Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1617534

This article is part of the Research TopicIncreasing Importance of Patients-generated Real World Data for Healthcare Policy Decisions about Medicinal Products: Volume IIIView all 5 articles

Comparative Cardiovascular Outcomes of Aripiprazole vs. Risperidone in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Schizophrenia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taichung County, Taiwan
  • 2Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Individuals with schizophrenia have substantially elevated cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, a disparity further exacerbated by coexisting type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The impact of specific antipsychotics on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients with T2DM remains unclear. We aimed to compare major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with co-occurring T2DM and schizophrenia treated with aripiprazole versus risperidone.Methods: We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study within the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (2014–2024). Adults (≥18 years) with diagnoses of T2DM and schizophrenia who were new users of aripiprazole or risperidone were identified. Aripiprazole and risperidone cohorts were propensity score–matched 1:1 (n=5,691 each) on demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index), healthcare utilization, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors, comorbidities, and baseline medications. The primary outcome was time to first MACE, defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death, or all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare outcomes over up to 10 years of follow-up. Subgroup analyses by sex, age, and race and a time-stratified analysis (≤1 year vs. >1 year follow-up) were performed.Results: After matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced (mean age 51.1 years, 45% female, median HbA1c ~7.3% in both groups). Aripiprazole was associated with a significantly elevated hazard of MACE compared to risperidone (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.18). This risk difference emerged primarily beyond the first year of treatment. The excess risk with aripiprazole was driven largely by higher rates of heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias, whereas risks of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke were similar between groups. No significant heterogeneity in the treatment effect was observed across sex, age, or racial subgroups.Conclusion: In this large real-world cohort of patients with T2DM and schizophrenia, aripiprazole use was associated with a modest but significant increase in the risk of MACEs compared to risperidone. Clinicians should remain vigilant about cardiovascular risk management in this population regardless of antipsychotic choice. Further research is needed to elucidate mechanisms and to confirm these observations in prospective studies.

Keywords: 347, Word counts: 5051 Table:5, Figure:2, Supplemental table:1 References: 15 Aripiprazole, Risperidone, MACE, Schizophrenia, diabetes

Received: 24 Apr 2025; Accepted: 09 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yeh, Lo, Huang, Yang, 廖 and Kornelius. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Edy Kornelius, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, 40201, Taichung County, Taiwan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.