Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

STUDY PROTOCOL article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Neuropharmacology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1622672

This article is part of the Research TopicNovel Pharmacological Interventions in Emotional and Neuropsychiatric DisordersView all 4 articles

Safety and efficacy of esketamine combined with propofol or ciprofol sedation for electroconvulsive therapy in patients with major depressive disorder: protocol for a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with factorial design

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • 2Qianjiang Central Hospital/Qianjiang Hospital Affiliated to Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Qianjiang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is one of the main strategies for major depressive disorder (MDD). Recently, esketamine has been highlighted in the treatment of depression due to the rapid antidepressant effects. The present study hypothesizes that: (1) adjunctive esketamine during ECT will produce greater improvement in depressive symptoms compared to placebo; (2) esketamine-ciprofol combination will demonstrate superior antidepressant efficacy and fewer adverse events relative to esketamine-propofol combination.Methods and Analysis: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures trial with factorial design, planned to be conducted in Renmin hospital of Wuhan university from May 1st, 2024 to May 31st, 2025. A total of 168 cases with MDD undergoing scheduled ECT will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1:1:1 to receive propofol or ciprofol sedation with or without esketamine (0.25 mg/kg) treatment. Primary outcome is the changes from baseline to day 28 in HAMD-24. Secondary outcomes include the rate of response (a 50% or greater reduction in HAMD-24 total scores) and remission (a score of 8 or less in the HAMD-24 total scores), as well as the rate of reduction in the HAMD-24 total scores from baseline, at the end of trial. Besides, the incidence of adverse events and the details of ECT will also be recorded. Standard intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses will be performed after handling missing data via multiple imputation method. The predefined subgroup analysis on primary outcomes will be conducted according to age and sex. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) will be utilized to analyse the outcomes. This study will address two critical questions in ECT practice: whether ECT with adjunctive esketamine achieves clinically superior outcomes to ECT alone and anesthetic choice (ciprofol versus propofol) modulates the antidepressant efficacy of esketamine. The findings from this randomized controlled trial will provide novel evidence to optimize sedation regimens during ECT in patients with MDD, specifically addressing the risk-benefit ratio of adjunctive esketamine administration. Ethics and dissemination: This trial has been approved by the local Institutional Review Board (No. WDRY2024-K018) and conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki. Results of this trial will be publicly disclosed in a peer-reviewed journals. Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2400083664.

Keywords: Esketamine, Propofol, Ciprofol, Major Depressive Disorder, ECT

Received: 04 May 2025; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Su, Chen, Xia, Peng, Weng and Meng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Qing-tao Meng, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.