Pancreatitis,” “Acute Lung Injury,” “ARDS,” and “Chinese Herbal Medicine.” Chinese search terms included “acute pancreatitis,” “severe acute pancreatitis,” “acute lung injury,” “acute respiratory distress syndrome,” “traditional Chinese medicine,” and “integrative medicine.” The detailed search strategy is provided in Supplementary Table S1.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria: 1) Studies involving participants aged ≥18 years 2) No restrictions based on race or gender. 3) Studies diagnosing SAP and ALI/ARDS according to established criteria. 4) RCTs published internationally that investigated the treatment of SAP-ALI/ARDS with CHM. 5) Interventions: The control group received Western medical treatment (e.g., mechanical ventilation, fasting, gastrointestinal decompression, infection control, and electrolyte balance maintenance). 6) The experimental group received CHM or compound Chinese herbal formulas in addition to conventional treatment. 7) Outcome measures included at least one of the following: clinical efficacy, mortality, pain relief time, first defecation time, bowel sounds recovery time, mechanical ventilation duration, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, oxygenation index, APACHE II score, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) syndrome score, TNF-α, or IL-6. 8) Baseline APACHE II score ≥ 8.

Exclusion Criteria: 1) Non-RCTs (e.g., observational or retrospective studies). 2) Studies that did not use CHM or only used non-pharmacological TCM interventions (e.g., acupuncture or massage). 3) Studies with incomplete data or unavailable full texts. 4) Studies that did not report efficacy outcomes. 5) Studies involving SAP with other severe complications (e.g., pancreatic necrosis or sepsis). 6) Duplicate publications. 7) Animal experiments or non-clinical studies.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Three independent reviewers (XH, MZ and CD) screened the literature according to predefined eligibility criteria. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or arbitration by a third reviewer (QQN). Missing data were sought from the original authors whenever possible. Extracted information included: Basic study characteristics: First author, publication year, study population, study period, region, intervention measures, and control schemes. Outcome measures: Clinical efficacy, mortality, symptom relief time (e.g., pain relief, first defecation, bowel sounds recovery), mechanical ventilation duration, ICU stay, oxygenation index, APACHE II score, TCM syndrome score, and inflammatory biomarkers (TNF-α, IL-6).

The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Two reviewers independently evaluated seven domains: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessors, completeness of outcome data, selective reporting, and other biases. Each domain was categorized as “low risk,” “unclear,” or “high risk.” Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer.

Statistical analysis

Meta-analysis was conducted using Rev Man 5.4 software. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Data with low heterogeneity (I2 ≤ 50%, P > 0.10) were analyzed using a fixed-effect model, while data with high heterogeneity (I2 > 50%, P < 0.10) were analyzed using a random-effects model, followed by sensitivity analyses. Continuous variables (e.g., symptom relief time, APACHE II score, oxygenation index) were analyzed using mean differences (MD) where scales were uniform; otherwise, standardized mean differences (SMD) were applied. Binary variables (e.g., mortality, efficacy rate) were analyzed using risk ratios (RR). Effect sizes were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.

Results

Study selection

The initial search yielded 300 articles The distribution of studies across databases was as follows: PubMed (n = 1), Cochrane Library (n = 4), Web of Science (n = 9), Embase (n = 7), ProQuest (n = 2), OVID (n = 0), Scopus (n = 1), CBM (n = 34), CNKI (n = 42), Duxiu (n = 111), WanFang (n = 80), and VIP (n = 9). After removing duplicates, 178 articles remained. Non-RCTs (e.g., reviews, systematic reviews, and animal studies) were excluded, leaving 75 articles. After screening the abstracts, 58 studies were excluded due to mismatched interventions or outcomes, resulting in 17 articles. Following full-text assessment, one study was excluded due to unavailable full text, and three studies were excluded due to methodological inconsistencies. Ultimately, 13 RCTs were included (Ai, 2024; Chao et al., 2024; Chunyu et al., 2013; Hongjun et al., 2021; Jian-Nan et al., 2012; Li, 2014; Qiong et al., 2019; Xiao-Sheng et al., 2012; Xing et al., 2021; Xing and Kun, 2023; Yu and Fu, 2012; Cheng and He, 2023; Jie et al., 2022). The results of the literature search process are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Forest plot displaying a meta-analysis of three studies. The studies compared experimental and control groups, with mean differences and ninety-five percent confidence intervals provided. Results show overall mean difference of negative one point eighty-four, favoring experimental groups. Heterogeneity is near zero, indicating consistent results across studies. A visual line plot with squares and a diamond represents the aggregate data.

Figure 1. Flow chart of the literature search. CBM, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database SinoMed; CNKI, China National Knowledge Network journal full-text database; Wan Fang, Wan fang data knowledge service platform; VIP, VIP Chinese science and technology periodical database.

Risk of bias

The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The results of the risk of bias assessment are presented in Figures 2, 3. The basic characteristics and intervention details of the included studies are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. The evidence of quality control of Chinese medicine prescriptions in the experimental group included in the systematic review is shown in Table 3.

Figure 2
Forest plot showing the mean differences between experimental and control groups across five studies. Weight percentages and confidence intervals are displayed. Overall mean difference is -24.70, favoring the experimental group. Heterogeneity is moderate with a Chi-squared value of 5.88 and I-squared of 49%. Statistical significance is indicated by a Z-score of 14.75 (P < 0.00001).

Figure 2. Risk of bias graph presented as percentage across all included studies.

Figure 3
Forest plot showing a meta-analysis of five studies comparing experimental and control groups. Each study's mean difference and confidence interval are displayed, with all favoring the experimental group. Total mean difference is negative two point seven three, suggesting a significant effect favoring the experimental intervention. Heterogeneity statistics indicate variability among the studies.

Figure 3. Risk of bias summary of the included studies.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Total sample size of the included literature.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Included literature interventions.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Evidence of quality control of the administered TCM in the trials included in the systematic review.

Random sequence generation

Six studies (Ai, 2024; Chao et al., 2024; Cheng and He, 2023; Hongjun et al., 2021; Jie et al., 2022; Xiao-Sheng et al., 2012) utilized random number tables for randomization, two studies (Qiong et al., 2019; Xing and Kun, 2023) employed block randomization techniques, one study (Jian-Nan et al., 2012) implemented random assignment, another study (Xing et al., 2021) employed random number generation, and one study (Yu and Fu, 2012) used the centralized randomization and drug distribution system from the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Clinical Trial Center. Additionally, two studies (Chunyu et al., 2013; Li, 2014) did not clearly describe their randomization methods, which may impact the validity of their reported outcomes.

