ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Ethnopharmacology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1607947
This article is part of the Research TopicPlant Metabolites in Drug Discovery: The Prism Perspective between Plant Phylogeny, Chemical Composition, and Medicinal Efficacy, Volume IVView all 6 articles
Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of confusing Tetrastigma species based on DNA barcoding and chloroplast genome
Provisionally accepted- 1Dali University, Dali, China
- 2Yunnan Branch of Institute of Medicinal Plant Development Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Jinghong, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Tetrastigma plants are widely utilized in traditional medicine (such as Tetrastigma. obtectum and Tetrastigma. serrulatum, two important commonly medicinal plants), primarily for their properties in promoting blood circulation, , strengthening bones and tendons, and so on. However, the high diversity of species differentiation poses a challenge in accurately identifying the various Tetrastigma species without specialized taxonomic knowledge. Materials and Methods: To screen the candidate barcode sequences of Tetrastigma species, we first report the complete chloroplasts genomes of T. obtectum and T. serrulatum obtained via high throughput Illumina sequencing and compare them with fourteen previously sequenced species. Furthermore, we collected fresh leaf samples from T. obtectum and T. serrulatum (totally 38 samples) and evaluated the discriminatory efficacy of the nuclear DNA Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 fragment through comparative analysis of sequence variations and secondary structures. Finally, to analyze the phylogenetic position of Tetrastigma species, we constructed a Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree using CP genome sequences of 46 species from seven genera within the Vitaceae family.Results and discussion: The CP genomes of Tetrastigma exhibited a typical circular tetramerous structure, including a large single-copy region (87,381-88,979 bp), a small single-copy region (18,649-19,339 bp), and a pair of inverted repeats (26,288-26,934 bp). The guanine-cytosine content of the CP genomes is 37.35 - 37.62%. The codon usage shows a significant preference for end with A/T. Then, the results of nucleotide diversity analysis showed that ten polymorphic hotspots (psbM-trnD-GUC, ndhF-rpl32, trnS-GCU-trnG-UCC, ycf1, rpl32-trnL-UAG, trnS-UGA-psbZ, psbE-petL, matK-rps16, rpl16, and rpl22) could be the candidate DNA marker suitable for Tetrastigma species. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that the ITS2 sequence could effectively discriminate T. obtectum and T. serrulatum , whereas the secondary structure cannot, proving that ITS2 can be used as an efficient barcode fragment to accurately identify the two species. The aim of this study was not only to determine the identification efficiency of the CP genome and ITS2 for T. obtectum and T. serrulatum but also to clarify the phylogenetic relationship and screen the candidate DNA marker suitable for Tetrastigma species, provide valuable data support for further accurate identification of the Tetrastigma genus.
Keywords: Tetrastigma, Tetrastigma Obtectum, Tetrastigma Serrulatum, Chloroplast genome, Species identification, phylogenetic relationship
Received: 08 Apr 2025; Accepted: 11 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Zhang, Song, Xu, Qu, Li, Wang, Duan and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Baozhong Duan, Dali University, Dali, China
ZhongLian Zhang, Yunnan Branch of Institute of Medicinal Plant Development Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Jinghong, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.