ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Translational Pharmacology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1621775

Assessment of Drug Permeability Using a Small Airway Microphysiological System

Provisionally accepted
Robert  GeigerRobert Geiger*Shekh  M RahmanShekh M RahmanShadiqur  RashidShadiqur RashidCatherine  SullenbergerCatherine SullenbergerSabyasachy  MistrySabyasachy MistryKatherine  SheaKatherine SheaIsra  TariqIsra TariqOmnia  IsmaielOmnia IsmaielMurali  K MattaMurali K MattaPaula  HylandPaula HylandSasha  BerdichevskiSasha BerdichevskiAlexandre  RibeiroAlexandre RibeiroKsenia  BlinovaKsenia BlinovaWenlei  JiangWenlei JiangRoss  WalengaRoss WalengaBryan  NewmanBryan NewmanDonna  VolpeDonna VolpeKevin  FordKevin Ford*
  • United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: There is a need to reliably predict the permeability of inhaled compounds during the development of new and generic drugs. A small airway microphysiological system (MPS) that can recapitulate the pulmonary air-liquid interface (ALI) with primary epithelial and vascular endothelial cell layers may provide a more physiologically relevant environment for measuring drug permeability than simpler two-dimensional in vitro cell culture platforms. Therefore, we evaluated the use of a small airway MPS to measure the permeability of inhaled drugs. Methodology: Primary human lung epithelial cells were seeded onto the top channel of the chip and cultured for 14 days at ALI to promoter monolayer differentiation, followed by addition of endothelial cells into the bottom channel. Due to the non-specific binding properties of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), a drug absorption study was conducted to quantify non-specific binding to the material. Drug permeability was evaluated by passing each compound (10 µM) through the top channel and measuring the amount of drug that permeated into the bottom channel over the time course of 30, 60, 120, and 180 min. Results: Confocal micrographs demonstrated the presence of tight junctions along with basal, goblet, and ciliated cells in the top channel and attachment of endothelial cells in the bottom channel. Insignificant nonspecific binding to the MPS was observed with albuterol sulfate, formoterol fumarate, and olodaterol hydrochloride (HCl), while fluticasone furoate showed significant nonspecific binding as only 6 -44% of the drug was recovered at 30 and 120 min, respectively. As a result, fluticasone furoate was excluded from further analysis. Permeability studies estimated an apparent permeability (P app ) of 1.02 × 10 -6 cm/s for albuterol sulfate, 0.0813 × 10 -6 cm/s for olodaterol HCl, and 2.44 × 10 -6 cm/s for formoterol fumarate. Discussion: Taken together, the small airway MPS recapitulated relevant cell types and many morphological features in the lung. The apparent permeabilities measured indicated that albuterol sulfate and formoterol fumarate would be categorized as highly permeable, while olodaterol HCl would be categorized as a low permeable drug.

Keywords: microphysiological system, Permeability, Regulatory Science, Small airway, Inhaled drugs

Received: 01 May 2025; Accepted: 11 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Geiger, Rahman, Rashid, Sullenberger, Mistry, Shea, Tariq, Ismaiel, Matta, Hyland, Berdichevski, Ribeiro, Blinova, Jiang, Walenga, Newman, Volpe and Ford. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Robert Geiger, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, United States
Kevin Ford, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.