Allocation concealment

Except for one study (Yu and Fu, 2012), which mentioned the use of a centralized randomization system for drug allocation, the remaining 12 studies did not provide detailed information on allocation concealment and were therefore assessed as having an unclear risk.

Blinding of participants and personnel

Regarding the blinding method, only one study (Yu and Fu, 2012) explicitly reported the use of a double-blind design, leading to a low-risk assessment. The remaining 12 studies did not mention the blinding of subjects, investigators, or outcome assessors. Considering the challenges in blinding both subjects and investigators, the absence of blinding may significantly affect the results, such as the time for symptoms (e.g., abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, dyspnea) to resolve and the length of hospital stay. Consequently, the lack of blinding for subjects and intervention providers was judged to present a high risk.

Blinding of outcome assessment

Only one article (Yu and Fu, 2012) explicitly stated that the research method employed was a double-blind clinical design, resulting in a low-risk assessment. However, the remaining 12 studies did not mention whether the measurement of outcomes was influenced by the lack of blinding, leading to uncertainty regarding the potential risk associated with not blinding the outcome assessors.

Incomplete outcome data

Four studies (Li, 2014; Qiong et al., 2019; Yu and Fu, 2012; Cheng and He, 2023) reported sample dropouts or deaths, with explicit explanations provided for the dropouts. The remaining nine studies were judged to have low risk.

Selective reporting

One study (Xing and Kun, 2023) was assessed as having a high risk because it did not adhere to predefined analysis plans. One study (Li, 2014) was deemed to have an unclear risk due to the absence of predefined outcome measures. The remaining studies were judged to have low risk.

Other bias

All studies were assessed as having an unclear risk due to insufficient information.

Meta-analysis results

Clinical efficacy

Seven studies (Ai, 2024; Chao et al., 2024; Hongjun et al., 2021; Qiong et al., 2019; Xing et al., 2021; Xing and Kun, 2023; Cheng and He, 2023) demonstrated low heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, P = 0.65). The pooled RR was 1.26 (95% CI: 1.17 to 1.37; Z = 5.90, P < 0.00001), indicating that the combination of CHM and conventional WM was more effective than WM alone (Figure 4).

Figure 4
Forest plot showing the mean difference between experimental and control groups from six studies on a specified outcome. The mean differences are depicted with green squares and confidence intervals as lines. Total effect size indicates a mean difference of negative one point five one, favoring the experimental group with high statistical significance (p < 0.00001). Heterogeneity is low with an I-squared value of thirty-two percent.

Figure 4. Forest map comparison of clinical efficacy between two groups.

Time to abdominal pain relief

Eight studies (Ai, 2024; Chao et al., 2024; Hongjun et al., 2021; Jie et al., 2022; Qiong et al., 2019; Xing et al., 2021; Xing and Kun, 2023; Cheng and He, 2023) exhibited high heterogeneity (I2 = 97%, P < 0.00001). A random-effects model showed a mean difference (MD) of −1.56 days (95% CI: −2.14 to −0.99; Z = 5.35, P < 0.00001), indicating that pain relief was significantly faster in the combination therapy group compared to the WM only group (Figure 5).

Figure 5
Forest plot showing mean differences and confidence intervals across studies comparing experimental and control groups. The plot displays data from seven studies, indicating a total mean difference of -3.27 with a confidence interval of [-4.75, -1.80]. Most studies favor the experimental group. Heterogeneity tests show significant variation (I² = 93%).

Figure 5. Forest map comparison of time to abdominal pain relief between two groups.

Time to first defecation

The initial analysis of five studies (Jian-Nan et al., 2012; Qiong et al., 2019; Xing et al., 2021; Xing and Kun, 2023; Cheng and He, 2023) revealed high heterogeneity (I2 = 80%, P = 0.0005). After excluding Shao 2023 (Xing and Kun, 2023), heterogeneity decreased (I2 = 39%, P = 0.18). The remaining four studies (Jian-Nan et al., 2012; Qiong et al., 2019; Xing et al., 2021; Cheng and He, 2023) were analyzed using a fixed-effect model, yielding an MD of −1.49 days (95% CI: −1.61 to −1.37; Z = 24.07, P < 0.00001), indicating that the time to first defecation was significantly shorter in the combination therapy group (Figure 6).

Figure 6
Forest plot showing mean differences with 95% confidence intervals comparing experimental and control groups across eight studies. The overall effect size is -18.18, favoring the experimental group. Heterogeneity is high with I-squared value at 99%. Significant overall effect with P less than 0.00001.

Figure 6. Forest map comparison of time to first bowel movement between two groups.

Time to bowel sound recovery

Three studies (Ai, 2024; Hongjun et al., 2021; Cheng and He, 2023) showed high heterogeneity (I2 = 85%, P = 0.001). After excluding Lu 2021 (Hongjun et al., 2021), the remaining two studies (Ai, 2024; Cheng and He, 2023) had no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, P = 0.90). A fixed-effect model revealed an MD of −1.84 days (95% CI: −2.12 to −1.55; Z = 12.67, P < 0.00001), indicating faster recovery of bowel sounds in the combination therapy group (Figure 7).

Figure 7
Forest plot displaying the mean differences between experimental and control groups across five studies, with 95% confidence intervals. The overall mean difference is -1.49, indicating a favoring of the experimental group. Total sample size is 288. Heterogeneity is shown with a Chi-squared value of 4.89 and an I-squared value of 39%. The overall effect is significant with a Z-value of 24.07. A green box represents each study's weight, with a diamond indicating the overall effect.

Figure 7. Forest map comparison of time to bowel sound recovery between two groups.

Duration of mechanical ventilation

Five studies (Li, 2014; Qiong et al., 2019; Xing et al., 2021; Xing and Kun, 2023; Yu and Fu, 2012) exhibited high heterogeneity (I2 = 88%, P < 0.00001). A random-effects model showed an MD of −2.73 days (95% CI: −3.59 to −1.87; Z = 6.25, P < 0.00001), indicating that mechanical ventilation duration was significantly shorter in the combination therapy group (Figure 8).

