Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1629465

EUROCOVER-CLL: Reimbursement and accessibility of new treatments in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Doctoral School of Medical and Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
  • 2Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • 3Romanian Association of International Medicine Manufacturers, Bucharest, Romania
  • 4Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty of the University of Montenegro, University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro
  • 5Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices (HALMED), Zagreb, Croatia
  • 6Faculty of Biotechnology and Drug Development, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
  • 7Pharmacy and Pharmacology Center, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • 8Medison Pharma, Petah-Tiqva, Israel
  • 9Department of Reimbursement, National Health Insurance Fund Management, Budapest, Hungary
  • 10Department of Organization and Economics of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy,, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 11Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
  • 12Hungarian Health Economics Association, Budapest, Hungary
  • 13Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia
  • 14Department of Pharmacology with Clinical Pharmacology, Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
  • 15Department of Organization and Economics of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 16EconHealth s.r.o., Prague, Czechia
  • 17Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nis, Nis, Serbia
  • 18Department of Organization and Management of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
  • 19Department of Nutrition and Drug Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Despite recent therapeutic advances in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), access to innovative treatments may still be uneven outside Western Europe. This study aimed to explore reimbursement policy and access to novel targeted CLL therapies across selected countries and to analyze factors associated with differences in treatment availability and reimbursement timelines.Methods: Reimbursement frameworks, timelines, and accessibility of six novel CLL therapies were assessed across 15 countries in Central and Eastern Europe, the Balkans, Armenia, and Israel. Data were collected via expert surveys in late 2024, based on publicly available national and regional sources. The survey covered reimbursement extent, timelines, policy restrictions, coverage pathways, and health technology assessment (HTA) evaluations. Comparative analyses examined regional differences in reimbursement and their potential drivers. Spearman's rank correlation was used to explore associations between the number of reimbursed therapies, reimbursement delays, and demographic, macroeconomic, and epidemiological variables.The number of reimbursed therapies ranged from zero (Ukraine, Armenia) to five (Czech Republic), with a regional mean of 2.7 (SD = 1.38) and overall mean time to reimbursement of 29.3 months (SD = 21.4). Ibrutinib, reimbursed in 13 countries, had the longest mean reimbursement delay (35.6 months), while venetoclax (11 countries, 26.5 months), acalabrutinib (9 countries, 16.4 months), and zanubrutinib (6 countries, 15.2 months) had shorter delays. Gross domestic product (GPD) per capita showed a moderate positive correlation with the number of reimbursed therapies (ρ = 0.673, p = 0.006). Borderline significant associations were noted for CLL incidence and mortality (p = 0.050). Reimbursement indications were often restricted, particularly for patients without deletion 17p or TP53 mutations who experienced late relapses. Data on HTA outcomes and the number of treated patients were limited in several countries, and common challenges included funding constraints, administrative barriers, and the lack of centralized rare disease policies.Conclusions: Significant disparities in access to targeted CLL therapies persist across the analyzed countries, with the number of reimbursed therapies positively correlated with GDP per capita.

Keywords: CLL1, targeted therapies2, reimbursement3, healthcare policy4, drug accessibility5

Received: 15 May 2025; Accepted: 31 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Monica, Mujkic, Bianchi-Manaila, Duborija-Kovacevic, Draganic, Garuolienė, Hammerman, Ispán, Ivanova, Männik, Meresz, Nazaryan, Oleshchuk, Savova, Skoupa, Stefanovic, Tesar and Kawalec. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Magdalena Monica, Doctoral School of Medical and Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.