ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1577232
This article is part of the Research TopicMulti-omics Application in Exploring Potential Biomarkers Targeting Resistance of Anti-Cancer Drugs, Volume IIView all 6 articles
Immune-related gene risk model establishment and role of key gene FUCA1 in malignant pleural mesothelioma
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Tumor Cell Biology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
- 2Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
- 3Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare type of tumor closely associated with asbestos exposure. Increasing evidence shows that high immuno-heterogeneity reduces the therapeutic efficacy of MPM. At present, good biomarkers to screen immunodominant populations and predict the efficacy of immunotherapy are lacking. In this study, expression data from TCGA, GSE2459, GSE51024, and GSE29354 were integrated for model construction. An eight-gene risk score model (FLI1, IL32, FUCA1, CCR2, PSMB10, CCL5, WT1, and KRT5) was constructed using CIBERSORT, weighted gene co-expression network analysis, Cox regression analysis, differentially expressed gene analysis, and protein-protein interaction network. The K-M survival analysis was used to evaluate the prediction ability of the risk score model. The TIDE database and Oncology Drug Sensitivity Genomics database were used to assess the predictive power of risk score models for treatment. In addition, the expression of the key gene in para-carcinoma tissue and MPM samples were detected by Immunohistochemistry. Patient clinical information was employed to evaluate the relationship between key genes and patient survival. Finally, the biological functions of the key gene were examined by in vitro and in vivo experiments. The score model was used to divide patients with MPM into low-and high-risk groups. The high-risk group was characterized by a survival disadvantage, and they were less sensitive to immunotherapy. Clinical data suggest that FUCA1, which is a key gene in the model, is an independent risk factor for predicting the prognosis of patients with MPM. A series of experiments demonstrated that FUCA1 expression was negatively correlated with the proliferation, invasion and migration abilities of MPM cells. Further studies revealed that FUCA1 inhibited epithelial-mesenchymal transition in MPM cells by regulating the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. The risk score model provides a new perspective for screening potential populations to benefit from immunotherapy and predicting their survival. FUCA1 may be a potential prognostic biomarker and promising therapeutic target for patients with MPM.
Keywords: malignant pleural mesothelioma1, immune cell2, Machine Learning3, FUCA14, EMT5
Received: 15 Feb 2025; Accepted: 07 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Shi, Dongqi, Zhu, He, Zuo, Chen, Luo, Wang, Huang, Chen and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Dingzhi Huang, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
Peng Chen, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
Hua Guo, Department of Tumor Cell Biology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.