Figure 8
Forest plot illustrating mean differences between experimental and control groups across various studies. Each study's mean, standard deviation (SD), total, and weight are listed. Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals are shown, generally favoring the experimental group. The plot indicates overall heterogeneity and a significant test for overall effect, with a Z-score of 5.35 (P < 0.00001) and an I-squared value of 97 percent.

Figure 8. Forest map comparison of mechanical ventilation duration between two groups.

Oxygenation index

Eleven studies (Chunyu et al., 2013; Hongjun et al., 2021; Jian-Nan et al., 2012; Jie et al., 2022; Li, 2014; Qiong et al., 2019; Xiao-Sheng et al., 2012; Xing et al., 2021; Xing and Kun, 2023; Yu and Fu, 2012; Cheng and He, 2023) showed high heterogeneity (I2 = 93%, P < 0.00001). A random-effects model revealed a mean difference (MD) of 43.68 (95% CI: 27.21 to 60.14; Z = 5.20, P < 0.00001), indicating that the oxygenation index was significantly improved in the combination therapy group (Figure 9).

Figure 9
Forest plot showing risk ratios from seven studies comparing experimental and control groups. Each study lists the number of events, total participants, weight, and risk ratio with confidence intervals. The overall risk ratio is 1.26, indicating a significant effect favoring the experimental group. Total events in experimental and control groups are 281 and 221, respectively. Heterogeneity is low with I² = 0%.

Figure 9. Forest map comparison of oxygenation index between two groups.

Mortality rate

Five studies (Jie et al., 2022; Li, 2014; Xiao-Sheng et al., 2012; Yu and Fu, 2012; Qiong et al., 2019) showed no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, P = 0.96). The pooled RR was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.20 to 1.10; Z = 1.74, P = 0.08), with no significant difference between groups in subgroup analyses (Figure 10).

Figure 10
Forest plot illustrating mean differences between experimental and control groups across several studies. Each study is listed with its respective means, standard deviations, and confidence intervals. A diamond at the bottom represents the overall effect estimate, favoring the experimental group. Heterogeneity and test statistics are provided below the plot.

Figure 10. Forest map comparison of mortality rate between two groups.

TNF-α

Eight studies (Chunyu et al., 2013; Hongjun et al., 2021; Jie et al., 2022; Qiong et al., 2019; Xiao-Sheng et al., 2012; Xing et al., 2021; Chao et al., 2024; Xing and Kun, 2023) exhibited high heterogeneity (I2 = 99%, P < 0.00001). A random-effects model showed a mean difference (MD) of −18.18 pg/mL (95% CI: −23.59 to −12.77; Z = 6.59, P < 0.00001), indicating that TNF-α levels were significantly lower in the combination therapy group (Figure 11).

Figure 11
Forest plot showing the standardized mean differences between experimental and control groups for three studies: Xing and Kun 2023, Qiong et al. 2019, and Jie et al. 2022. The overall effect shows a significant difference favoring the experimental group, with a weighted mean difference of -3.47 within a 95 percent confidence interval of -5.04 to -1.89. Studies show heterogeneity, with I² at 95 percent.

Figure 11. Forest map comparison of TNF-α between two groups. TNF-α, Tumor Necrosis Factor-α.

IL-6

Five studies (Qiong et al., 2019; Xing et al., 2021; Chao et al., 2024; Hongjun et al., 2021; Jie et al., 2022) showed high heterogeneity (I2 = 92%, P < 0.00001). After excluding Xu 2024 (Chao et al., 2024), the remaining four studies (Hongjun et al., 2021; Jie et al., 2022; Qiong et al., 2019; Xing et al., 2021) had reduced heterogeneity (I2 = 49%, P = 0.12). A fixed-effect model revealed a mean difference (MD) of −24.70 pg/mL (95% CI: −27.98 to −21.42; Z = 14.75, P < 0.00001), indicating that IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the combination therapy group (Figure 12).

Figure 12
Bar chart showing risk of bias assessments across seven categories: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other bias. Categories depict low (green), unclear (yellow), and high (red) risk of bias. Random sequence generation and blinding of outcome assessment show mostly low risk. Allocation concealment and incomplete outcome data have a mix of low and unclear risk. Blinding of participants and personnel shows significant high risk. Legend indicates color coding for risk levels.

Figure 12. Forest map comparison of IL-6 between two groups. IL-6, Interleukin-6.

Post-treatment Apache II score

Six studies (Chunyu et al., 2013; Jian-Nan et al., 2012; Jie et al., 2022; Li, 2014; Xing and Kun, 2023; Cheng and He, 2023) exhibited high heterogeneity (I2 = 93%, P < 0.00001). After excluding Shao 2023 (Xing and Kun, 2023), the remaining five studies (Chunyu et al., 2013; Jian-Nan et al., 2012; Jie et al., 2022; Li, 2014; Cheng and He, 2023) had no heterogeneity (I2 = 32%, P = 0.21). A fixed-effect model showed a mean difference (MD) of −1.51 (95% CI: −1.83 to −1.19; Z = 9.20, P < 0.00001), indicating that APACHE II scores were significantly lower in the combination therapy group (Figure 13).

Figure 13
Forest plot showing risk ratios for five studies comparing experimental and control groups. Each study's risk ratio is represented by a blue square, with horizontal lines indicating the 95% confidence interval. The diamond at the bottom represents the overall effect size, with a risk ratio of 0.47 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.20 to 1.10. Heterogeneity is low with Chi squared equals 0.58, degrees of freedom equals four, and I squared equals zero percent.

Figure 13. Forest map comparison of post-treatment APACHE II score between two groups.

ICU stay duration

Seven studies (Hongjun et al., 2021; Jie et al., 2022; Qiong et al., 2019; Xiao-Sheng et al., 2012; Xing et al., 2021; Xing and Kun, 2023; Yu and Fu, 2012) exhibited high heterogeneity (I2 = 93%, P < 0.00001). A random-effects model showed a mean difference (MD) of −3.27 days (95% CI: −4.75 to −1.80; Z = 4.34, P < 0.0001), indicating that ICU stay duration was significantly shorter in the combination therapy group (Figure 14).

Figure 14
Flowchart depicting the selection process of studies for a review. From 300 identified records, 122 duplicates were removed, leaving 178 screened records. After excluding 103 due to various reasons, 75 reports were sought for retrieval. Seventeen reports were assessed for eligibility; four were excluded. Thirteen studies were included in the review.

Figure 14. Forest map comparison of ICU stay duration between two groups. ICU, Intensive Care Unit.

