Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1615284

This article is part of the Research TopicState of the Art in Antithrombotic TherapyView all 8 articles

Efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants in the treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease with Atrial Fibrillation or Venous Thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Qinan  YinQinan Yin1Xingyue  ZhengXingyue Zheng2Xiaoqing  NiXiaoqing Ni1Yin  WangYin Wang1Xuefei  HuangXuefei Huang1Yujie  SongYujie Song1Lizhu  HanLizhu Han1Youjin  HuangYoujin Huang1Bian  YuanBian Yuan1*
  • 1Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
  • 2Chengdu Women and Children’s Central Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background:The choice of oral anticoagulants for patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) combined with venous thromboembolism (VTE) or atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial.Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the treatment of CKD with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism.Methods: Relevant publications were sourced from databases like PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to June 30, 2024. Only RCTs assessing the efficacy and safety of warfarin and DOACs for treating CKD with AF or VTE were included in the meta-analysis. The review outcomes are thrombosis recurrence or VTE-related deaths and major bleeding for CKD patients with VTE, and stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding for CKD patients with AF. The risk of bias in all included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool.After reviewing 540 studies, 15 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with 16361 participants were included. The study found that DOACs reduced the risk of hemorrhagic stroke compared to warfarin in patients with AF and CKD (RR = 0.455, 95% CI: 0.275-0.752, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in ischemic stroke incidence between the two. DOACs also lowered the risk of major bleeding in patients with AF and CKD compared to warfarin (RR = 0.604, 95% CI: 0.442-0.825, P = 0.002), and significantly reduced the risk of intracranial bleeding (RR = 0.424, 95% CI: 0.287-0.626, P < 0.001). All 5 studies reported recurrent VTE or VTE-related deaths, showing no significant difference between warfarin and DOAC groups (RR= 0.663, 95% CI: 0.409-1.073, P= 0.094), Patients with renal dysfunction on either treatment had similar risks of major bleeding events (RR = 0.543, 95% CI: 0.209-1.407, P = 0.208).DOACs demonstrate superior efficacy and safety compared to warfarin in patients with AF and CKD. Additionally, DOACs exhibit comparable efficacy and safety to warfarin in patients with VTE and CKD.

Keywords: Venous Thromboembolism, Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Kidney Disease, oral anticoagulation, Systematic review

Received: 21 Apr 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yin, Zheng, Ni, Wang, Huang, Song, Han, Huang and Yuan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Bian Yuan, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, 611731, Sichuan Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.