SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Ethnopharmacology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1614767
This article is part of the Research TopicHerbal Medicine for the Treatment of Chronic Metabolic Diseases, Volume IIView all 26 articles
Comparative efficacy of eight traditional Chinese medicines combined with statins in the treatment of hyperlipidemia: A Bayesian network meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
- 2Xiangdong Hospital Affiliated to Hunan Normal University, Liling, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Hyperlipidemia drives global cardiovascular mortality by elevating risks of atherosclerosis and stroke. While statins are foundational, traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) are widely combined with statins to boost efficacy. However, diverse TCM formulations lack comparative evidence in combination regimens, necessitating urgent evidence-based optimization. Methods: Based on preliminary literature review and component usage frequency analysis, 8 TCMs were included firstly. Then, we conducted a systematic search for RCTs that assessed 8 TCMs with traditional statin drugs (TT) for the treatment of hyperlipidemia. The search was conducted through September 30, 2024, and encompassed China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Database of Chinese Sci-Tech Periodicals (VIP), Wanfang Database, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Outcomes included clinical total effective rate, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Risk of bias in RCTs was evaluated using Cochrane's bias risk tool. Evidence synthesis was performed utilizing both direct and Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMA). Meta-regression analysis, subgroup analysis, publication bias analysis, and sensitivity analysis were employed to evaluate heterogeneity sources and efficacy robustness. Ranking analysis was implemented to comparatively assess clinical efficacy among eight TCMs. Evidence quality for each outcome was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach (GRADE). Overall, the proposed structured framework integrated high-frequency TCM screening, NMA-driven efficacy ranking, methodological validation, and mechanistic investigation to holistically evaluate therapeutic interventions for the first time. Results: 67 RCTs involving 7327 individuals and 8 TCMs were encompassed. Related analyses indicated TT+TCMs were more efficacious than TT monotherapy. Among 8 TCMs+TT, TT combined with Jiangzhi Tongmai Capsule (TT+JZTM) demonstrated the highest clinical total effective rate, TT combined with Dantian Jiangzhi Pill (TT+DTJZ) was the most effective in reducing TC, TT combined with Pushen Capsule (TT+PS) was the most effective in reducing TG, and TT combined with Jiangzhiling Tablet (TT+JZL) was the most effective in increasing HDL-C and reducing LDL-C. Conclusion: NMA revealed the overall clinical efficacy of TT+JZL, TT+DTJZ, and TT+JZTM were ranked at the forefront in treating hyperlipidemia. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for tailoring TCM-statin combinations to target individualized lipid profiles.
Keywords: traditional Chinese medicines, Hyperlipidemia, Network meta-analysis, clinical efficacy, Safety outcome
Received: 19 Apr 2025; Accepted: 18 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Jiang, Fan, Zhou, Liu, Pan, Yang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Qinhe Yang, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Yupei Zhang, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.