Post-treatment TCM syndrome score

Three studies (Xing and Kun, 2023; Qiong et al., 2019; Jie et al., 2022) showed high heterogeneity (I2 = 95%, P < 0.00001). A random-effects model revealed a mean difference (MD) of −3.47 (95% CI: −5.04 to −1.89; Z = 4.31, P < 0.0001), indicating that TCM syndrome scores were significantly lower in the combination therapy group (Figure 15).

Figure 15
Grid showing risk of bias assessment for various studies from 2012 to 2024. Columns represent different bias types: selection, performance, detection, attrition, reporting, and others. Rows indicate studies. Green circles with plus signs signify low risk, yellow circles with question marks signify unclear risk, and red circles with minus signs signify high risk.

Figure 15. Forest map comparison of TCM Syndrome valuation Score between two groups. TCM, Traditional Chinese Medicine.

Sensitivity analysis

The results for time to pain relief, TNF-α levels, oxygenation index, mechanical ventilation duration, and ICU stay duration remained stable after sequentially excluding individual studies. For time to first defecation, bowel sounds recovery, IL-6 levels, and APACHE II scores, heterogeneity was resolved after excluding outlier studies (Xing and Kun, 2023; Hongjun et al., 2021; Chao et al., 2024), allowing the use of a fixed-effect model.

Publication bias

A funnel plot for the oxygenation index (Chunyu et al., 2013; Hongjun et al., 2021; Jian-Nan et al., 2012; Jie et al., 2022; Li, 2014; Qiong et al., 2019; Xiao-Sheng et al., 2012; Xing et al., 2021; Xing and Kun, 2023; Yu and Fu, 2012; Cheng and He, 2023) showed symmetric distribution of data points, suggesting a low risk of publication bias (Supplementary Figure S1).

Discussion

Existing meta-analyses have primarily focused on evaluating the efficacy of TCM formulas in treating acute pancreatitis (AP) or SAP (Guo et al., 2023), or exploring the role of TCM in intervening in ALI or ARDS (Guo et al., 2021). However, there is limited systematic research on the clinical benefits of integrated Chinese and WM in treating SAP-related ALI/ARDS. This study is the first to evaluate the efficacy of such integrated therapies through a meta-analysis, incorporating evidence from 13 RCTs. The results demonstrate that the combination of Chinese herbal compound therapy with conventional WM significantly alleviates SAP-ALI/ARDS related injury and improves clinical outcomes. Compared to WM alone, the integrated treatment group showed significant reductions in pain relief time, first defecation time, bowel sounds recovery time, mechanical ventilation duration, and ICU stay duration. Additionally, the combination therapy improved the oxygenation index and reduced levels of inflammatory biomarkers (TNF-α, IL-6), as well as APACHE II scores and TCM syndrome scores.

Five core TCM treatment strategies were identified in the included studies: Clear heat and promote bowel movements, Warm yang and dissipate cold, Promote bowel movements and expel water, Release the exterior and purge the interior, and Clear heat in the liver and gallbladder. The most frequently used strategy was Clear heat and promote bowel movements, represented by formulas such as Qingfei Chengqi Granules, Laifu Chengqi Decoction, and Da Chengqi Decoction. Warm yang and dissipate cold was typified by Dahuang Fuzi Decoction, while Promote bowel movements and expel water utilized drug like Euphorbia kansui. Release the exterior and purge the interior was represented by Maxing Shigan Decoction, and six studies (Li, 2014; Hongjun et al., 2021; Xing et al., 2021; Ai, 2024; Cheng and He, 2023; Xing and Kun, 2023) employed a strategy that combines the methods of clearing liver and gallbladder heat with purging heat and promoting bowel movements, using Qingyi Decoction as the representative formula (see Tables 2 and 3 for details). Note: The treatment principles/methods and therapies related to TCM in this chapter are derived from the WHO international standard terminologies on TCM.

Clear heat and promote bowel movements, Warm yang and dissipate cold, and Promote bowel movements and expel water are categorized under the broader TCM concept of Purgative methods, which focuses on the use of purgative medications to eliminate intestinal stagnation. These subcategories are distinguished based on their mechanisms of action and clinical applications.

Clear heat and promote bowel movements is a treatment method to clear heat, reduce fire and unblock the bowel. It is indicated for heat accumulating in the large intestine. Commonly used medications include Rheum palmatum and Citrus aurantium. Classical formulas such as Da Chengqi Decoction have been shown to reduce intestinal inflammatory factors, lower serum amylase levels, and alleviate abdominal pressure while protecting the intestinal barrier (Huo et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2023; Zhu et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2012). In rat models, Zhao et al. demonstrated that Da Chengqi Decoction significantly reduced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 mRNA and IL-6 mRNA in lung tissue (Zhao et al., 2011). Four studies (Chao et al., 2024; Jian-Nan et al., 2012; Qiong et al., 2019; Yu and Fu, 2012) combined purgative formulas with lung-protective herbs like Trichosanthes kirilowii and Pinellia ternata to treat SAP-related lung injury. Dahuang Mudan Decoction has been shown to inhibit the release of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8, reduce the migration of intestinal toxins, and suppress pancreatic enzyme activity (Siyuan et al., 2024; Yanzhe, 2021). Animal studies further indicate that this decoction improves lung inflammation and cell apoptosis by regulating PI3K-AKT gene expression (Dan et al., 2022).

Warm yang and dissipate cold is a treatment method to combine purgative, yang warming and cold-dissipating medicines. It is indicated for conditions due to excessive cold retention. This approach combines warming drugs (Aconitum carmichaeli and Asarum) with purgative medications like Rheum palmatum. One study (Chunyu et al., 2013) found that Dahuang Fuzi Decoction inhibits NF-κB activation, downregulates pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β, and alleviates SAP-related lung injury by halting disease progression.

Promote bowel movements and expel water is a treatment method to use purgative medicines to resolve water retention. It is indicated for conditions due to internal retention of water fluid. This therapy is effective in treating various acute abdominal syndromes caused by the accumulation of fluids and qi stagnation. Herbs like Euphorbia kansui is utilized in this therapy to promote diuresis and eliminate phlegm, helping to expel excess fluids through the large intestine. This approach aligns with the TCM principle that associates the lungs with the large intestine, reflecting the theory of “the lungs connect with the large intestine, and the intestine is the organ of transmission.” It embodies the TCM concept of the interrelationship between the lungs and the large intestine. Modern research indicates that these herbs may alleviate pulmonary fibrosis and reduce lung tissue inflammation (Xiaoting, 2022).

