Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Pharmacology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1594504

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in the Potential Treatments of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases: Addressing the Public Health Burden, Volume IIView all 4 articles

Gastrentrological Clinical Trials in Italy: An Association study on regional Economic Factors and Healthcare System Efficiency

Provisionally accepted
  • National Institute of Gastroenterology S. de Bellis Research Hospital (IRCCS), Bari, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This study investigates the geographical distribution of gastrointestinal oncology clinical trials (CTs) in Italy and their association with regional economic factors and healthcare system efficiency. Despite the Italian National Health Service (NHS) providing universal healthcare, significant disparities exist, particularly between wealthier northern/central regions and less affluent southern regions. The study examines how socio-economic parameters, NHS funding, and specialized research institutions (Institutes of Hospitalisation and Care of a Scientific Character, IRCCS) influence CT accessibility and distribution. A retrospective analysis of 103 active interventional CTs (March 2020-March 2024) registered on ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted. Socio-economic and healthcare data, including population density, NHS expenditure, regional income, and unemployment rates, were sourced from national databases. Spearman's association and Poisson regression analyses evaluated associations between CT numbers and regional variables for Italy's 20 regions. CT distribution was highly clustered, with 44% conducted at IRCCS facilities, predominantly in northern/central regions. Strong associations were observed between CT numbers and NHS expenditure (ρ=0.913, p<=0.001) and population density (ρ=0.777, p<0.001). Southern regions and islands hosted fewer trials, reflecting lower healthcare funding and IRCCS availability. Also, total number of IRCCS facilities (both public and private) shows a strong positive correlation with the number of CTs (ρ = 0.837, p < 0.001). Regression models identified population size, density, and health expenditure as significant predictors of CT numbers, while unemployment showed an inverse relationship. No association was found with public pharmaceutical expenditure. Regional disparities in CT accessibility are driven by economic inequality and uneven healthcare infrastructure. Targeted policies to increase funding, expand IRCCS networks in southern Italy, and promote equitable resource allocation are urgently needed. CT distribution may serve as a novel indicator of healthcare system performance. Addressing these imbalances is vital to ensuring equitable patient access to innovative therapies and optimizing the NHS's research capacity nationwide.

Keywords: clinical trials, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Italian NHS, Regional disparities, Economic factors, Healthcare efficiency, IRCCS

Received: 16 Mar 2025; Accepted: 24 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Polignano, Guido, National Institute Of Gastroenterology S. De Bellis Research Hospital and Giannelli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Maurizio Gaetano Polignano, National Institute of Gastroenterology S. de Bellis Research Hospital (IRCCS), Bari, Italy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.