Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1583654

Efficacy and Safety of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in the Treatment of Advanced Urological Cancers : a systematic review and a meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Tian  LiuTian Liu1Xiao  XieXiao Xie1Yangz-Zi  RenYangz-Zi Ren2Zongyu  LiZongyu Li3Maoping  CaiMaoping Cai4*Yu  YuzhongYu Yuzhong5*Lin  ZhuoLin Zhuo1*
  • 1Pingxiang Affiliated Hospital, Pingxiang, China
  • 2The First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
  • 3Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
  • 4Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
  • 5Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) offer novel therapeutic options for advanced urological cancers, but their efficacy and safety vary across cancer types. Many non-urothelial cancer ADC trials are small, nonrandomized studies with limited validated evaluation indicators. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ADCs across various urological cancers.Methods: Relevant studies were identified through searches in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP database and WanFang dataset, including randomized controlled trials, single-arm studies, and retrospective analyses on ADCs for advanced urological cancers. RoB 2.0, MINORS, and NOS were used for quality assessment, with R 4.4.0 for data analysis.Results: This meta-analysis included 46 studies with 3,250 patients, covering urothelial cancer (29 studies), renal cell carcinoma (5 studies), testicular cancer (2 studies), and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (10 studies). Three ADCs for urothelial cancer have received approval, including enfortumab vedotin (EV), sacituzumab govitecan (SG), and the HER2-ADC vedicilizumab (RC-48)/ disitamab vedotin(DV). For urothelial cancer, the pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 43% (95% CI: 39%-47%) and disease control rate (DCR) was 76% (95% CI: 71%-80%). Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 11.55 months (95% CI: 10.63-12.47) and 5.52 months (95% CI: 5.32-5.72) for enfortumab vedotin (EV), and 15.30 months (95% CI: 11.21-19.40) and 5.80 months (95% CI: 4.88-6.72) for DV. DV combined with immunotherapy achieved a pooled median PFS of 9.78 months (95% CI: 7.73-11.83). For renal cell carcinoma, the ORR was 6% (95% CI: 2%-10%) with median OS of 12.71 months (95% CI: 9.67-15.75).For metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, ADC efficacy was higher in chemotherapy-experienced patients (ORR: 17% vs 5%).ADCs demonstrate efficacy and safety in treating urological cancers, but further clinical trials are needed, particularly for renal, testicular, and prostate cancers, to support personalized treatment strategies.

Keywords: Antibody-drug conjugates, Urological cancers, efficacy, Safety, Meta-analysis

Received: 26 Feb 2025; Accepted: 18 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Xie, Ren, Li, Cai, Yuzhong and Zhuo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Maoping Cai, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, Shanghai Municipality, China
Yu Yuzhong, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
Lin Zhuo, Pingxiang Affiliated Hospital, Pingxiang, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.