Release the exterior and purge the interior is a treatment method to combine purgative and exterior-releasing medicines. It is indicated for excess pattern involving both the exterior and interior. The classical formula Maxing Shigan Decoction exemplifies this approach, adhering to the “junior, minister, assistant, and servant” principle: Ephedra sinica (junior) induces sweating to resolve the exterior, Gypsum (minister) clears lung heat, Prunus mandshurica (assistant) lowers lung qi, and Glycyrrhiza uralensis (servant) harmonizes the effects of the other herbs. This combination achieves both exterior and interior resolution, improving lung function and alleviating dyspnea. Modern studies suggest that Maxing Shigan Decoction may modulate intestinal microbiota, influencing metabolic pathways such as palmitic acid, malic acid, and phosphate production, thereby mediating its therapeutic effects on lung injury (Zhao Jiayao, 2024).

The combination treatment of Clear heat in the liver and gallbladder and Clear heat and promote bowel movements is a specialized TCM intervention targeting the dual pathophysiological mechanisms of “shaoyang dysfunction” and “yangming intestinal heat obstruction” in the context of acute pancreatitis. The representative formula for this approach is Qingyi Decoction. The core herbal pair for this strategy is Bupleurum chinense and Scutellaria baicalensis, which work synergistically to resolve gallbladder stagnation and clear intestinal heat. Purgative combinations, such as Rheum palmatum and Mirabilite, enhance intestinal motility and bile secretion, reducing toxin accumulation and suppressing systemic inflammation. As the representative formula for the combined therapy of Clear heat in the liver and gallbladder and Clear heat and promote bowel movements, Qingyi Decoction has been shown to activate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, inhibit apoptosis of alveolar epithelial cells, and play a critical role in lung repair following lung injuries related to SAP (Yin et al., 2024).

The high application rate of Purgative methods interventions in this study substantiates the core therapeutic principle of TCM, “promoting Qi in the viscera leads to the regulation of Qi in the lungs.” This gut-targeted therapeutic strategy for respiratory conditions aligns with modern medical “gut-lung axis” theory, as SAP can disrupt gut microbiota, leading to dual mechanical and immune barrier damage in the intestinal mucosa. This disruption facilitates the mislocation of endotoxins and microbial metabolites via the portal venous system, activating inflammatory signaling pathways such as TLR4/NF-κB. These pathways trigger systemic inflammatory cascades, exacerbating alveolar-capillary barrier dysfunction (Kahalehili et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2019; Dickson et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2022a; Espirito et al., 2021; Junxi et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2022b). The “pancreas-intestine-inflammation-endotoxin-lung” pathological cascade model proposed by the Ge team further elucidates this process, involving abnormal activation of pancreatic enzymes, dysregulated intestinal microbial metabolism, and systemic systemic inflammatory response syndrome (Ge et al., 2020). One study demonstrates the potential of TCM in modulating multiple key signaling pathways, such as NF-κB, MAPK, JAK2/STAT3, NLRP3 inflammasome, Notch, Rho/ROCK, and Nrf2/ARE, in reducing inflammation, suppressing oxidative stress, and inhibiting apoptosis (Huan Chen, 2023).

Notably, this meta-analysis included 36 traditional Chinese herbal medications, with a significant proportion being laxative-type drugs (Supplementary Figure S2). Among these, Rheum palmatum was frequently used. Emodin, a primary active component of Rheum palmatum, exhibits multi-mechanistic effects in treating SAP-associated ALI. It regulates long non-coding RNA (lncRNA)-mRNA networks, modulating the expression of inflammatory genes (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6) and tissue repair genes (e.g., HO-1) to achieve its anti-inflammatory and protective effects (Xu et al., 2021). Experimental studies have demonstrated that emodin alleviates ALI associated with SAP by downregulating PBEF expression, promoting polymorphonuclear neutrophil apoptosis, and inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated neutrophil recruitment (Cui et al., 2017; Jiang et al., 2021). Clinical evidence indicates that formulations combining Rheum palmatum, Mirabilite and Citrus aurantium demonstrate remarkable efficacy in improving oxygenation indices and reducing inflammatory markers in SAP-related ALI/ARDS (Zhao et al., 2015).

From a mechanistic perspective, the traditional Chinese medical approach of “treating the lungs by regulating the intestines” aligns with modern “gut-lung axis” theory (Yue et al., 2023). This study confirms that purgative medications modulate gut microbiota, reducing the overgrowth of harmful bacteria and the release of inflammatory substances such as lipopolysaccharides and peptidoglycans. These substances, when circulating through the gut-lung axis, stimulate inflammatory and immune responses in the lungs. Additionally, purgative drugs promote the growth of beneficial bacteria, enhance intestinal barrier function, and block pathogen translocation, effectively interrupting pathological communication along the “gut-lung axis” and mitigating pulmonary diseases (Zhu Jie, 2024). This “treat the lungs by treating the intestines” paradigm provides a molecular biological interpretation of traditional Chinese viscera-related theories. By systematically integrating traditional and modern medical frameworks, this study reveals the deep interplay between traditional medical practices and modern mechanistic research in the context of SAP-associated multi-organ dysfunction, laying a theoretical foundation for the development of innovative integrative therapeutic strategies.

This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a novel contribution to the existing literature by evaluating the efficacy of CHM combined with WM for treating SAP-related ALI/ARDS. Compared to previous meta-analyses, such as those focusing on Chinese medicine injections for ALI/ARDS or Chengqi-series decoctions for SAP, this study offers a more comprehensive approach by integrating CHM with conventional Western medical treatments. While earlier studies demonstrated the potential benefits of individual Chinese medicine injections or Chengqi-series decoctions, they were limited to specific interventions and did not explore the synergistic effects of combined therapies. For instance, Jie Guo et al. (Guo et al., 2021) literature focused on network meta-analysis of Chinese medicine injections, highlighting Xuebijing and Tanreqing as effective adjuvant treatments, but it did not address the integration of CHM with WM. Similarly, Juan Lin et al. (Lin et al., 2023) literature on Chengqi-series decoctions for SAP showed improved clinical outcomes, but it did not extend to SAP-related ALI/ARDS or the combination of CHM with Western interventions.

