ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Pharmacoepidemiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1608051
Trends of prescription opioid use in Europe: A DARWIN EU® multinational cohort study including 7 European countries
Provisionally accepted- 1Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
- 2Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- 3IQVIA (United Kingdom), London, United Kingdom
- 4.Institut Universitari d’Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAPJGol),, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- 5Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, Aquitaine, France
- 6Institute of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Tartu County, Estonia
- 7University Institute for Primary Care Research (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- 8IQVIA (Netherlands), Amsterdam, Netherlands
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background The opioid crisis has been a serious public health challenge in North America for decades, despite numerous efforts to mitigate its devastating consequences. As concerns about a potential similar situation evolving in Europe are rising, we evaluated the trends of opioid use and characterise indications in seven European countries. Methods We conducted a multinational cohort study using electronic health records from primary care (CRPD GOLD [UK], SIDIAP [Spain], IPCI [the Netherlands]), primary– and outpatient specialist care (IQVIA DA Germany, IQVIA LPD Belgium), hospital care (CHUBX [France]) and the Estonian Biobank (EBB), all mapped to the OMOP Common Data Model. All people registered in a contributing database for ≥365 days between 2012 and 2022 were included. Annual period prevalence and incidence rates of opioid prescriptions were estimated, and long-term trends were quantified through percent change between 2012 and 2019. New opioid users were characterised, including potential indications. Results The incidence of opioid prescriptions decreased in primary care between 2012 and 2019 by -50·7% (CPRD GOLD) and -2·0% (SIDIAP), while it increased in EBB (+52·8%) and CHUBX (+25·3%) data. Incidence of codeine and tramadol use decreased in most databases. However, prevalence of oxycodone, morphine, and fentanyl increased. Opioid use was highest in older age groups, and the majority of prescriptions were oral opioids. Respiratory conditions and pain-related conditions were the most common indications for new opioid users in outpatient settings. Conclusions Despite a decrease in new opioid prescriptions in many European countries, the prevalence of opioid use remained largely stable over the last decade. More data is needed to monitor the evolving opioid prescription patterns in the post-pandemic era in Europe.
Keywords: opioid, Codine, Tramadol, Real world data (RWD), Regualtion
Received: 08 Apr 2025; Accepted: 15 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xie, Du, Guo, Barboza, Brash, Delmestri, Duarte-Salles, Gratton, Griffier, Kolde, Man, Mercadé-Besora, Oja, Seager, Verhamme, Vojinovic, Burn, Prieto-Alhambra, Català and Jödicke. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Daniel Prieto-Alhambra, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.