PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. ELSI in Science and Genetics
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1570899
This article is part of the Research TopicThe Erosion of Trust in the 21st Century: Origins, Implications, and SolutionsView all 10 articles
Building Trust in Clinical Research: A Systems Approach to Ethical Engagement and Sustainable Outcomes
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
- 2Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Lombardy, Italy
- 3Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
- 4Consorzio Interuniversitario per le Biotecnologie, Trieste, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy
- 5Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States
- 6Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, Modena, Lombardy, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Trust and trustworthiness are critical to the success of clinical research, profoundly influencing participant engagement, data integrity, and study outcomes. These behaviors emerge from complex, dynamic interactions within the clinical research ecosystem, involving stakeholders such as sponsors, participants, clinicians, researchers, and regulatory bodies. The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines has underscored the potential of scientific advancements to build public trust in the scientific outcomes, while also exposing vulnerabilities in the procedural trust framework due to misinformation and historical unethical practices. This paper explores trust and trustworthiness as emergent properties within the complex systems of clinical research, highlighting their evolution through transparent communication, participant empowerment, and ethical governance. A systems approach is emphasized, where trust develops holistically, influenced by regulatory frameworks, interpersonal relationships, and the overall research environment. Practical implications include the adoption of adaptive consent models, interdisciplinary collaboration, and the integration of continuous feedback mechanisms. To address trust erosion, especially among marginalized communities, we advocate for participatory research approaches and the development of new professional competencies, such as the role of a Clinical Research Liaison. This role would ensure ongoing alignment with community needs, enhance transparency, and maintain ethical standards, ultimately fostering a research environment where trust and trustworthiness thrive, benefiting both participants and the broader scientific community. A roadmap for future efforts includes the systematic incorporation of these elements into clinical research practices to enhance trust and improve research outcomes.
Keywords: clinical research, engagement, empowerment, respect, Transparency, autonomy, Social alliance, emergence
Received: 04 Feb 2025; Accepted: 09 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Blom, Rivi, TASCEDDA and Pani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Johanna MC Blom, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, 41121, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.