Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1635449

This article is part of the Research TopicPhytochemical Interventions to CancerView all 4 articles

Synergistic Anticancer Effects of Camptothecin and Sotorasib in KRAS-Mutated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Provisionally accepted
  • 1School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India
  • 2Gachon University, Seongnamsi, Republic of Korea
  • 3Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India
  • 4King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Sotorasib (AMG510) is a first-in-class irreversible, covalent, and selective KRAS G12C inhibitor. However, in patients, acquired clinical resistance was observed within one year of its FDA approval. Researchers are exploring combination and repurposing strategies to help overcome this resistance and improve therapeutic efficacy. Several natural compounds have been extensively investigated for their therapeutic potential against various cancers, both individually and in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. In this study, we examined the synergistic potential of camptothecin and sotorasib in KRAS G12C-mutated MIA PaCa-2 and KRAS G12D-mutated PANC-1 PDAC cells. Methods: We assessed the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of camptothecin & sotorasib using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, and predicted their synergistic potential using combination index (CI) values & isobologram plots. Proliferation, wound healing, and colony formation assays were performed to examine the chemotherapeutic potential of camptothecin & sotorasib (combination and monotherapy). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) induction, DNA fragmentation, autophagy flux, and apoptosis and cell cycle analyses were performed using 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), LC3-II quantification assays, and flow cytometry analysis. Furthermore, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed to analyze gene expression patterns in both PDAC cell lines. Additionally, network pharmacology, gene ontology, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of and Genomes pathway enrichment were performed for camptothecin in PDAC. Results: The combination therapy with camptothecin & sotorasib resulted in significantly inhibited proliferation, migration, and colony formation; elevated intracellular ROS levels; and induced DNA fragmentation compared with monotherapies in both PDAC cell lines. Flow cytometry and cell cycle analysis revealed that the combination treatment induced apoptosis and G1/S cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, qRT-PCR analysis revealed that the combination therapy significantly upregulated pro-apoptotic genes and downregulated KRAS pathway-related genes, cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, anti-apoptotic-related genes as well as autophagy-related genes in both PDAC cell lines. Network pharmacology analysis supports that the identified hub genes play a role in apoptosis and autophagy. Conclusion: We observed a synergistic relationship between camptothecin and sotorasib in KRAS-mutated cancer cells. Furthermore, we recommend examining more natural compounds with chemotherapeutic potential to help overcome clinical resistance of approved chemotherapeutic drugs in the near future.

Keywords: alkaloid, Camptothecin, Sotorasib, KRAS mutation, PDAC, synergistic effect

Received: 26 May 2025; Accepted: 25 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ramalingam, Chellasamy, Hussain, Gothandam, Hussain, ALROKAYAN, Yun, Mekala and Arumugam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Janaki Ramaiah Mekala, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India
Sivakumar Arumugam, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.