ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1626054
Analysis of six CYP450 genetic variants regarding the response to Cannabidiol combined with anticonvulsant medication in Mexican patients with drug-resistant epilepsy
Provisionally accepted- 1Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Neurológicas, Hospital de Especialidades, “Dr. Bernardo Sepúlveda”, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, Mexico
- 2CENTER FOR RESEARCH AND ADVANCED STUDIES, MEXICO CITY, Mexico
- 3Servicio de Neurología Pediátrica, Hospital de Pediatría, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, Mexico
- 4NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, MEXICO CITY, Mexico
- 5NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH, CUERNAVACA, Mexico
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Cannabidiol (CBD) reduces the frequency of seizures in individuals with specific epileptic syndromes, but its effectiveness for other types of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is unclear. CYP450 enzymes primarily metabolize CBD. The aim of this study was to identify CYP450 genotypes regarding the response of CBD treatment concomitant with anti-seizure drugs in patients with DRE. Methods: This observational, retrospective, comparative study examined patients with DRE who incorporated CBD into their treatment. Genomic DNA was extracted from the patients’ blood. Patients were divided into two groups: CBD responders and CBD non-responders. Six genetic variants of CYP450 genes were analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Statistical significance was determined using Fisher’s exact, chi-squared, and Mann–Whitney U tests. The analysis of polymorphisms involved a statistical test for proportion differences of more than 10% between the comparison groups. Results: This study examined 47 patients with DRE, of which 68% showed a positive response to CBD treatment in combination with their current medications. Among the patients who did not respond to adjuvant treatment with CBD, the CYP3A4 *1/rs2242480 genotype was present in 50%. These patients exhibited focal seizures along with various lesions in imaging studies. In contrast, the CYP2B6 *1/*2 and *2/*2 genotypes were identified in 42% of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who did respond to CBD treatment. These patients had unknown causes of their epilepsy and showed expected results in imaging studies. Conclusion: Treatment with CBD reduced seizures in most patients (68%), which was independent of etiology and seizure type. The genotype CYP3A4 *1/rs2242480 may be associated with low response to CBD.
Keywords: Pharmacoresistant epilepsy, Cannabidiol treatment, CYPs, SNP, Antiseizure medication
Received: 12 May 2025; Accepted: 20 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Feria-Romero, Rocha, Reyes-Cuayahuitl, Martínez-Juárez, SAN-JUAN, ESCAMILLA-NUÑEZ and Orozco-Suárez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Sandra Orozco-Suárez, Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Neurológicas, Hospital de Especialidades, “Dr. Bernardo Sepúlveda”, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, Mexico
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.