REVIEW article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Cardiovascular and Smooth Muscle Pharmacology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1626681
Which is the optimal choice in lipid-lowering therapy for reducing major cardiovascular events? A network meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted- Zibo Central Hospital, Shandong, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Currently, there are various lipid-lowering therapies in clinical practice, and the emergence of PCSK9 inhibitors has undoubtedly added a valuable tool to lipid-lowering strategies. However, existing studies lack comparisons between different PCSK9 inhibitors and between the outcomes of using PCSK9 inhibitors alone versus in combination with statins. Therefore, this study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of different lipid-lowering regimens, aiming to determine the optimal lipid-lowering regimen.We searched PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Library of Clinical Trials for related articles published up to October 2024. A network meta-analysis was applied including studies comparing PCSK9 inhibitors with statins or ezetimibe that have MACE outcomes. The efficacy endpoint was MACE, and the safety endpoints were new-onset diabetes and neurocognitive impairment.We included a total of 29 studies, comprising 68,686 patients. Compared to oral lipid-lowering drugs, PCSK9 inhibitors combined with statins significantly reduced the incidence of MACE. While, PCSK9 inhibitors alone did not significantly reduce the risk of MACE.For patients requiring intensive lipid lowering, the combination of PCSK9 inhibitors with statins provides the greatest clinical benefit. While, for patients with moderate to low risk who need only single-drug therapy, statins are generally preferred over PCSK9 inhibitors considering various factors.
Keywords: PCSK9 inhibitor, statin, MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events), LDL-C, Inclisiran
Received: 11 May 2025; Accepted: 12 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Niu, Wang, Chen and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Bo Li, Zibo Central Hospital, Shandong, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.