Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Plant Active Substance on Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients

Lu Wang¹Xiao Fan XU²Mengmeng Guo³Dong Yanxu²Helin Ding²Alex Albert²shuai hao²Yuqing Song²Jun Gu²Zhenghong Yu^1*

• ¹Jinling Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing, China, Nanjing, China
• ²Department of General Surgery, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Nanjing, China
• ³Department of Breast Surgery, Nantong Maternal and Child Health Care, Nantong, China, Nantong, China

Background: Plant-derived active substances are increasingly recognized as potential adjuvant therapies in breast cancer treatment, with emerging evidence suggesting their positive impact on both treatment outcomes and quality of life (QoL). This study aims to evaluate the effects of fifteen active substances—soy capsules, Helixor A, Viscum album [L.] extracts, Withania somnifera, Paullinia cupana, P. ovata husk, ginseng, curcumin, Jollab, ginger, fermented soybean extract, mistletoe extract, robuvit®, peppermint extract, and Chlorella extract—on QoL in patients with breast cancer (BC). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to January 2025. The primary outcomes of interest included QoL, fatigue, pain, physical functioning, nausea, and role and emotional functioning. Statistical analyses were carried out using StataMP 15.1 software. Treatment efficacy was assessed using Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) probabilities. Additionally, cluster analysis was conducted to examine the multidimensional effects of natural extracts across these seven clinical outcomes. Results: After screening, 18 eligible studies were included, encompassing 2062 patients and evaluating 15 substances. The analysis incorporated patient-reported outcomes from multiple trials: QoL (11 studies), fatigue (10 studies), pain (8 studies), physical functioning (8 studies), nausea (7 studies), role functioning (7 studies), and emotional functioning (7 studies). Based on SUCRA values, Withania somnifera was identified as the most effective treatment for enhancing QoL (99.4%)(SMD = 4.66, 95% CI: 3.47 to 5.85),physical functioning (100.0%)(SMD = 7.78, 95% CI: 6.61 to 8.96), role functioning (100.0%)(SMD = 8.10, 95% CI: 6.89 to 9.32), and emotional functioning (100.0%)(SMD = 5.71, 95% CI: 4.81 to 6.61)were more effective than the standard treatment. Moreover, Withania somnifera was found to be the most promising option for reducing fatigue (99.9%), pain (100.0%), and nausea (98.6%). This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article Conclusion: The network meta-analysis indicates that Withania somnifera was effective in enhancing quality of life and contributed to a reduction in therapeutic side effects in BC patients. Our findings support the therapeutic potential of plant bioactive substances in breast cancer care; however, further clinical validation of their efficacy is warranted.