Our study builds on these findings by addressing the clinical efficacy of CHM-WM combination therapy, demonstrating significant improvements in disease progression indicators, oxygenation index, and inflammatory biomarkers. The results align with previous studies in showing reduced mechanical ventilation duration and improved APACHE II scores but extend these findings to the specific context of SAP-ALI/ARDS. A key innovation of this study is its focus on the gut-lung axis, providing mechanistic insights into how CHM may modulate bacterial-immune interactions and inflammatory pathways. This adds a new layer of understanding to the existing evidence, highlighting the potential of integrated therapies to address both local and systemic inflammation. Furthermore, the identification of core TCM treatment strategies, such as purgative methods, offers a theoretical framework for future research and clinical practice. Overall, this study fills a critical gap in the literature by providing robust evidence for the efficacy of CHM-WM combination therapy in SAP-ALI/ARDS, while also offering new perspectives on its underlying mechanisms.

Methodological Improvements: Future RCTs should prioritize concealed allocation, blinding, and standardized endpoint measures, including quality-of-life assessments. Clinical Validation: Larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the effects on mortality outcomes, and further optimization of herbal formula dosages and treatment durations is required. Mechanistic Exploration: Research should focus on the gut-lung axis, particularly bacterial-immune interactions and inflammatory mediator regulation, to deepen the understanding of TCM’s “lung-intestine interrelatedness” theory. Addressing these gaps will enhance the understanding of the mechanisms underlying the efficacy of integrated Chinese and WM in treating SAP-ALI/ARDS, fostering the integration of evidence-based medicine and translational research.

Conclusion

Integrated CHM-WM therapy significantly improves clinical outcomes for patients with SAP-associated ALI/ARDS, particularly mitigating inflammation and accelerating disease resolution. Future research should prioritize the optimization of RCTs designs, including the implementation of blinding protocols, and investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the gut-lung axis to further substantiate the evidence base.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

XH: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Data curation, Writing – review and editing. MZ: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Data curation. CD: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – review and editing. LS: Investigation, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft. QN: Methodology, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province of China (No. tsqn202306374).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1551652/full#supplementary-material

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 1 | Funnel plot of comparison of oxygenation index.

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 2 | Frequency of use of Chinese medicine included in the study.

References

Ai, H. (2024). Exploration on the application value and action mechanism of Qingyi Decoction in the treatment of acute pancreatitis related lung injury based on changes of PI3K/PKB signaling pathways. J. Sichuan Traditional Chin. Med. 42 (3), 97–100.

Google Scholar

Akbarshahi, H., Rosendahl, A. H., Westergren-Thorsson, G., and Andersson, R. (2012). Acute lung injury in acute pancreatitis--awaiting the big leap. Respir. Med. 106 (9), 1199–1210. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2012.06.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chao, X., Meng, S., and Lihua, Q. (2024). Effect of Dachengqi decoction nasal feeding on oxygenation index, inflammatory factors, and intestinal mucosal barrier function in patients with severe pancreatitis complicated with lung injury. J. Sichuan Traditional Chin. Med. 42 (3), 101–105.

Google Scholar

Chen, J., Zhu, X., Wang, Z., Rutzler, M., Lu, Q., Xu, H., et al. (2024). Inhibition of aquaporin-9 ameliorates severe acute pancreatitis and associated lung injury by NLRP3 and Nrf2/HO-1 pathways. Int. Immunopharmacol. 137, 112450. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112450

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen Feiyang, X. R. H. X., and Xiang, L. (2024). Study on the clinical effect of initiating continuous blood purification at different times for severe acute pancreatitis. Chin. Crit. Care Med. 36 (9), 937–942. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240408-00317

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, R., and He, Q. (2023). “Clinical Observation on the Treatment of SAP (Blood Stasis and Toxin Combined Type) Combined with ALI with Jiawei Qingyi Decoction and CBP,”. Kunming City, Yunnan: Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine. [China].

Google Scholar

Chunyu, L., Xiaoguang, L., Libin, Z., Xin, K., Jian, Y., Zhiwei, F., et al. (2013). Efficacy analysis of Dahuang Fuzi Decotion on treating severe acute pancreatitis in patients with ARDS. Chin. J. Emerg. Med. 22 (4), 404–408. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2013.04.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cui, H., Li, S., Xu, C., Zhang, J., Sun, Z., and Chen, H. (2017). Emodin alleviates severe acute pancreatitis-associated acute lung injury by decreasing pre-B-cell colony-enhancing factor expression and promoting polymorphonuclear neutrophil apoptosis. Mol. Med. Rep. 16 (4), 5121–5128. doi:10.3892/mmr.2017.7259

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dan, Y., Yinfeng, S., Min, B., Bing, S., Yanying, Z., Yongfeng, W., et al. (2022). Effects of Dahuang Mudan Decoction on Apoptosis and Inflammatory Reaction in Lung Tissue of Rats with Acute Pancreatitis Based on PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway. Chin. J. Inf. Traditional Chin. Med. 29 (7), 73–79. doi:10.19879/j.cnki.1005-5304.202111406

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dickson, R. P., Singer, B. H., Newstead, M. W., Falkowski, N. R., Erb-Downward, J. R., Standiford, T. J., et al. (2016). Enrichment of the lung microbiome with gut bacteria in sepsis and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat. Microbiol. 1 (10), 16113. doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elder, A. S., Saccone, G. T., and Dixon, D. L. (2012). Lung injury in acute pancreatitis: mechanisms underlying augmented secondary injury. Pancreatology 12 (1), 49–56. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2011.12.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Espirito, S. C., Caseiro, C., Martins, M. J., Monteiro, R., and Brandao, I. (2021). Gut Microbiota, in the Halfway between Nutrition and Lung Function. Nutrients 13 (5), 1716. doi:10.3390/nu13051716

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, D. (2017). Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated by Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, in The Integrated Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis with Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, ed by F. Dianxu (Beijing: Science Press), 104–105.

