REVIEW article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Predictive Toxicology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1630961
Assessing Biomarkers of Exposure to Carcinogens Associated with Combustible Cigarettes, Electronic Cigarettes, and Heated Tobacco Products: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Smoore Tech Research Institute, Shenzhen, China
- 2Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, The School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- 3Suzhou Industrial Park Monash Research Institute of Science and Technology, Monash University, Suzhou, China
- 4Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- 5Department of Life Science, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- 6Centre for Substance Use Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
There is growing global concern about the emissions of harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) associated with electronic cigarette (EC) and heated tobacco product (HTP) use. This systematic review evaluates biomarkers of exposure (BoEs) for carcinogens in individuals who switched from combustible cigarettes (CCs) to either ECs or HTPs. Methods: A literature search was performed across PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 2013 to March 2024. Data synthesis was conducted using a random-effects meta-analysis, calculating ratios of means (RoMs) to compare biomarker concentrations among individuals who completely switched to ECs or HTPs, those who abstained from smoking, and those who continued smoking CCs. Results: Our analysis included 18 RCTs, examining 14 BoEs for FDA-identified carcinogenic HPHCs. Compared to continual CC smokers, individuals who completely switched to ECs demonstrated significantly lower exposure to eight carcinogens (i.e., 2-AN, 4-ABP, HEMA, MHBMA, NNAL, NNN, S-PMA, o-Tol; RoMs range: 0.031-0.461). Those who fully transitioned to HTPs showed significantly lower exposure to 12 carcinogens (i.e., 1-AN, 2-AN, 3-HMPMA, 3-OH-B[a]P, 4-ABP, CEMA, HEMA, MHBMA, NNAL, NNN, S-PMA, o-Tol; RoMs range: 0.054-0.527). No statistically significant differences in carcinogenic exposures were observed when comparing smoking cessation, or full switching to ECs or HTPs for all evaluated BoEs to continuous CC smoking, except for 3-HMPMA, CEMA, and NNN. Conclusion: Individuals who completely switched from CCs to ECs or HTPs had significantly lower exposure to numerous carcinogenic HPHCs, with the degree of reduction for some toxicants potentially approaching those of smoking abstainers. However, these findings require careful interpretation, as the evidence is predominantly derived from short-term trials (5-7 days). Further research should explore the long-term health impacts of residual nicotine and tobacco-specific toxicant exposures among these switchers.
Keywords: Biomarkers1, exposure assessment2, carcinogens3, combustible cigarettes4, electronic cigarettes5, heated tobacco products6, meta-analysis7
Received: 19 May 2025; Accepted: 16 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Cao, Zhang, Yang, Li, Chen, Zheng, Zhang, Xu and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xiaona Liu, Smoore Tech Research Institute, Shenzhen, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.