ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Experimental Pharmacology and Drug Discovery
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1602191
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Biomarkers and Drug Targets: Harnessing Traditional and AI Approaches for Novel Therapeutic MechanismsView all 10 articles
Identifying Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia risk based on Clinical Indicators: A machine learning predictive model based on the SHAP methodology
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Digestive Endoscopy, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- 2Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Screening for gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) holds significant importance for the early detection of gastric cancer. To help clinicians identify high-risk GIM patients and determine the timing of gastric mucosal biopsy, we aim to develop a predictive model for the occurrence of GIM in patients.Patients were collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, following rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. Initially, the VarSelRF algorithm identified independent variables linked to GIM development. We employed eight machine learning algorithms, including Decision Trees (DT), Elastic Net (ENet), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), LightGBM, Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) to construct predictive models. Their performances were benchmarked using ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves.We also applied SHAP values to interpret the RF model, quantifying the contribution of each feature to predictions. Additionally, a web-based calculator was developed based on the RF model to facilitate practical clinical applications.Among the 975 patients examined, 322 individuals were pathologically confirmed to have GIM.Eleven independent variables significantly contributed to GIM occurrence, including gastric mucosal atrophy, H. pylori infection, direct bilirubin (DBIL), creatinine (Crea), smoking and alcohol history, gender, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), age, albumin/globulin ratio (ALB/GLO), and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT). The RF model demonstrated strong performance among the eight machine learning algorithms tested, achieving an AUC of 0.8167 in the testing dataset, along with a specificity of 85.5% and a sensitivity of 57.0%. The model's interpretive capabilities were enhanced by SHAP values, which helped clinicians understand the decision-making process.The resulting web-based calculator serves as a practical tool for clinicians.This study highlights the innovative use of serological biomarkers to assess the risk of GIM. We found that certain markers related to liver and kidney function are strong predictors of GIM 3 development. Additionally, the application of SHAP values improves the understanding of how features contribute to predictions, while the newly developed web-based calculator offers a practical tool for clinicians to evaluate GIM risk more easily.
Keywords: Gastric intestinal metaplasia, machine learning, Clinical indicators, serological test, screening
Received: 29 Mar 2025; Accepted: 07 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Bi, Song, Sun and Gong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Aixia Gong, doctorgax@sina.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.