Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Experimental Pharmacology and Drug Discovery

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1556108

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing Glioma Treatment: Novel Drugs, Mechanisms of Resistance, and Therapeutic StrategiesView all 12 articles

Prognostic Value of the Pre-treatment Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio in Patients with Lower-Grade Glioma: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Provisionally accepted
Huang  XiaomingHuang Xiaoming1,2*Lingjuan  LiLingjuan Li1,2,3*Di  ZangDi Zang1,2,3,4*
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
  • 2National Center for Neurological Disorders, Shanghai, 200030, China, shanghai, China
  • 3Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function Restoration and Neural Regeneration, Shanghai, 200030, China, shanghai, China
  • 4Department of Neurosurgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) has emerged as a novel prognostic predictor in various solid tumors. This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of pre-treatment AAPR in patients with lower-grade glioma (LGG) through propensity score matching (PSM), Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox regression analysis, and the development of a predictive nomogram. A total of 225 LGG patients were included in the analysis. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis revealed a nonlinear relationship between AAPR and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0349). Prognostic evaluation, stratifying patients based on the median AAPR value of 0.704, indicated that patients in the AAPR-High group (AAPR ≥ 0.704) experienced significantly favorable overall survival (log-rank p = 0.0042) and progression-free survival (PFS) (log-rank p = 0.042) compared to those in the AAPR-Low group (AAPR < 0.704). Furthermore, analysis stratified by various prognostic factors suggested that AAPR possesses greater predictive value in low-risk LGG patients. Univariate Cox analysis confirmed that higher AAPR levels were significantly associated with improved OS (p = 0.005, HR = 0.541, 95% CI: 0.353-0.829), while multivariate Cox analysis identified AAPR as an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.046, HR = 0.630, 95% CI: 0.400-0.993). A nomogram incorporating AAPR and other prognostic factors demonstrated robust predictive accuracy for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS, with validation in the PSM cohort. In conclusion, pre-treatment AAPR is a simple, convenient, and non-invasive biomarker with significant prognostic value for LGG patients.

Keywords: AAPR, LGG, biomarker, prognosis, Propensity score matching 1

Received: 06 Jan 2025; Accepted: 04 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Xiaoming, Li and Zang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Huang Xiaoming, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Lingjuan Li, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Di Zang, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.