ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Predictive Toxicology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1567316
This article is part of the Research TopicEvaluating Toxicological Risks of Traditional Medicines in Modern HealthcareView all 9 articles
Comprehensive safety assessment of Qiwei Tiexie Pill: integrating histopathological, biochemical, and metabolomic analyses in a rat model
Provisionally accepted- 1Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
- 2China Tibetology Research Center, Beijing, China
- 3South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
- 4Technological Innovation Center of Traditional Tibetan Medicine Modernization of XiZang Autonomous Region, Lhasa, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of the acute toxicological mechanisms of Qiwei Tiexie Pill (QWTX) and its key mineral component, processed iron powder, using an integrative approach combining histopathological examination, serum biochemistry, and multi-platform metabolomics (¹H NMR and LC-MS) in Sprague-Dawley rats following 7-day oral administration. While both treatments preserved hepatic structural integrity and did not induce hepatotoxicity, significant renal effects were observed in a dose- and formulation-dependent manner. High-dose processed iron powder caused moderate renal histopathological alterations—primarily vascular changes and hemorrhage—alongside metabolic disruptions in both liver and kidney. In contrast, QWTX, despite inducing significant metabolic perturbations at high dose, maintained normal renal architecture, indicating a protective effect conferred by its herbal components. Metabolomic and biochemical analyses revealed that both agents induce systemic metabolic reprogramming across four interdependent physiological domains: (1) energy metabolism, characterized by TCA cycle impairment and enhanced branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) catabolism; (2) oxidative stress, with evidence of glutathione depletion, pentose phosphate pathway suppression, and lipid peroxidation; (3) nitrogen metabolism, showing a "hepato-renal disconnect" between upregulated hepatic urea synthesis and impaired renal urea handling, leading to functional nitrogen retention; and (4) neuroendocrine regulation, with widespread dysregulation of catecholamine, serotonin, melatonin, steroid, and sex hormone pathways. These interconnected disturbances suggest that toxicity arises not from isolated organ damage but from network-level metabolic failure. Notably, QWTX demonstrated a superior safety profile compared to processed iron powder alone, particularly in preserving renal structure and mitigating iron-associated nephrotoxicity. However, high-dose QWTX still triggered significant oxidative and metabolic stress, underscoring the importance of dose optimization in clinical use. These findings provide a systems-level understanding of the acute toxicological profile of QWTX and processed iron powder, supporting the traditional principles of herbal-metal synergy in Tibetan medicine while highlighting the need for long-term safety studies to evaluate cumulative mineral exposure and chronic metabolic effects.
Keywords: Qiwei Tiexie Pill, Processed iron powder, Metabolomics, Hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity
Received: 27 Jan 2025; Accepted: 20 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zheng, Liu, Wang, Kan, Wang, Cui, Lin, Zhou, Feng and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xin Feng, China Tibetology Research Center, Beijing, 100029, China
Junsong Wang, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.