Google Scholar

Garg, P. K., and Singh, V. P. (2019). Organ Failure Due to Systemic Injury in Acute Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 156 (7), 2008–2023. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ge, P., Luo, Y., Okoye, C. S., Chen, H., Liu, J., Zhang, G., et al. (2020). Intestinal barrier damage, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and acute lung injury: A troublesome trio for acute pancreatitis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 132, 110770. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110770

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guangxu, J., Hongyin, L., Zhu, H., Zhangpeng, W., Hongyu, S., and Lijun, T. (2022). Mechanism of lung injury associated with severe acute pancreatitis and its treatment:recent advances. Chin. J. General Surg. 31 (3), 405–409. doi:10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.2022.03.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, H., Suo, D. W., Zhu, H. P., Sun, X. M., and Chen, J. (2016). Early blood purification therapy of severe acute pancreatitis complicated by acute lung injury. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 20 (5), 873–878.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Guo, J., Zhu, J., Wang, Q., Wang, J., and Jia, Y. (2021). Comparative Efficacy of Seven Kinds of Chinese Medicine Injections in Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 627751. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.627751

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, W. X., Lu, X. G., Zhan, L. B., and Song, Y. (2023). Chinese herbal medicine therapy for hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 27 (6), 2256–2276. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202303_31760

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hongjun, L., Danping, H., Bing, L., and Peiqing, Y. (2021). Clinical Study on Qingyi Xianxiong Decoction in Treating Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated with Acute Lung Injury. Res. Integr. Traditional Chin. West. Med. 13 (3), 154–158.

Google Scholar

Hu, Q., Zhang, S., Yang, Y., Li, J., Kang, H., Tang, W., et al. (2023). Extracellular Vesicle ITGAM and ITGB2 Mediate Severe Acute Pancreatitis-Related Acute Lung Injury. ACS Nano 17 (8), 7562–7575. doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c12722

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huan Chen, B. N. J. Z. (2023). Research Progress on the Regulatory Signaling Pathways of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated by Acute Lung Injury. J. Emerg. Traditional Chin. Med. 32 (9), 1664–1668.

Google Scholar

Huang, L., Wang, M. H., Cheng, Z. Y., Xue, P., Jin, T., Yang, X. N., et al. (2012). Effects of Chai-Qin-Cheng-Qi decoction on acute pancreatitis-associated lung injury in mice with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Chin. J. Integr. Med. doi:10.1007/s11655-012-1207-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huo, J., Wang, T., Wei, B., Shi, X., Yang, A., Chen, D., et al. (2022). Integrated network pharmacology and intestinal flora analysis to determine the protective effect of Xuanbai-Chengqi decoction on lung and gut injuries in influenza virus-infected mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 298, 115649. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2022.115649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ji-Ping, Z., Zi-Kai, S., and Lei, L. (2013). Tongfuxiexia Method Plus Mechanical Ventilation in ALI/ARDS: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Emerg. Traditional Chin. Med. 22 (10), 1690–1692+1702.

Google Scholar

Jian-Nan, Y. U., Li, K., Jian, W., Jian, L., and Sheng-Yi, Y. (2012). Therapeutic effect of Laifuchengqi Tang on severe acute pancreatitis associated lung injury patients. Int. J. Respir. 32 (11), 859–862. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-436X.2012.011.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, N., Li, Z., Luo, Y., Jiang, L., Zhang, G., Yang, Q., et al. (2021). Emodin ameliorates acute pancreatitis-induced lung injury by suppressing NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated neutrophil recruitment. Exp. Ther. Med. 22 (2), 857. doi:10.3892/etm.2021.10289

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jie, L., Ping, W., Jing, Y., Huiping, W., and Hui, Z. (2022). Influence of Acupuncture Combined with Modified Maxing Shigan Decoction on Peripheral Blood NGAL and TLR4 in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis Associated Acute Lung Injury. J. Emerg. Traditional Chin. Med. 31 (12), 2132–2135+2143.

Google Scholar

Junxi, S., Xing, Z., Yunzhi, C., and Wen, L. (2023). Exploring Relationship between Lung and Gut Microbiota and Their Interaction and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Lung - Gut Axis. Chin. Archives Traditional Chin. Med. 41 (8), 181–186. doi:10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2023.08.037

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kahalehili, H. M., Newman, N. K., Pennington, J. M., Kolluri, S. K., Kerkvliet, N. I., Shulzhenko, N., et al. (2020). Dietary Indole-3-Carbinol Activates AhR in the Gut, Alters Th17-Microbe Interactions, and Exacerbates Insulitis in NOD Mice. Front. Immunol. 11, 606441. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.606441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S. (2014). Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Combination Therapy. Liaoning J. Traditional Chin. Med. 41 (3), 521–522. doi:10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2014.03.058

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liang, X. Y., Jia, T. X., and Zhang, M. (2021). Intestinal bacterial overgrowth in the early stage of severe acute pancreatitis is associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. World J. Gastroenterol. 27 (15), 1643–1654. doi:10.3748/wjg.v27.i15.1643

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lijian, L., Huanying, Z., Yuanyuan, L., Liqun, L. I., Chengning, Y., Guangwen, C., et al. (2023). Research Progress in the Treatment of Severe Acute Pancreatitis and Its Complications with Traditional Chinese Medicine. J. Liaoning Univ. Traditional Chin. Med. 25 (11), 14–19. doi:10.13194/j.issn.1673-842x.2023.11.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, J., Han, C., Dai, N., Bi, S., Du, D., and Xia, Q. (2023). Effectiveness of Chengqi-series decoctions in treating severe acute pancreatitis: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. Phytomedicine 113, 154727. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2023.154727

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., Yuan, L., Tang, Y., Wu, Y., Kong, J., Zhou, B., et al. (2023). Da-Cheng-Qi decoction improves severe acute pancreatitis-associated acute lung injury by interfering with intestinal lymphatic pathway and reducing HMGB1-induced inflammatory response in rats. Pharm. Biol. 61 (1), 144–154. doi:10.1080/13880209.2022.2160768

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qiong, Y., Feiyue, D., Zhihua, G., Bo, Z., Jinhai, Y., Qingyang, C., et al. (2019). Clinical Observation on Modified Dachengqi Decoction Retention Enema in the Treatment of 45 Cases of Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Fu-Viscera Excess and Heat Stagnasis Syndrome. J. Traditional Chin. Med. 60 (19), 1657–1662. doi:10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2019.19.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Siyuan, G., Guilin, Y., Yaorong, G., Na, B., and Yang, T. (2024). Clinical Observation on the Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis with Modified Dahuang Mudan Decoction Combined with Chinese Medicine Enema. J. Emerg. Traditional Chin. Med. 33 (7), 1204–1207.

Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Li, F., Liu, J., Luo, Y., Guo, H., Yang, Q., et al. (2022a). Intestinal Microbiota - An Unmissable Bridge to Severe Acute Pancreatitis-Associated Acute Lung Injury. Front. Immunol. 13, 913178. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.913178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Liu, J., Li, F., Luo, Y., Ge, P., Zhang, Y., et al. (2022b). The gut-lung axis in severe acute Pancreatitis-associated lung injury: The protection by the gut microbiota through short-chain fatty acids. Pharmacol. Res. 182, 106321. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao-Sheng, Z., Cheng-Jiang, Q., You-Xing, H., Zhan-Tao, S., Zhi-Peng, Z., Li-Jun, L., et al. (2012). Clinical study on Kanziol in treatment of severer acute pancreatitis complicated by acute lung injury. J. Clin. Med. Pract. 16 (11), 40–42. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2353.2012.11.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiaoting, N. X. W. Y. (2022). Effect of Shizao Decoction on Expression of LN and PDGF in Lung Tissues of Rats with Pulmonary Fibrosis. WORLD Chin. Med. 17 (5), 699–703.

Google Scholar

Xing, S., and Kun, C. (2023). Efficacy of Qingyi Tongfu Tiaofei Yin Combined with Sequential Mechanical Ventilation on Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Caused by Severe Acute Pancreatitis. Chin. Archives Traditional Chin. Med. 41 (2), 196–200. doi:10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2023.02.044

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xing, S., Hongjie, T., Jing, X., Xiuqi, Z., and Kun, C. (2021). Clinical Study on Qingyi Tongfu Tiaofei Yin Combined with Western Medicine for Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. New Chin. Med. 53 (7), 81–84. doi:10.13457/j.cnki.jncm.2021.07.021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, C., Luo, Y., Ntim, M., Quan, W., Li, Z., Xu, Q., et al. (2021). Effect of emodin on long non-coding RNA-mRNA networks in rats with severe acute pancreatitis-induced acute lung injury. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 25 (4), 1851–1866. doi:10.1111/jcmm.15525

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, S., Li, X., Yang, F., Zhao, R., Pan, X., Liang, J., et al. (2019). Gut Microbiota-Dependent Marker TMAO in Promoting Cardiovascular Disease: Inflammation Mechanism, Clinical Prognostic, and Potential as a Therapeutic Target. Front. Pharmacol. 10, 1360. doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01360

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yanzhe, Z. (2021). Clinical Observation on Dahuang Mudan Decoction in the Treatment of Severe Acute Pancreatitis. Chin. Med. Mod. Distance Educ. China 19 (24), 81–83.

Google Scholar

Yin, W., Bu-Yue, B., and Hai-Long, C. (2024). Based on Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway to explore mechanism of Qingyi decoction in promoting repair of alveolar epithelial cell damage in severe acute pancreatitis. Chin. J. Surg. Integr. Traditional West. Med. 30 (4), 486–492.

Google Scholar

Yu, Y., and Fu, Q. (2012). The Mechanism Research in the Treatment of Qing Fei Cheng Qi Granules in Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated with ALI/ARDS. China: Tianjin Medical University. Tianjin Medical University.

Google Scholar

Yue, W., Qimeng, W., Yuyang, L., Yujie, J., Gaofan, X., Xiao, W., et al. (2023). Exploration on the Mechanism of Tongfu Xiexia Therapy for the Treatment of Acute Lung Injury in Severe Acute Pancreatitis Based on the Theory of “Lung and Intestine are Related”. Chin. J. Inf. Traditional Chin. Med. 30 (12), 11–15. doi:10.19879/j.cnki.1005-5304.202211009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yunfeng, C., Ximo, W., and Dong, S. (2024). Guidelines for integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine diagnosis and treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. J. Clin. Hepatology 40 (6), 1114–1125.

Google Scholar

Zerem, E. (2014). Treatment of severe acute pancreatitis and its complications. World J. Gastroenterol. 20 (38), 13879–13892. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13879

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Ge, P., Liu, J., Luo, Y., Guo, H., Zhang, G., et al. (2023). Glucocorticoid Treatment in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Overview on Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Benefit. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (15), 12138. doi:10.3390/ijms241512138

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, J., Chen, J., Tang, W., Wan, L., Xiong, W., and Zhou, L. (2011). Effect of Da-Cheng-Qi decoction on pancreatitis-associated lung injury in patients and anti-inflammatory responses in rat models. Pharm. Biol. 49 (10), 1058–1064. doi:10.3109/13880209.2011.565059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, J., Zhong, C., He, Z., Chen, G., and Tang, W. (2015). Effect of da-cheng-qi decoction on pancreatitis-associated intestinal dysmotility in patients and in rat models. Evid.-based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 895717. doi:10.1155/2015/895717

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao Jiayao, B. C. (2024). Correlation analysis of the effect of Maxing Shigan Decoction on intestinal flora and metabolites in rats with lung injury. Glob. Tradit. Chin. Med. 17 (2), 217–222.

Google Scholar

Zhu, H., Wang, S., Shan, C., Li, X., Tan, B., Chen, Q., et al. (2021). Mechanism of protective effect of xuan-bai-cheng-qi decoction on LPS-induced acute lung injury based on an integrated network pharmacology and RNA-sequencing approach. Respir. Res. 22 (1), 188. doi:10.1186/s12931-021-01781-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu Jie, L. J. Z. M. (2024). Relationship Between Gut Microbiota and Lung Disease Prevention and Treatment Based on Theory of Interaction between Lung and Large Intestine. Basic Tradit. Chin. Med. 3 (9), 61–66. doi:10.20065/j.cnki.btcm.20240181

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Chinese herbal medicine, severe acute pancreatitis, acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, randomized controlled trials

Citation: Han X, Zhang M, Dou C, Shan L and Ni Q (2025) Assessment of the efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine combined with western medicine for treating severe acute pancreatitis-related acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. Front. Pharmacol. 16:1551652. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1551652

Received: 07 January 2025; Accepted: 23 September 2025;
Published: 30 October 2025.

Edited by:

Javier Echeverria, University of Santiago, Chile

Reviewed by:

Sushil Kumar Chaudhary, Institute of Bio-Resources and Sustainable Development (IBSD), India
Qi Yang, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China

Copyright © 2025 Han, Zhang, Dou, Shan and Ni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Qingqiang Ni, bmlxaW5ncWlhbmdAc2RmbXUuZWR1LmNu

These authors share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.