METHODS article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1558556
Methodological Study Protocol for The European Atlas of Clinical Trials in Cancer and Haematology
Provisionally accepted- 1Workgroup of European Cancer Patient Advocacy Networks, Barcelona, Spain
- 2European Patient Advocacy Institute, Riemerling, Germany
- 3VHL Europa, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 4Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- 5PNH Global Alliance, Tiel, Netherlands
- 6Myeloma Patients Europe, Brussels, Belgium
- 7European Sickle Cell Federation, Dublin, Ireland
- 8Childhood Cancer International Europe, Vienna, Austria
- 9Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Inequalities in access to clinical trials in cancer, haematology and rare diseases, along with the inconsistent incorporation and reporting of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are a long-addressed issue by patient communities. The European Atlas on Clinical Trials in Cancer and Haematology (EuroACT) is a patient-led investigation assessing regional inequalities in access to clinical trials, the frequency and type of patient reported outcome (PRO) data collection in trials, and the reporting of PRO findings in selected solid tumours, malignant/non-malignant haematological conditions and rare diseases across Europe.This protocol outlines the development of three comprehensive datasets [i.e., clinical trials, patient reported outcome and experience measure (PROM, PREM), and publication datasets] along research questions and analysis plan for the EuroACT study. Data for the analysis were sourced from public clinical trial registries (e.g., EudraCT, ClinicalTrials.gov), PRO databases, and published literature, and were subsequently processed in several steps, including standardisation, enrichment, and merging. The analysis plan is organised into three workstreams, each focusing on hypotheses related to the geographical distribution of clinical trials, the use of PROMs in trials, and the frequency of PRO data publication, addressing multiple primary and sub-research questions. The EuroACT study has been co-developed with the patient community, involving a steering group of patient representatives at each step.Results: A dataset of interventional trials and observational studies with European sites resulted containing 11,185 trials and 1.8 million data points for interventional trials, and 3,723 trials and 2,200 data points for observational studies. The PROM/PREM dataset contains information on 631 PROMs and 14 PREMs. The publication dataset development resulted in a comprehensive dataset containing information on 14,484 scientific publications.The EuroACT research project integrates high-quality data sources, including EudraCT and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT), with advanced data processing techniques. The data access and processing workflows were developed to enhance transparency, reproducibility, and reliability, while also laying the groundwork for future automation efforts.
Keywords: Cancer, haematology, rare disease, Patient, Patient reported outcome, clinical trials
Received: 10 Jan 2025; Accepted: 25 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Cases, Giles, Agh, Piggin, Geissler, Racovita, Hagymásy, Ruth, Józwiak, Hyseni-Bocolli, Plate and Hosszú. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Mercè Cases, merce.cases@patientadvocacy.eu
Rachel Giles, rachelhelengiles@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.