Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1620394

Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Qiang  ZhouQiang Zhou1Xiang  LiuXiang Liu2Shuyu  LiuShuyu Liu1Zhi-Chun  GuZhi-Chun Gu3Yanzi  WuYanzi Wu1Yuansu  YangYuansu Yang1Yingying  TaoYingying Tao1Meng  WeiMeng Wei1*
  • 1Affiliated Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
  • 2Jiangsu College of Nursing, Huai'an, China
  • 3Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and liver disease, particularly cirrhosis, are frequently excluded from anticoagulation trials, leaving the optimal therapeutic strategy uncertain.This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with AF and liver disease. We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase databases for relevant studies published up to November 2024.Results: Fourteen studies, involving 44,848 participants, were included. Compared to VKAs, DOACs were associated with significantly lower risks of major bleeding (relative risk [RR]: 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.75; P < 0.0001), intracranial bleeding (RR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.56; P < 0.0001), gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (RR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59-0.89; P = 0.002), and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.98; P =0.03). No significant difference was observed in ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.52-1.13; P = 0.19). In patients with cirrhosis, DOACs were similarly superior for major bleeding, GI bleeding, and intracranial bleeding. Subgroup analyses revealed that apixaban demonstrated a more favorable safety profile than rivaroxaban in patients with liver disease, whereas both agents showed comparable effectiveness and safety in cirrhotic patients.DOACs are safer and equally effective alternatives to VKAs in patients with AF and liver disease, including those with cirrhosis. In patients with liver disease, apixaban may offer additional safety benefits compared with rivaroxaban. However, in patients with cirrhosis, the effectiveness and safety profiles of the two drugs are similar.

Keywords: Atrial Fibrillation, Liver disease, direct oral anticoagulants, Vitamin K antagonists, Anticoagulants, Meta-analysis

Received: 29 Apr 2025; Accepted: 27 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhou, Liu, Liu, Gu, Wu, Yang, Tao and Wei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Meng Wei, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.